Suppr超能文献

青光眼患者中 Humphrey FASTPAC 阈值程序的评估

Evaluation of the Humphrey FASTPAC threshold program in glaucoma.

作者信息

O'Brien C, Poinoosawmy D, Wu J, Hitchings R

机构信息

Glaucoma Unit, Moorfields Eye Hospital, London.

出版信息

Br J Ophthalmol. 1994 Jul;78(7):516-9. doi: 10.1136/bjo.78.7.516.

Abstract

The makers of the Humphrey perimeter have developed a rapid thresholding program, FASTPAC, to address the problems of fatigue and poor test performance associated with prolonged perimetry. The performance of FASTPAC was compared with the standard threshold program of the Humphrey visual field analyser (program 24-2) in 44 glaucoma patients. FASTPAC reduced the mean test time by 35% (from 12.6 to 8.2 minutes), owing to a reduction in the number of stimulus presentations. FASTPAC underestimated the mean deviation (MD) (Wilcoxon, p = 0.007) and corrected pattern standard deviation (CPSD) (Wilcoxon, p = 0.005). The sum of the differences between FASTPAC and the standard program was -1.19 (SD 2.37) dB for MD and 0.97 (2.14) dB for CPSD. The measured difference between the two methods was independent of the value of either MD or CPSD, indicating that the measurement error was just as likely to occur with either early or advanced visual field loss. No difference was noted in short term fluctuation or in the reliability indices of test performance. These results indicate that FASTPAC, while considerably faster, is not as accurate as the standard threshold program at measuring retinal sensitivity in glaucoma. This inaccuracy may be offset in practical terms by greater patient acceptability and by increasing the number of patients capable of performing reliable threshold perimetry because of the reduction in duration of the FASTPAC program.

摘要

Humphrey视野计的制造商开发了一种快速阈值程序FASTPAC,以解决与长时间视野检查相关的疲劳和测试表现不佳的问题。在44例青光眼患者中,将FASTPAC的表现与Humphrey视野分析仪的标准阈值程序(程序24-2)进行了比较。由于刺激呈现次数减少,FASTPAC将平均测试时间缩短了35%(从12.6分钟降至8.2分钟)。FASTPAC低估了平均偏差(MD)(Wilcoxon检验,p = 0.007)和校正模式标准差(CPSD)(Wilcoxon检验,p = 0.005)。FASTPAC与标准程序之间的差异总和,MD为-1.19(标准差2.37)dB,CPSD为0.97(2.14)dB。两种方法测得的差异与MD或CPSD的值无关,这表明在早期或晚期视野缺损时,测量误差同样可能发生。在短期波动或测试表现的可靠性指标方面未发现差异。这些结果表明,FASTPAC虽然速度快得多,但在测量青光眼患者的视网膜敏感度方面不如标准阈值程序准确。在实际应用中,由于FASTPAC程序持续时间缩短,患者接受度提高,能够进行可靠阈值视野检查的患者数量增加,这种不准确性可能会被抵消。

相似文献

6
Comparison between Fastpac and conventional Humphrey perimetry.
Aust N Z J Ophthalmol. 1994 May;22(2):95-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1442-9071.1994.tb00773.x.
8
Fastpac visual field screening.快速视野筛查
Ophthalmic Epidemiol. 1995 Dec;2(3):117-21. doi: 10.3109/09286589509057092.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验