Sood Rashmi, Makroo R N, Riana Vimarsh, Rosamma N L
Department of Transfusion Medicine at Artemis Health Institute, Gurgaon, India.
Asian J Transfus Sci. 2013 Jul;7(2):135-9. doi: 10.4103/0973-6247.115577.
Serological safety is an integral part of overall safety for blood banks. Emphasis is on the use of routinue Red Blood Cell (RBC) antibody screen test, at set time intervals, to reduce risks related to alloantibodies. Also emphasis is on importance of issuing antigen negative blood to alloantibody positive patients. Effect of using leucodepleted blood on the rate of alloimmunization is highlighted. The concept of provision of phenotypically matched blood is suggested.
Antibody screen test is important to select appropriate blood for transfusion. Repeat antibody screen testing, except if time interval between the earlier and subsequent transfusion was less than 72 hours, followed by antibody identification, if required, was performed in patients being treated with repeat multiple blood transfusions. Between February 2008 and June 2009, repeat samples of 306 multi-transfused patients were analyzed. Search for irregular antibodies and reading of results was conducted using RBC panels (three-cell panel of Column Agglutination Technology (CAT) and two cell panel of the Solid Phase Red Cell Adherence Technology (SPRCAT). Specificities of antibodies were investigated using appropriate panels, 11 cell panel of CAT and 16 cell panel of SPRCA. These technologies, detecting agglutination in columns and reactions in solid phase, evaluate the attachment of irregular incomplete antibody to antigen in the first phase of immunological reaction more directly and hence improve the reading of agglutination. Three to four log leuco reduced red blood cells were transfused to patients in the study using blood collection bags with integral filters.
Alloimmunization rate of 4.24% was detected from 306 multiply transfused patients tested and followed up. The Transfusion therapy may become significantly complicated.
Red cell antibody screening and identification and subsequent issue of antigen negative blood have a significant role in improving blood safety. Centers that have incorporated antibody screen test and identification have ensured safe transfusion. Identified patients should be flagged in a database and information shared. Such patients can be given carry-on cards and educated about the names of the identified antibodies. Full red cell phenotyping of individuals, patients and donors, can be feasibility.
血清学安全性是血库整体安全性的一个组成部分。重点在于定期进行常规红细胞(RBC)抗体筛查试验,以降低与同种抗体相关的风险。还强调了向同种抗体阳性患者输注抗原阴性血液的重要性。突出了使用白细胞滤除血液对同种免疫发生率的影响。提出了提供表型匹配血液的概念。
抗体筛查试验对于选择合适的输血用血很重要。对于接受多次重复输血治疗的患者,除了早期和后续输血间隔时间少于72小时外,均进行重复抗体筛查试验,必要时进行抗体鉴定。在2008年2月至2009年6月期间,对306例多次输血患者的重复样本进行了分析。使用红细胞板(柱凝集技术(CAT)的三细胞板和固相红细胞黏附技术(SPRCAT)的两细胞板)进行不规则抗体的检测和结果判读。使用合适的板(CAT的11细胞板和SPRCAT的16细胞板)研究抗体的特异性。这些技术通过检测柱内凝集和固相反应,更直接地评估免疫反应第一阶段不规则不完全抗体与抗原的结合,从而改善凝集的判读。使用带有整体过滤器的采血袋向研究中的患者输注三到四个对数级白细胞减少的红细胞。
在接受检测和随访的306例多次输血患者中,检测到同种免疫发生率为4.24%。输血治疗可能会变得明显复杂。
红细胞抗体筛查和鉴定以及随后输注抗原阴性血液在提高血液安全性方面具有重要作用。纳入抗体筛查试验和鉴定的中心确保了安全输血。应在数据库中标记已识别的患者并共享信息。可以给这些患者发放携带卡,并对他们进行已识别抗体名称的教育。对个体、患者和献血者进行全面的红细胞表型分析可能是可行的。