Joshi Rajesh Subhash
Department of Ophthalmology, Shri Vasantrao Naik Government Medical College, Yavatmal, Maharashtra, India.
Middle East Afr J Ophthalmol. 2013 Jul-Sep;20(3):221-4. doi: 10.4103/0974-9233.114795.
The purpose of this study was to compare the efficacy of a single drop of 0.5% proparacaine hydrochloride in uncomplicated cataract surgery with phacoemulsification.
Two hundred and ninety five patients scheduled for the phacoemulsification were divided into 2 groups based on the anesthetic agents they were to receive: 146 patients who received a single drop of 0.5% proparacaine 2 min before the start of the surgery (proparacaine group) and; 149 patients who received supplementation of 0.5% intracameral preservative free xylocaine (xylocaine group). A single surgeon performed all surgeries. Intraoperative and post-operative pain scores were evaluated on a visual analog scale. The surgeon noted his subjective impression of corneal clarity, discomfort while performing the surgery any supplemental anesthesia required and intraoperative complications. An anesthetist noted vital parameters and the need for intravenous sedation. Total surgical time was noted. Comparison of parameters was performed with the Chi-square test, and A P value less than 0.05 was considered as statistically significant.
No statistically significant difference was seen in the intraoperative (P = 0.24) and post-operative (P = 0.164) pain scores between groups. There was no pain (0 score) in 41.8% of patients in the proparacaine group and 46.3% of patients in the xylocaine group. The average surgical time (P = 0.279) and surgeon discomfort (P = 0.07) were not statistically significantly different between groups. No patients required supplemental anesthesia. There were no surgical complications that could compromise the visual outcome. An equal number of patients in both groups preferred same type of anesthetic technique for the fellow eye cataract surgery (89.11% for the proparacaine group and 90.18% for the xylocaine group). No patients in either group had changes in vital parameters or required intravenous sedation.
A single drop pre-operatively, of proparacaine hydrochloride was comparable to the intracameral supplementation of preservative free xylocaine for phacoemulsification in uncomplicated cataract surgery without compromising the visual outcome. However, we recommend individualizing the anesthetic technique according to the requirements of the surgeon.
本研究旨在比较单纯一滴0.5%盐酸丙美卡因在非复杂性白内障超声乳化手术中的疗效。
295例计划行超声乳化手术的患者,根据其将接受的麻醉剂分为2组:146例患者在手术开始前2分钟接受一滴0.5%盐酸丙美卡因(丙美卡因组);149例患者接受0.5%无前房内防腐剂的利多卡因补充(利多卡因组)。所有手术均由同一位外科医生进行。术中及术后疼痛评分采用视觉模拟量表进行评估。外科医生记录其对角膜清晰度的主观印象、手术过程中的不适感、任何所需的补充麻醉以及术中并发症。麻醉医生记录生命体征参数及静脉镇静的需求。记录总手术时间。参数比较采用卡方检验,P值小于0.05被认为具有统计学意义。
两组间术中(P = 0.24)及术后(P = 0.164)疼痛评分无统计学显著差异。丙美卡因组41.8%的患者和利多卡因组46.3%的患者无疼痛(0分)。两组间平均手术时间(P = 0.279)及外科医生不适感(P = 0.07)无统计学显著差异。无患者需要补充麻醉。没有可能影响视力结果的手术并发症。两组中同等数量的患者在对侧眼白内障手术中更喜欢相同类型的麻醉技术(丙美卡因组为89.11%,利多卡因组为90.18%)。两组中均无患者生命体征参数发生变化或需要静脉镇静。
在非复杂性白内障手术的超声乳化中,术前单纯一滴盐酸丙美卡因与无前房内防腐剂的利多卡因前房内补充效果相当,且不影响视力结果。然而,我们建议根据外科医生的要求个体化麻醉技术。