Department of Internal Medicine, Federal Teaching Hospital, Abakaliki, Ebonyi State, Nigeria.
PLoS One. 2013 Aug 27;8(8):e73134. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0073134. eCollection 2013.
Poverty is both a cause and consequence of tuberculosis. The objective of this study is to quantify patient/household costs for an episode of tuberculosis (TB), its relationships with household impoverishment, and the strategies used to cope with the costs by TB patients in a resource-limited high TB/HIV setting.
A cross-sectional study was conducted in three rural hospitals in southeast Nigeria. Consecutive adults with newly diagnosed pulmonary TB were interviewed to determine the costs each incurred in their care-seeking pathway using a standardised questionnaire. We defined direct costs as out-of-pocket payments, and indirect costs as lost income.
Of 452 patients enrolled, majority were male 55% (249), and rural residents 79% (356), with a mean age of 34 (± 11.6) years. Median direct pre-diagnosis/diagnosis cost was $49 per patient. Median direct treatment cost was $36 per patient. Indirect pre-diagnostic and treatment costs were $416, or 79% of total patient costs, $528. The median total cost of TB care per household was $592; corresponding to 37% of median annual household income pre-TB. Most patients reported having to borrow money 212(47%), sell assets 42(9%), or both 144(32%) to cope with the cost of care. Following an episode of TB, household income reduced increasing the proportion of households classified as poor from 54% to 79%. Before TB illness, independent predictors of household poverty were; rural residence (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 2.8), HIV-positive status (aOR 4.8), and care-seeking at a private facility (aOR 5.1). After TB care, independent determinants of household poverty were; younger age (≤ 35 years; aOR 2.4), male gender (aOR 2.1), and HIV-positive status (aOR 2.5).
Patient and household costs for TB care are potentially catastrophic even where services are provided free-of-charge. There is an urgent need to implement strategies for TB care that are affordable for the poor.
贫困既是结核病的一个成因,也是其后果。本研究旨在量化结核病(TB)发病过程中患者/家庭的费用,以及这些费用与家庭贫困之间的关系,并探讨资源有限的高结核/艾滋病毒环境中结核病患者应对这些费用的策略。
在尼日利亚东南部的三家农村医院进行了一项横断面研究。对连续确诊的新发肺结核成年患者进行访谈,使用标准化问卷确定他们在寻求治疗过程中所产生的费用。我们将直接费用定义为自付费用,将间接费用定义为收入损失。
共纳入 452 名患者,其中大多数为男性(55%,249 人)和农村居民(79%,356 人),平均年龄为 34(±11.6)岁。每位患者的直接预诊断/诊断费用中位数为 49 美元。每位患者的直接治疗费用中位数为 36 美元。预诊断和治疗的间接费用为 416 美元,占患者总费用的 79%,即 528 美元。每个家庭治疗结核病的总费用中位数为 592 美元;相当于结核病前家庭年收入中位数的 37%。大多数患者报告说,他们不得不借钱(212 人,47%)、出售资产(42 人,9%)或两者兼而有之(144 人,32%)来支付治疗费用。在结核病发作后,家庭收入减少,导致被归类为贫困家庭的比例从 54%增加到 79%。在结核病发生前,家庭贫困的独立预测因素为:农村居民(调整后的优势比[aOR]2.8)、艾滋病毒阳性(aOR 4.8)和在私立机构就诊(aOR 5.1)。在结核病治疗后,家庭贫困的独立决定因素为:年龄≤35 岁(aOR 2.4)、男性(aOR 2.1)和艾滋病毒阳性(aOR 2.5)。
即使在免费提供服务的情况下,结核病患者和家庭的治疗费用也可能是灾难性的。迫切需要为贫困人口实施负担得起的结核病治疗策略。