Suppr超能文献

治疗决策和丙型肝炎的当代与待处理治疗方法。

Treatment decisions and contemporary versus pending treatments for hepatitis C.

机构信息

UCL Institute for Liver and Digestive Health, Royal Free London NHS Foundation Trust, Rowland Hill Street, London NW3 2PF, UK.

出版信息

Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2013 Dec;10(12):713-28. doi: 10.1038/nrgastro.2013.163. Epub 2013 Sep 10.

Abstract

The primary aim of antiviral therapy for chronic hepatitis C (CHC) is the prevention of progressive disease. A response to interferon (IFN) treatment is associated with an improvement in all-cause mortality and liver-related mortality from hepatitis C. Unless contraindicated, patients with CHC are thus potential candidates for treatment. Improved response rates are observed in patients with HCV genotype 1 infection treated with first-generation protease inhibitors. However, treatment with current first-generation protease inhibitors and IFN is complex and can result in appreciable adverse effects. The advent of potent, pan-genotypic all-oral direct-acting antiviral (DAA) regimens necessitates a critical examination of the immediate application of PEG-IFN, ribavirin and DAA regimens in patients with CHC. Current guidelines and position statements do not make clear recommendations, and are behind the emerging data. Some aspects of the conundrums facing physicians and patients are summarized in this Review. Cirrhosis presents an immediate threat of disease, and ideally treatment should be targeted at those patients who have advancing or advanced disease; unfortunately, a disparity exists, as response rates are reduced in patients with cirrhosis and the risks of adverse events are increased. On balance, patients with mild disease could consider deferring treatment.

摘要

慢性丙型肝炎(CHC)抗病毒治疗的主要目的是预防疾病进展。干扰素(IFN)治疗应答与丙型肝炎相关的全因死亡率和肝脏相关死亡率的改善相关。除非有禁忌症,否则 CHC 患者都是治疗的潜在候选者。第一代蛋白酶抑制剂治疗 HCV 基因型 1 感染患者的应答率有所提高。然而,目前第一代蛋白酶抑制剂和 IFN 的治疗复杂,会导致明显的不良反应。高效、泛基因型全口服直接作用抗病毒(DAA)方案的出现,需要对 PEG-IFN、利巴韦林和 DAA 方案在 CHC 患者中的即时应用进行严格审查。目前的指南和立场声明没有明确的建议,而且落后于新出现的数据。该综述总结了医生和患者面临的一些难题。肝硬化立即存在疾病威胁,理想情况下,治疗应针对进展期或晚期疾病患者;但遗憾的是,存在差异,因为肝硬化患者的应答率降低,不良反应风险增加。总的来说,轻度疾病患者可以考虑推迟治疗。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验