• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

医疗损失调节对健康保险公司财务绩效的影响。

Impact of medical loss regulation on the financial performance of health insurers.

出版信息

Health Aff (Millwood). 2013 Sep;32(9):1546-51. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2012.1316.

DOI:10.1377/hlthaff.2012.1316
PMID:24019358
Abstract

The Affordable Care Act's regulation of medical loss ratios requires health insurers to use at least 80-85 percent of the premiums they collect for direct medical expenses (care delivery) or for efforts to improve the quality of care. To gauge this rule's effect on insurers' financial performance, we measured changes between 2010 and 2011 in key financial ratios reflecting insurers' operating profits, administrative costs, and medical claims. We found that the largest changes occurred in the individual market, where for-profit insurers reduced their median administrative cost ratio and operating margin by more than two percentage points each, resulting in a seven-percentage-point increase in their median medical loss ratio. Financial ratios changed much less for insurers in the small- and large-group markets.

摘要

平价医疗法案对医疗费用赔付率的规定要求健康保险公司将所收取的保费至少 80%-85%用于直接医疗费用(医疗服务提供)或用于提高医疗服务质量的努力。为了评估该规定对保险公司财务业绩的影响,我们衡量了 2010 年至 2011 年期间反映保险公司营业利润、管理费用和医疗理赔的关键财务比率的变化。我们发现,最大的变化发生在个人市场,营利性保险公司将其管理费用比率和营业利润率中位数降低了两个以上百分点,导致其医疗费用赔付率中位数增加了七个百分点。小型和大型团体市场的保险公司的财务比率变化要小得多。

相似文献

1
Impact of medical loss regulation on the financial performance of health insurers.医疗损失调节对健康保险公司财务绩效的影响。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2013 Sep;32(9):1546-51. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2012.1316.
2
How has the Affordable Care Act's medical loss ratio regulation affected insurer behavior?平价医疗法案的医疗损失率规定如何影响保险公司的行为?
Med Care. 2014 Apr;52(4):370-7. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000000091.
3
Insurers' responses to regulation of medical loss ratios.保险公司对医疗损失率监管的回应。
Issue Brief (Commonw Fund). 2012 Dec;26:1-13.
4
Health insurers' financial performance and quality improvement expenditures in the Affordable Care Act's second year.《平价医疗法案》第二年中健康保险公司的财务表现及质量改善支出
Med Care Res Rev. 2015 Feb;72(1):113-22. doi: 10.1177/1077558714563172. Epub 2014 Dec 18.
5
Insurers' medical loss ratios and quality improvement spending in 2011.2011年保险公司的医疗损失率及质量改进支出。
Issue Brief (Commonw Fund). 2013 Mar;14:1-9.
6
Costs, commitment and locality: a comparison of for-profit and not-for-profit health plans.成本、承诺与地区性:营利性与非营利性健康保险计划的比较
Inquiry. 2004 Summer;41(2):116-29. doi: 10.5034/inquiryjrnl_41.2.116.
7
The federal medical loss ratio rule: implications for consumers in year 3.联邦医疗损失率规则:对第三年消费者的影响。
Issue Brief (Commonw Fund). 2015 Mar;6:1-11.
8
Is the medical loss ratio a good target measure for regulation in the individual market for health insurance?医疗损失率是否是医疗保险个人市场监管的一个良好目标衡量指标?
Health Econ. 2015 Jan;24(1):55-74. doi: 10.1002/hec.3002. Epub 2013 Oct 4.
9
THE AFFORDABLE CARE ACT AND MEDICAL LOSS RATIOS: NO IMPACT IN FIRST THREE YEARS.《平价医疗法案》与医疗损失率:头三年无影响
Int J Health Serv. 2015;45(1):127-31. doi: 10.2190/HS.45.1.i.
10
Estimating the impact of the medical loss ratio rule: a state-by-state analysis.评估医疗损失率规则的影响:逐州分析
Issue Brief (Commonw Fund). 2012 Apr;7:1-14.

引用本文的文献

1
The effects of coding intensity in Medicare Advantage on plan benefits and finances.医疗保险优势计划中编码强度对计划福利和财务的影响。
Health Serv Res. 2021 Apr;56(2):178-187. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.13591. Epub 2020 Nov 9.