• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

联邦医疗损失率规则:对第三年消费者的影响。

The federal medical loss ratio rule: implications for consumers in year 3.

作者信息

McCue Michael J, Hall Mark A

机构信息

Department of Health Administration, School of Allied Health Professions, Virginia Commonwealth University.

出版信息

Issue Brief (Commonw Fund). 2015 Mar;6:1-11.

PMID:25890979
Abstract

For the past three years, the Affordable Care Act has required health insurers to pay out a minimum percentage of premiums in medical claims or quality improvement expenses--known as a medical loss ratio (MLR). Insurers with MLRs below the minimum must rebate the difference to consumers. This issue brief finds that total rebates for 2013 were $325 million, less than one-third the amount paid out in 2011, indicating much greater compliance with the MLR rule. Insurers' spending on quality improvement remained low, at less than 1 percent of premiums. Insurers' administrative and sales costs, such as brokers' fees, and profit margins have reduced slightly but remain fairly steady. In the first three years under this regulation, total consumer benefits related to the medical loss ratio--both rebates and reduced overhead--amounted to over $5 billion. This was achieved without a great exodus of insurers from the market.

摘要

在过去三年里,《平价医疗法案》要求健康保险公司在医疗理赔或质量改进费用方面支付最低比例的保费,这一比例被称为医疗损失率(MLR)。医疗损失率低于最低标准的保险公司必须将差额返还给消费者。本问题简报发现,2013年的总返还金额为3.25亿美元,不到2011年支付金额的三分之一,这表明保险公司对医疗损失率规则的遵守程度大大提高。保险公司在质量改进方面的支出仍然很低,不到保费的1%。保险公司的行政和销售成本,如经纪费和利润率略有下降,但仍相当稳定。在该法规实施的头三年里,与医疗损失率相关的消费者总受益——包括返还金额和减少的间接费用——超过了50亿美元。这一成果的实现并未导致大量保险公司退出市场。

相似文献

1
The federal medical loss ratio rule: implications for consumers in year 3.联邦医疗损失率规则:对第三年消费者的影响。
Issue Brief (Commonw Fund). 2015 Mar;6:1-11.
2
The federal medical loss ratio rule: implications for consumers in year 2.联邦医疗损失率规则:对第二年消费者的影响。
Issue Brief (Commonw Fund). 2014 May;8:1-9.
3
Insurers' medical loss ratios and quality improvement spending in 2011.2011年保险公司的医疗损失率及质量改进支出。
Issue Brief (Commonw Fund). 2013 Mar;14:1-9.
4
Estimating the impact of the medical loss ratio rule: a state-by-state analysis.评估医疗损失率规则的影响:逐州分析
Issue Brief (Commonw Fund). 2012 Apr;7:1-14.
5
How has the Affordable Care Act's medical loss ratio regulation affected insurer behavior?平价医疗法案的医疗损失率规定如何影响保险公司的行为?
Med Care. 2014 Apr;52(4):370-7. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000000091.
6
Insurers' responses to regulation of medical loss ratios.保险公司对医疗损失率监管的回应。
Issue Brief (Commonw Fund). 2012 Dec;26:1-13.
7
Health insurers' financial performance and quality improvement expenditures in the Affordable Care Act's second year.《平价医疗法案》第二年中健康保险公司的财务表现及质量改善支出
Med Care Res Rev. 2015 Feb;72(1):113-22. doi: 10.1177/1077558714563172. Epub 2014 Dec 18.
8
Is the medical loss ratio a good target measure for regulation in the individual market for health insurance?医疗损失率是否是医疗保险个人市场监管的一个良好目标衡量指标?
Health Econ. 2015 Jan;24(1):55-74. doi: 10.1002/hec.3002. Epub 2013 Oct 4.
9
Medical loss ratio regulation under the Affordable Care Act.《平价医疗法案》下的医疗损失率监管。
Inquiry. 2013 Spring;50(1):9-26. doi: 10.5034/inquiryjrnl_50.01.05.
10
THE AFFORDABLE CARE ACT AND MEDICAL LOSS RATIOS: NO IMPACT IN FIRST THREE YEARS.《平价医疗法案》与医疗损失率:头三年无影响
Int J Health Serv. 2015;45(1):127-31. doi: 10.2190/HS.45.1.i.