• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

2011年保险公司的医疗损失率及质量改进支出。

Insurers' medical loss ratios and quality improvement spending in 2011.

作者信息

Hall Mark A, McCue Michael J

机构信息

Wake Forest University School of Law and School of Medicine, USA.

出版信息

Issue Brief (Commonw Fund). 2013 Mar;14:1-9.

PMID:23547337
Abstract

The Affordable Care Act's medical loss ratio (MLR) regulation requires insurers to spend 80 percent or 85 percent of premiums on medical claims and quality improvements. In 2011, insurers falling below this minimum paid more than $1 billion in rebates. This brief examines how insurers spend their premium dollars--particularly their investment in quality improvement activities--focusing on differences among insurers based on corporate traits. In the aggregate, insurers paid less than 1 percent of premiums on either MLR rebates or quality improvement activities in 2011, with amounts varying by insurer type. Publicly traded insurers had significantly lower MLRs in each market segment (individual, small group, and large group), and were more likely to owe a rebate in most segments compared with non-publicly traded insurers. The median quality improvement expenditure per member among nonprofit and provider-sponsored insurers was more than the median among for-profit and non-provider-sponsored insurers.

摘要

《平价医疗法案》的医疗损失率(MLR)规定要求保险公司将保费的80%或85%用于医疗理赔和质量改进。2011年,未达到这一最低标准的保险公司支付了超过10亿美元的回扣。本简报探讨了保险公司如何使用保费资金,特别是他们在质量改进活动上的投入,重点关注基于公司特征的保险公司之间的差异。总体而言,2011年保险公司在MLR回扣或质量改进活动上的支出不到保费的1%,支出金额因保险公司类型而异。在每个市场细分领域(个人、小团体和大团体),上市保险公司的MLR显著较低,与非上市保险公司相比,在大多数细分领域更有可能支付回扣。非营利性和提供者赞助的保险公司中,每位成员的质量改进支出中位数高于营利性和非提供者赞助的保险公司。

相似文献

1
Insurers' medical loss ratios and quality improvement spending in 2011.2011年保险公司的医疗损失率及质量改进支出。
Issue Brief (Commonw Fund). 2013 Mar;14:1-9.
2
The federal medical loss ratio rule: implications for consumers in year 3.联邦医疗损失率规则:对第三年消费者的影响。
Issue Brief (Commonw Fund). 2015 Mar;6:1-11.
3
Insurers' responses to regulation of medical loss ratios.保险公司对医疗损失率监管的回应。
Issue Brief (Commonw Fund). 2012 Dec;26:1-13.
4
Health insurers' financial performance and quality improvement expenditures in the Affordable Care Act's second year.《平价医疗法案》第二年中健康保险公司的财务表现及质量改善支出
Med Care Res Rev. 2015 Feb;72(1):113-22. doi: 10.1177/1077558714563172. Epub 2014 Dec 18.
5
How has the Affordable Care Act's medical loss ratio regulation affected insurer behavior?平价医疗法案的医疗损失率规定如何影响保险公司的行为?
Med Care. 2014 Apr;52(4):370-7. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000000091.
6
The federal medical loss ratio rule: implications for consumers in year 2.联邦医疗损失率规则:对第二年消费者的影响。
Issue Brief (Commonw Fund). 2014 May;8:1-9.
7
Estimating the impact of the medical loss ratio rule: a state-by-state analysis.评估医疗损失率规则的影响:逐州分析
Issue Brief (Commonw Fund). 2012 Apr;7:1-14.
8
Impact of medical loss regulation on the financial performance of health insurers.医疗损失调节对健康保险公司财务绩效的影响。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2013 Sep;32(9):1546-51. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2012.1316.
9
Medical loss ratio regulation under the Affordable Care Act.《平价医疗法案》下的医疗损失率监管。
Inquiry. 2013 Spring;50(1):9-26. doi: 10.5034/inquiryjrnl_50.01.05.
10
The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act's provisions regarding medical loss ratios and quality: evidence from Texas.
J Health Care Finance. 2013 Fall;40(1):1-10.