Sampath Santhosh, Mittal Bhagwant Rai, Arun Sasikumar, Sood Ashwani, Bhattacharya Anish, Sharma Aman
Department of Nuclear Medicine and Positron Emission Tomography, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India.
Indian J Nucl Med. 2013 Jan;28(1):11-6. doi: 10.4103/0972-3919.116798.
Complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS) is primarily a clinical diagnosis. Diagnostic imaging in CRPS can be used, especially to exclude other disorders. The sensitivity and specificity of three phase bone scintigraphy (TPBS) for the diagnosis of CRPS is variable throughout the literature.
To establish a simple and effective quantitative approach to help in the diagnosis of CRPS by TPBS.
TPBS done in patients (n = 68) with suspected CRPS was analyzed retrospectively. They were classified into bone scan positive group (BSP), bone scan negative group (BSN) and non-CRPS group based on diffusely increased periarticular uptake, symmetrical uptake, and focal uptake respectively. Asymmetry score (AS) was also measured between the affected and unaffected side.
16 patients showed focal uptake, 37 were in BSP group with mean AS score of 1.57 ± 0.5 and 15 were in BSN group with mean AS score of 1.01 ± 0.05. The mean AS was significantly different (P < 0.0001). AS of 1.06 had sensitivity and specificity of 96.43% and 100% respectively (P = 0.0001). There was a trend of negative correlation between the AS and the duration, r = -0.21; however, it was not statistically significant (P = 0.28).
TPBS should be considered in the evaluation of CRPS to rule out patients who have focal involvement, not diagnostic of CRPS (~24% in this study). Quantitative AS of 1.06 can be included to support visual interpretation in the delayed phase.
复杂性区域疼痛综合征(CRPS)主要是一种临床诊断。CRPS的诊断性影像学检查可用于,尤其是用于排除其他疾病。三相骨闪烁显像(TPBS)对CRPS诊断的敏感性和特异性在整个文献中各不相同。
建立一种简单有效的定量方法,以帮助通过TPBS诊断CRPS。
对68例疑似CRPS患者进行的TPBS检查进行回顾性分析。根据关节周围弥漫性摄取增加、对称性摄取和局灶性摄取,将他们分别分为骨扫描阳性组(BSP)、骨扫描阴性组(BSN)和非CRPS组。还测量了患侧与未患侧之间的不对称评分(AS)。
16例患者表现为局灶性摄取,37例在BSP组,平均AS评分为1.57±0.5,15例在BSN组,平均AS评分为1.01±0.05。平均AS有显著差异(P<0.0001)。AS为1.06时,敏感性和特异性分别为96.43%和100%(P = 0.0001)。AS与病程之间存在负相关趋势,r = -0.21;然而,差异无统计学意义(P = 0.28)。
在评估CRPS时应考虑TPBS,以排除有局灶性受累、不能诊断为CRPS的患者(本研究中约为24%)。在延迟期可纳入AS为1.06的定量结果以支持视觉解读。