Department of Clinical Molecular Biology and Laboratory Sciences, Akershus University Hospital, Lørenskog, Norway ; Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
PLoS One. 2013 Aug 30;8(8):e72692. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0072692. eCollection 2013.
Treatment of metastatic malignant melanoma patients harboring BRAF(V600E) has improved drastically after the discovery of the BRAF inhibitor, vemurafenib. However, drug resistance is a recurring problem, and prognoses are still very bad for patients harboring BRAF wild-type. Better markers for targeted therapy are therefore urgently needed.
In this study, we assessed the individual kinase activity profiles in 26 tumor samples obtained from patients with metastatic malignant melanoma using peptide arrays with 144 kinase substrates. In addition, we studied the overall ex-vivo inhibitory effects of vemurafenib and sunitinib on kinase activity status.
Overall kinase activity was significantly higher in lysates from melanoma tumors compared to normal skin tissue. Furthermore, ex-vivo incubation with both vemurafenib and sunitinib caused significant decrease in phosphorylation of kinase substrates, i.e kinase activity. While basal phosphorylation profiles were similar in BRAF wild-type and BRAF(V600E) tumors, analysis with ex-vivo vemurafenib treatment identified a subset of 40 kinase substrates showing stronger inhibition in BRAF(V600E) tumor lysates, distinguishing the BRAF wild-type and BRAF(V600E) tumors. Interestingly, a few BRAF wild-type tumors showed inhibition profiles similar to BRAF(V600E) tumors. The kinase inhibitory effect of vemurafenib was subsequently analyzed in cell lines harboring different BRAF mutational status with various vemurafenib sensitivity in-vitro.
Our findings suggest that multiplex kinase substrate array analysis give valuable information about overall tumor kinase activity. Furthermore, intra-assay exposure to kinase inhibiting drugs may provide a useful tool to study mechanisms of resistance, as well as to identify predictive markers.
BRAF 抑制剂维莫非尼的发现极大地改善了携带 BRAF(V600E)的转移性恶性黑色素瘤患者的治疗效果。然而,耐药性是一个反复出现的问题,携带 BRAF 野生型的患者的预后仍然非常差。因此,迫切需要更好的靶向治疗标志物。
在这项研究中,我们使用包含 144 种激酶底物的肽阵列评估了 26 个来自转移性恶性黑色素瘤患者的肿瘤样本的个体激酶活性谱。此外,我们研究了维莫非尼和舒尼替尼对激酶活性状态的整体体外抑制作用。
与正常皮肤组织相比,黑色素瘤肿瘤的裂解物中的总体激酶活性明显更高。此外,体外孵育维莫非尼和舒尼替尼均导致激酶底物磷酸化的显著减少,即激酶活性。虽然 BRAF 野生型和 BRAF(V600E)肿瘤的基础磷酸化谱相似,但用体外维莫非尼治疗分析确定了一组 40 种激酶底物,它们在 BRAF(V600E)肿瘤裂解物中表现出更强的抑制作用,从而区分了 BRAF 野生型和 BRAF(V600E)肿瘤。有趣的是,一些 BRAF 野生型肿瘤表现出与 BRAF(V600E)肿瘤相似的抑制谱。随后,在体外具有不同 BRAF 突变状态和不同维莫非尼敏感性的细胞系中分析了维莫非尼的激酶抑制作用。
我们的发现表明,多重激酶底物阵列分析提供了有关总体肿瘤激酶活性的有价值信息。此外,对激酶抑制药物的室内暴露可能是研究耐药机制以及识别预测标志物的有用工具。