Kloek Corelien J J, Bossen Daniël, Veenhof Cindy, van Dongen Johanna M, Dekker Joost, de Bakker Dinny H
Tilburg University, Tranzo, PO Box 90153, Tilburg, LE, 5000, The Netherlands.
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2014 Aug 8;15:269. doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-15-269.
BACKGROUND: Exercise therapy in patients with hip and/or knee osteoarthritis is effective in reducing pain, increasing physical activity and physical functioning, but costly and a burden for the health care budget. A web-based intervention is cheap in comparison to face-to-face exercise therapy and has the advantage of supporting in home exercises because of the 24/7 accessibility. However, the lack of face-to-face contact with a professional is a disadvantage of web-based interventions and is probably one of the reasons for low adherence rates. In order to combine the best of two worlds, we have developed the intervention e-Exercise. In this blended intervention face-to-face contacts with a physical therapist are partially replaced by a web-based exercise intervention. The aim of this study is to investigate the short- (3 months) and long-term (12 months) (cost)-effectiveness of e-Exercise compared to usual care physical therapy. Our hypothesis is that e-Exercise is more effective and cost-effective in increasing physical functioning and physical activity compared to usual care. METHODS/DESIGN: This paper presents the protocol of a prospective, single-blinded, multicenter cluster randomized controlled trial. In total, 200 patients with OA of the hip and/or knee will be randomly allocated into either e-Exercise or usual care (physical therapy). E-Exercise is a 12-week intervention, consisting of maximum five face-to-face physical therapy contacts supplemented with a web-based program. The web-based program contains assignments to gradually increase patients' physical activity, strength and stability exercises and information about OA related topics. Primary outcomes are physical activity and physical functioning. Secondary outcomes are health related quality of life, self-perceived effect, pain, tiredness and self-efficacy. All measurements will be performed at baseline, 3 and 12 months after inclusion. Retrospective cost questionnaires will be sent at 3, 6, 9 and 12 months and used for the cost-effectiveness and cost-utility analysis. DISCUSSION: This study is the first randomized controlled trial in the (cost)-effectiveness of a blended exercise intervention for patients with osteoarthritis of the hip and/or knee. The findings will help to improve the treatment of patients with osteoarthritis. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NTR4224.
背景:髋部和/或膝部骨关节炎患者的运动疗法在减轻疼痛、增加身体活动和身体机能方面有效,但成本高昂,给医疗保健预算带来负担。与面对面运动疗法相比,基于网络的干预成本较低,且由于可全天候访问,具有支持家庭锻炼的优势。然而,缺乏与专业人员的面对面接触是基于网络干预的一个缺点,可能也是依从率低的原因之一。为了兼取二者之长,我们开发了电子运动干预措施。在这种混合干预中,与物理治疗师的面对面接触部分被基于网络的运动干预所取代。本研究的目的是调查与常规护理物理治疗相比,电子运动干预在短期(3个月)和长期(12个月)的(成本)效益。我们的假设是,与常规护理相比,电子运动干预在提高身体机能和身体活动方面更有效且更具成本效益。 方法/设计:本文介绍了一项前瞻性、单盲、多中心整群随机对照试验的方案。总共200名髋部和/或膝部骨关节炎患者将被随机分配到电子运动干预组或常规护理(物理治疗)组。电子运动干预为期12周,包括最多五次面对面物理治疗接触,并辅以基于网络的程序。基于网络的程序包含逐步增加患者身体活动、力量和稳定性锻炼的任务,以及与骨关节炎相关主题的信息。主要结局是身体活动和身体机能。次要结局是与健康相关的生活质量、自我感知效果、疼痛、疲劳和自我效能感。所有测量将在纳入后的基线、3个月和12个月进行。回顾性成本问卷将在3、6、9和12个月发送,并用于成本效益和成本效用分析。 讨论:本研究是第一项关于髋部和/或膝部骨关节炎患者混合运动干预(成本)效益方面的随机对照试验。研究结果将有助于改善骨关节炎患者所接受的治疗。 试验注册:NTR4224
Health Technol Assess. 2005-8
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024-12-3
Arch Physiother. 2021-5-27
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2020-10-6
Exp Ther Med. 2020-1
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014-4-22
J Med Internet Res. 2012-11-14
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2012-4-30