a MIT Laboratory, Department of Psychology , University of Central Florida , 4000 Central Florida Boulevard, Suite 301D, Orlando , FL 32816 , USA.
Ergonomics. 2014;57(3):449-54. doi: 10.1080/00140139.2013.816375. Epub 2013 Sep 12.
The headlong rush to automate continues apace. The dominant question still remains whether we can automate, not whether we should automate. However, it is this latter question that is featured and considered explicitly here. The suggestion offered is that unlimited automation of all technical functions will eventually prove anathema to the fundamental quality of human life. Examples of tasks, pursuits and past-times that should potentially be excused from the automation imperative are discussed. This deliberation leads us back to the question of balance in the cooperation, coordination and potential conflict between humans and the machines they create.
自动化的迅猛发展仍在继续。主导问题仍然是我们是否可以自动化,而不是我们是否应该自动化。然而,正是后一个问题在这里被明确提出和考虑。这里提出的建议是,所有技术功能的无限自动化最终将对人类生活的基本质量产生反感。讨论了应该免除自动化要求的任务、追求和娱乐活动的例子。这种思考使我们回到了人类与他们创造的机器之间的合作、协调和潜在冲突中的平衡问题。