Suppr超能文献

椎动脉和基底动脉:经颅彩色编码双功超声与传统经颅多普勒超声在检测血管狭窄方面的比较

Vertebral and Basilar Arteries: Transcranial Color-Coded Duplex Ultrasonography versus Conventional TCD in Detection of Narrowings.

作者信息

Arkuszewski M, Swiat M, Hurst R W, Weigele J B, Al-Okaili R N, Kasner S E, Melhem E R, Krejza J

机构信息

Department of Radiology, Division of Neuroradiology, University of Pennsylvania; Philadelphia, PA, USA - Department of Neurology, Medical University of Silesia; Katowice, Poland -

出版信息

Neuroradiol J. 2012 Nov;25(5):509-14. doi: 10.1177/197140091202500502. Epub 2012 Nov 9.

Abstract

We prospectively compared the accuracies of conventional transcranial Doppler ultrasound (TCD) and transcranial color-coded duplex sonography (TCCS) in the diagnosis of narrowing of the basilar (BA) and vertebral arteries (VA). Fifty-six consecutive patients (mean age 55.8 years; 34 women) after subarachnoid hemorrhage (n=46), stroke or transient ischemic attack (n=5), and for other reasons (n=5) underwent on the same day TCD, TCCS and the intra-arterial digital subtraction angiography (DSA) - the reference standard. The accuracy of peak-systolic (VPS), mean (VM), and end-diastolic velocities (VED) in detection of any arterial narrowing was estimated using the receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curve methodology and the total area (Az) under the curve. Accuracy of TCCS in detection of VA narrowing based on VPS and VM measurements was significantly higher than accuracy of TCD (Az=0.65 for VPS and Az=0.62 for VM versus Az=0.51 and Az=0.50, respectively, p<0.05 for both). Accuracy of TCCS in detection of BA narrowing was also higher than accuracy of TCD based on VPS measurements (Az=0.69 versus Az=0.50, respectively), with a trend toward significant difference, p=0.085. The accuracy of TCCS is superior to accuracy of TCD in detection of narrowings of vertebral and basilar arteries, thus TCCS should be preferred in routine clinical practice.

摘要

我们前瞻性地比较了传统经颅多普勒超声(TCD)和经颅彩色编码双功超声(TCCS)在诊断基底动脉(BA)和椎动脉(VA)狭窄方面的准确性。56例连续患者(平均年龄55.8岁;34名女性),其中蛛网膜下腔出血患者46例、中风或短暂性脑缺血发作患者5例以及因其他原因就诊的患者5例,于同一天接受了TCD、TCCS检查以及作为参考标准的动脉内数字减影血管造影(DSA)检查。使用受试者操作特征(ROC)曲线方法和曲线下总面积(Az)评估收缩期峰值速度(VPS)、平均速度(VM)和舒张末期速度(VED)检测任何动脉狭窄的准确性。基于VPS和VM测量,TCCS检测VA狭窄的准确性显著高于TCD(VPS的Az = 0.65,VM的Az = 0.62,而TCD分别为Az = 0.51和Az = 0.50,两者p均<0.05)。基于VPS测量,TCCS检测BA狭窄的准确性也高于TCD(分别为Az = 0.69和Az = 0.50),有显著差异趋势,p = 0.085。在检测椎动脉和基底动脉狭窄方面,TCCS的准确性优于TCD,因此在常规临床实践中应首选TCCS。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验