Arkuszewski M, Swiat M, Hurst R W, Weigele J B, Al-Okaili R N, Kasner S E, Melhem E R, Krejza J
Department of Radiology, Division of Neuroradiology, University of Pennsylvania; Philadelphia, PA, USA - Department of Neurology, Medical University of Silesia; Katowice, Poland -
Neuroradiol J. 2012 Nov;25(5):509-14. doi: 10.1177/197140091202500502. Epub 2012 Nov 9.
We prospectively compared the accuracies of conventional transcranial Doppler ultrasound (TCD) and transcranial color-coded duplex sonography (TCCS) in the diagnosis of narrowing of the basilar (BA) and vertebral arteries (VA). Fifty-six consecutive patients (mean age 55.8 years; 34 women) after subarachnoid hemorrhage (n=46), stroke or transient ischemic attack (n=5), and for other reasons (n=5) underwent on the same day TCD, TCCS and the intra-arterial digital subtraction angiography (DSA) - the reference standard. The accuracy of peak-systolic (VPS), mean (VM), and end-diastolic velocities (VED) in detection of any arterial narrowing was estimated using the receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curve methodology and the total area (Az) under the curve. Accuracy of TCCS in detection of VA narrowing based on VPS and VM measurements was significantly higher than accuracy of TCD (Az=0.65 for VPS and Az=0.62 for VM versus Az=0.51 and Az=0.50, respectively, p<0.05 for both). Accuracy of TCCS in detection of BA narrowing was also higher than accuracy of TCD based on VPS measurements (Az=0.69 versus Az=0.50, respectively), with a trend toward significant difference, p=0.085. The accuracy of TCCS is superior to accuracy of TCD in detection of narrowings of vertebral and basilar arteries, thus TCCS should be preferred in routine clinical practice.
我们前瞻性地比较了传统经颅多普勒超声(TCD)和经颅彩色编码双功超声(TCCS)在诊断基底动脉(BA)和椎动脉(VA)狭窄方面的准确性。56例连续患者(平均年龄55.8岁;34名女性),其中蛛网膜下腔出血患者46例、中风或短暂性脑缺血发作患者5例以及因其他原因就诊的患者5例,于同一天接受了TCD、TCCS检查以及作为参考标准的动脉内数字减影血管造影(DSA)检查。使用受试者操作特征(ROC)曲线方法和曲线下总面积(Az)评估收缩期峰值速度(VPS)、平均速度(VM)和舒张末期速度(VED)检测任何动脉狭窄的准确性。基于VPS和VM测量,TCCS检测VA狭窄的准确性显著高于TCD(VPS的Az = 0.65,VM的Az = 0.62,而TCD分别为Az = 0.51和Az = 0.50,两者p均<0.05)。基于VPS测量,TCCS检测BA狭窄的准确性也高于TCD(分别为Az = 0.69和Az = 0.50),有显著差异趋势,p = 0.085。在检测椎动脉和基底动脉狭窄方面,TCCS的准确性优于TCD,因此在常规临床实践中应首选TCCS。