Treatment Research Institute, Philadelphia, PA 19106, USA.
J Subst Abuse Treat. 2014 Jan;46(1):15-21. doi: 10.1016/j.jsat.2013.08.001. Epub 2013 Sep 9.
Public schools are not traditional locations where screening, brief motivational counseling intervention and referral to treatment (SBIRT) are provided. This translational research study aimed to test the feasibility of conducting SBIRT in two urban New York schools and to examine its economic sustainability. In Spring 2012, 248 students were screened during non-academic classes: 42% of them (n=105) reported substance use (versus 28% reported in school-wide, paper anonymous survey). All but one of the positively screened students voluntarily accepted one or more brief intervention sessions and two students were referred to treatment. This school-based SBIRT model did not interfere with academic activities, was feasible to implement, and was attractive to students, teachers and administration. The data offer clear indication that further effectiveness testing is warranted and potentially valuable, however the sustainability of this model was not supported due to our lack of obtaining insurance information, authorization and reimbursement.
公立学校并非传统的提供筛查、简短动机性咨询干预和转介治疗(SBIRT)的场所。这项转化研究旨在检验在两所纽约市的城区学校中开展 SBIRT 的可行性,并探讨其经济可持续性。2012 年春季,在非学术课程期间对 248 名学生进行了筛查:其中 42%(n=105)报告有物质使用(而在全校范围的匿名纸质调查中,这一比例为 28%)。除一名筛查阳性的学生外,其余学生均自愿接受了一次或多次简短干预,有两名学生被转介接受治疗。这种基于学校的 SBIRT 模式不会干扰学术活动,实施起来具有可行性,且受到学生、教师和管理人员的欢迎。这些数据清楚地表明,进一步进行有效性测试是合理且有价值的,然而,由于我们未能获得保险信息、授权和报销,因此无法支持这种模式的可持续性。