• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

社会经济地位与宫颈癌患者生存:丹麦 2005-2010 年确诊宫颈癌患者中癌症分期、合并症和吸烟的影响。

Socioeconomic position and survival after cervical cancer: influence of cancer stage, comorbidity and smoking among Danish women diagnosed between 2005 and 2010.

机构信息

Danish Cancer Society Research Center, Strandboulevarden 49, DK-2100 Copenhagen, Denmark.

出版信息

Br J Cancer. 2013 Oct 29;109(9):2489-95. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2013.558. Epub 2013 Sep 12.

DOI:10.1038/bjc.2013.558
PMID:24030072
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3817318/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

In an attempt to decrease social disparities in cancer survival, it is important to consider the mechanisms by which socioeconomic position influences cancer prognosis. We aimed to investigate whether any associations between socioeconomic factors and survival after cervical cancer could be explained by socioeconomic differences in cancer stage, comorbidity, lifestyle factors or treatment.

METHODS

We identified 1961 cases of cervical cancer diagnosed between 2005 and 2010 in the Danish Gynaecological Cancer database, with information on prognostic factors, treatment and lifestyle. Age, vital status, comorbidity and socioeconomic data were obtained from nationwide administrative registers. Associations between socioeconomic indicators (education, income and cohabitation status) and mortality by all causes were analysed in Cox regression models with inclusion of possible mediators. Median follow-up time was 3.0 years (0.01-7.0).

RESULTS

All cause mortality was higher in women with shorter rather than longer education (hazard ratio (HR), 1.46; 1.20-1.77), among those with lower rather than higher income (HR, 1.32; 1.07-1.63) and among women aged<60 years without a partner rather than those who cohabited (HR, 1.60; 1.29-1.98). Socioeconomic differences in survival were partly explained by cancer stage and less by comorbidity or smoking (stage- and comorbidity-adjusted HRs being 1.07; 0.96-1.19 for education and 1.15; 0.86-1.52 for income).

CONCLUSION

Socioeconomic disparities in survival after cervical cancer were partly explained by socioeconomic differences in cancer stage. The results point to the importance of further investigations into reducing diagnosis delay among disadvantaged groups.

摘要

背景

为了减少癌症生存方面的社会差异,考虑社会经济地位影响癌症预后的机制非常重要。我们旨在研究社会经济因素与宫颈癌生存之间的任何关联是否可以用癌症分期、合并症、生活方式因素或治疗方面的社会经济差异来解释。

方法

我们从丹麦妇科癌症数据库中确定了 1961 例 2005 年至 2010 年间诊断出的宫颈癌病例,这些病例有预后因素、治疗和生活方式方面的信息。年龄、生存状态、合并症和社会经济数据来自全国性行政登记册。在包含可能的中介因素的 Cox 回归模型中,分析了社会经济指标(教育、收入和同居状况)与所有原因死亡率之间的关系。中位随访时间为 3.0 年(0.01-7.0)。

结果

与教育程度较长的女性相比,教育程度较短的女性全因死亡率更高(风险比(HR),1.46;1.20-1.77),收入较低的女性全因死亡率更高(HR,1.32;1.07-1.63),年龄<60 岁且没有伴侣的女性全因死亡率更高(HR,1.60;1.29-1.98)。生存方面的社会经济差异部分可以用癌症分期来解释,而合并症或吸烟的解释程度较小(经癌症分期和合并症调整后的 HR 分别为 1.07;0.96-1.19 教育和 1.15;0.86-1.52 收入)。

结论

宫颈癌患者生存方面的社会经济差异部分可以用癌症分期的社会经济差异来解释。结果表明,进一步研究减少弱势群体的诊断延迟非常重要。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3d68/3817318/41724d3c717c/bjc2013558f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3d68/3817318/41724d3c717c/bjc2013558f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3d68/3817318/41724d3c717c/bjc2013558f1.jpg

相似文献

1
Socioeconomic position and survival after cervical cancer: influence of cancer stage, comorbidity and smoking among Danish women diagnosed between 2005 and 2010.社会经济地位与宫颈癌患者生存:丹麦 2005-2010 年确诊宫颈癌患者中癌症分期、合并症和吸烟的影响。
Br J Cancer. 2013 Oct 29;109(9):2489-95. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2013.558. Epub 2013 Sep 12.
2
Socioeconomic position and survival after lung cancer: Influence of stage, treatment and comorbidity among Danish patients with lung cancer diagnosed in 2004-2010.社会经济地位与肺癌患者生存率:2004 - 2010年丹麦肺癌确诊患者中分期、治疗及合并症的影响
Acta Oncol. 2015 May;54(5):797-804. doi: 10.3109/0284186X.2014.1001037. Epub 2015 Mar 12.
3
Socioeconomic position and stage of cervical cancer in Danish women diagnosed 2005 to 2009.丹麦女性 2005 年至 2009 年确诊的宫颈癌的社会经济地位和阶段。
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2012 May;21(5):835-42. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-11-1159. Epub 2012 Mar 20.
4
Do stage of disease, comorbidity or access to treatment explain socioeconomic differences in survival after ovarian cancer? - A cohort study among Danish women diagnosed 2005-2010.疾病分期、合并症或治疗可及性能否解释卵巢癌患者生存的社会经济差异?——一项针对2005年至2010年确诊的丹麦女性的队列研究。
Cancer Epidemiol. 2015 Jun;39(3):353-9. doi: 10.1016/j.canep.2015.03.011. Epub 2015 Apr 1.
5
Does stage of cancer, comorbidity or lifestyle factors explain educational differences in survival after endometrial cancer? A cohort study among Danish women diagnosed 2005-2009.癌症分期、合并症或生活方式因素能否解释子宫内膜癌患者生存情况的教育差异?一项针对2005 - 2009年确诊的丹麦女性的队列研究。
Acta Oncol. 2016 Jun;55(6):680-5. doi: 10.3109/0284186X.2015.1136750. Epub 2016 May 4.
6
Influence of metabolic indicators, smoking, alcohol and socioeconomic position on mortality after breast cancer.代谢指标、吸烟、饮酒及社会经济地位对乳腺癌患者死亡率的影响。
Acta Oncol. 2015 May;54(5):780-8. doi: 10.3109/0284186X.2014.998774. Epub 2015 Mar 11.
7
Socioeconomic position and stage at diagnosis of head and neck cancer - a nationwide study from DAHANCA.社会经济地位与头颈癌诊断分期——丹麦头颈癌组(DAHANCA)的一项全国性研究
Acta Oncol. 2015 May;54(5):759-66. doi: 10.3109/0284186X.2014.998279. Epub 2015 Mar 3.
8
Do patient characteristics, disease, or treatment explain social inequality in survival from colorectal cancer?患者特征、疾病或治疗能否解释结直肠癌生存方面的社会不平等现象?
Soc Sci Med. 2009 Oct;69(7):1107-15. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2009.07.040. Epub 2009 Aug 18.
9
Demographic differences in stage at diagnosis and cervical cancer survival in New Zealand, 1994-2005.新西兰 1994-2005 年宫颈癌诊断时的分期和生存的人口统计学差异。
J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2009 Jul;18(7):955-63. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2008.1163.
10
Influence of socioeconomic factors on survival after breast cancer--a nationwide cohort study of women diagnosed with breast cancer in Denmark 1983-1999.社会经济因素对乳腺癌患者生存的影响——一项针对1983年至1999年在丹麦被诊断为乳腺癌的女性的全国性队列研究。
Int J Cancer. 2007 Dec 1;121(11):2524-31. doi: 10.1002/ijc.22979.

引用本文的文献

1
Awareness of cervical cancer risk factors and preventive approaches, and perceived causes of cervical cancer among secondary school girls: a cross-sectional study in Northern Uganda.乌干达北部中学生对宫颈癌风险因素和预防方法的认知,以及对宫颈癌病因的认知:一项横断面研究。
Ann Med. 2024 Dec;56(1):2374860. doi: 10.1080/07853890.2024.2374860. Epub 2024 Jul 8.
2
Diagnostic and pre-treatment intervals among patients with cervical cancer attending care at the Uganda Cancer Institute: a cross-sectional study.在乌干达癌症研究所接受治疗的宫颈癌患者的诊断和治疗前间隔:一项横断面研究。
BMC Womens Health. 2023 Nov 27;23(1):633. doi: 10.1186/s12905-023-02785-3.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Neighborhood deprivation and risk of cervical cancer morbidity and mortality: a multilevel analysis from Sweden.社区剥夺与宫颈癌发病和死亡风险:来自瑞典的多层次分析。
Gynecol Oncol. 2012 Nov;127(2):283-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2012.07.103. Epub 2012 Jul 20.
2
Widening socioeconomic disparities in cervical cancer mortality among women in 26 states, 1993-2007.1993-2007 年,26 个州的女性宫颈癌死亡率中社会经济差异不断扩大。
Cancer. 2012 Oct 15;118(20):5110-6. doi: 10.1002/cncr.27606. Epub 2012 Jun 15.
3
What do British women know about cervical cancer symptoms and risk factors?
Establishment of prediction models to predict survival among patients with cervical cancer based on socioeconomic factors: a retrospective cohort study based on the SEER Database.
基于社会经济因素预测宫颈癌患者生存的预测模型的建立:基于 SEER 数据库的回顾性队列研究。
BMJ Open. 2023 Oct 12;13(10):e072556. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-072556.
4
Racial/Ethnic Disparities in Cervical Cancer Stage at Diagnosis: Mediating Effects of Neighborhood-level Socioeconomic Deprivation.种族/民族差异与宫颈癌诊断时的分期:邻里层面社会经济剥夺的中介作用。
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2023 Jun 1;32(6):818-824. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-23-0038.
5
Socioeconomic position and clinical outcomes in patients with myelodysplastic syndromes: A population-based cohort study.基于人群的队列研究:骨髓增生异常综合征患者的社会经济地位与临床结局。
Hematol Oncol. 2022 Dec;40(5):1056-1066. doi: 10.1002/hon.3068. Epub 2022 Sep 6.
6
Income-based disparities in the risk of distant-stage cervical cancer and 5-year mortality after the introduction of a National Cancer Screening Program in Korea.韩国国家癌症筛查计划实施后,基于收入的宫颈癌远处转移风险和 5 年死亡率的差异。
Epidemiol Health. 2022;44:e2022066. doi: 10.4178/epih.e2022066. Epub 2022 Aug 11.
7
Determinants of sexual function among survivors of gynaecological cancers in a tertiary hospital: a cross-sectional study.一家三级医院中妇科癌症幸存者性功能的决定因素:一项横断面研究。
Ecancermedicalscience. 2022 May 5;16:1384. doi: 10.3332/ecancer.2022.1384. eCollection 2022.
8
To what extent do age, stage and treatment influence survival after invasive cervical cancer: a French population-based study.年龄、分期和治疗在多大程度上影响浸润性宫颈癌患者的生存:一项基于人群的法国研究。
Cancer Causes Control. 2022 Mar;33(3):403-415. doi: 10.1007/s10552-021-01536-9. Epub 2022 Jan 26.
9
Factors influencing the occurrence of electrolyte disorders in cancer patients.影响癌症患者电解质紊乱发生的因素。
SAGE Open Med. 2021 Oct 20;9:20503121211052861. doi: 10.1177/20503121211052861. eCollection 2021.
10
Factors Explaining Socio-Economic Inequalities in Cancer Survival: A Systematic Review.解释癌症生存的社会经济不平等因素:系统评价。
Cancer Control. 2021 Jan-Dec;28:10732748211011956. doi: 10.1177/10732748211011956.
英国女性对宫颈癌症状和风险因素了解多少?
Eur J Cancer. 2012 Nov;48(16):3001-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2012.05.004. Epub 2012 Jun 7.
4
Socioeconomic position and stage of cervical cancer in Danish women diagnosed 2005 to 2009.丹麦女性 2005 年至 2009 年确诊的宫颈癌的社会经济地位和阶段。
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2012 May;21(5):835-42. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-11-1159. Epub 2012 Mar 20.
5
Danish registers on personal income and transfer payments.丹麦个人收入和转移支付登记册。
Scand J Public Health. 2011 Jul;39(7 Suppl):103-5. doi: 10.1177/1403494811405098.
6
Danish Education Registers.丹麦教育登记册。
Scand J Public Health. 2011 Jul;39(7 Suppl):91-4. doi: 10.1177/1403494810394715.
7
The Danish Pathology Register.丹麦病理学登记处。
Scand J Public Health. 2011 Jul;39(7 Suppl):72-4. doi: 10.1177/1403494810393563.
8
The Danish National Patient Register.丹麦国家患者登记处。
Scand J Public Health. 2011 Jul;39(7 Suppl):30-3. doi: 10.1177/1403494811401482.
9
The Danish Civil Registration System.丹麦民事登记系统。
Scand J Public Health. 2011 Jul;39(7 Suppl):22-5. doi: 10.1177/1403494810387965.
10
Direct and indirect effects in a survival context.在生存环境中直接和间接的影响。
Epidemiology. 2011 Jul;22(4):575-81. doi: 10.1097/EDE.0b013e31821c680c.