Division of Noninvasive Cardiology, San Raffaele Hospital, IRCCS, Via Olgettina 60, 20132, Milan, Italy.
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2014 Jan;30(1):31-8. doi: 10.1007/s10554-013-0290-y. Epub 2013 Sep 13.
The aim of this study is to evaluate the role of contrast transesophageal echocardiography (cTEE) in the diagnostic characterization of acute aortic syndromes (AAS) [aortic dissection, intramural hematoma, penetrating ulcer]. We enrolled 66 non-consecutive patients with clinical suspicion of AAS. Standard transesophageal echocardiography and cTEE were performed prior to gated-CT angiography, which has been assumed as reference standard. cTEE was obtained with a single bolus of contrast agent injection. The definitive diagnosis of AAS was made in 48 patients by gated-CT angiography: 22 aortic dissections, 15 intramural hematomas and 11 penetrating aortic ulcers. Standard TEE and cTEE correctly diagnosed AAS in 87 and 100% (P = 0.03) cases respectively. Standard TEE correctly diagnosed aortic dissection in 20/22 (91%) and cTEE in 22/22 (100 %) (P = 0.5) cases. cTEE was superior than standard TEE in the visualization of false lumen entry tear (22/22 vs. 16/22, P = 0.03). Standard TEE correctly diagnosed intramural hematoma in 11/15 and cTEE 15/15 (P = 0.12) cases. Microtears were identified in 3 patients by cTEE an in 1 patient by standard TEE (P = 0.4). The presence of focal contrast enhancement was identified in 4 and 0 patients by cTEE and standard TEE respectively (P = 0.06). Both standard and cTEE correctly diagnosed penetrating aortic ulcer in 11/11 (100%) (P = 1.0) cases. cTEE provides additional value over standard TEE in the diagnosis and in the anatomic and functional characterization of AAS.
本研究旨在评估对比经食管超声心动图(cTEE)在急性主动脉综合征(AAS)[主动脉夹层、壁内血肿、穿透性溃疡]的诊断特征中的作用。我们纳入了 66 例临床疑似 AAS 的非连续患者。在门控 CT 血管造影前进行了标准经食管超声心动图和 cTEE 检查,后者被认为是参考标准。cTEE 通过单次对比剂注射获得。通过门控 CT 血管造影在 48 例患者中确诊 AAS:22 例主动脉夹层、15 例壁内血肿和 11 例穿透性主动脉溃疡。标准 TEE 和 cTEE 分别正确诊断 AAS 87%和 100%(P = 0.03)的病例。标准 TEE 正确诊断 22/22(91%)例主动脉夹层,cTEE 正确诊断 22/22(100%)例主动脉夹层(P = 0.5)。cTEE 在显示假腔入口撕裂方面优于标准 TEE(22/22 与 16/22,P = 0.03)。标准 TEE 正确诊断 11/15 例壁内血肿,cTEE 正确诊断 15/15 例(P = 0.12)。cTEE 在 3 例患者中发现微小撕裂,标准 TEE 在 1 例患者中发现微小撕裂(P = 0.4)。cTEE 在 4 例患者中发现局灶性对比增强,标准 TEE 在 0 例患者中发现局灶性对比增强(P = 0.06)。标准 TEE 和 cTEE 均正确诊断 11/11(100%)例穿透性主动脉溃疡(P = 1.0)。cTEE 在 AAS 的诊断以及解剖和功能特征方面提供了比标准 TEE 更高的价值。