Emilia-Romagna Regional Agency for Health and Social Care, Viale Aldo Moro 21, 40127 Bologna, Italy.
BMJ. 2013 Sep 12;347:f5391. doi: 10.1136/bmj.f5391.
To test the hypothesis that a multifaceted, local public campaign could be feasible and influence antibiotic prescribing for outpatients.
Community level, controlled, non-randomised trial.
Provinces of Modena and Parma in Emilia-Romagna, northern Italy, November 2011 to February 2012.
1,150,000 residents of Modena and Parma (intervention group) and 3,250,000 residents in provinces in the same region but where no campaign had been implemented (control group).
Campaign materials (mainly posters, brochures, and advertisements on local media, plus a newsletter on local antibiotic resistance targeted at doctors and pharmacists). General practitioners and paediatricians in the intervention area participated in designing the campaign messages.
Primary outcome was the average change in prescribing rates of antibiotics for outpatient in five months, measured as defined daily doses per 1000 inhabitants/day, using health districts as the unit of analysis.
Antibiotic prescribing was reduced in the intervention area compared with control area (-4.3%, 95% confidence interval -7.1% to -1.5%). This result was robust to "sensitivity analysis" modifying the baseline period from two months (main analysis) to one month. A higher decrease was observed for penicillins resistant to β lactamase and a lower decrease for penicillins susceptible to β lactamase, consistent with the content of the newsletter on antibiotic resistance directed at health professionals. The decrease in expenditure on antibiotics was not statistically significant in a district level analysis with a two month baseline period (main analysis), but was statistically significant in sensitivity analyses using either a one month baseline period or a more powered doctor level analysis. Knowledge and attitudes of the target population about the correct use of antibiotics did not differ between the intervention and control areas.
A local low cost information campaign targeted at citizens, combined with a newsletter on local antibiotic resistance targeted at doctors and pharmacists, was associated with significantly decreased total rates of antibiotic prescribing but did not affect the population's knowledge and attitudes about antibiotic resistance.
ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01604096.
检验假设,即多方面的、地方性的公众宣传活动是否可行,并对门诊患者的抗生素处方产生影响。
社区层面、对照、非随机试验。
意大利艾米利亚-罗马涅大区摩德纳和帕尔马省,2011 年 11 月至 2012 年 2 月。
摩德纳和帕尔马省的 115 万居民(干预组)和同一地区的 325 万居民(对照组,未实施宣传活动)。
宣传材料(主要是海报、宣传册和当地媒体广告,以及一份针对医生和药剂师的当地抗生素耐药性通讯)。干预地区的全科医生和儿科医生参与设计了宣传信息。
主要结局是五个月内门诊抗生素处方率的平均变化,以每 1000 居民/天的定义日剂量(DDD)衡量,以卫生区为分析单位。
与对照组相比,干预组的抗生素处方减少(-4.3%,95%置信区间为-7.1%至-1.5%)。该结果在将基线期从两个月(主要分析)修改为一个月的“敏感性分析”中是稳健的。对β内酰胺酶耐药的青霉素类药物的下降幅度较大,对β内酰胺酶敏感的青霉素类药物的下降幅度较小,与针对卫生专业人员的抗生素耐药通讯中的内容一致。在使用两个月基线期的地区水平分析中,抗生素支出的减少在统计学上并不显著(主要分析),但在使用一个月基线期或更有力的医生水平分析的敏感性分析中是显著的。在干预组和对照组之间,目标人群对抗生素正确使用的知识和态度没有差异。
针对市民的地方性、低成本的信息宣传活动,结合针对医生和药剂师的当地抗生素耐药性通讯,与抗生素总处方率的显著下降相关,但并未影响人群对抗生素耐药性的知识和态度。
ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01604096。