Suttels Véronique, Van Singer Mathias, Clack Lauren Catherine, Plüss-Suard Catherine, Niquille Anne, Mueller Yolanda, Boillat Blanco Noémie
Infectious Diseases Service, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne, 1011 Lausanne, Switzerland.
Institute for Implementation Science in Health Care, Medical Faculty, University of Zurich, 8006 Zürich, Switzerland.
Antibiotics (Basel). 2022 Dec 24;12(1):30. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics12010030.
Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is directly driven by inappropriate use of antibiotics. Although the majority of antibiotics (an estimated 80%) are consumed in primary care settings, antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) activities in primary care remain underdeveloped and factors influencing their implementation are poorly understood. This can result in promising stewardship activities having little-to-no real-world impact. With this narrative review, we aim to identify and summarize peer-reviewed literature reporting on (1) the nature and impact of AMS interventions in primary care and (2) the individual and contextual factors influencing their implementation. Reported activities included AMS at different contextual levels (individual, collective and policy). AMS activities being often combined, it is difficult to evaluate them as stand-alone interventions. While some important individual and contextual factors were reported (difficulty to reach physicians leading to a low uptake of interventions, tight workflow of physicians requiring implementation of flexible and brief interventions and AMS as a unique opportunity to strengthen physician-patients relationship), this review identified a paucity of information in the literature about the factors that support or hinder implementation of AMS in primary care settings. In conclusion, identifying multilevel barriers and facilitators for AMS uptake is an essential step to explore before implementing primary care AMS interventions.
抗菌药物耐药性(AMR)直接由抗生素的不当使用所致。尽管大多数抗生素(估计80%)在初级保健机构中使用,但初级保健中的抗菌药物管理(AMS)活动仍不发达,且对影响其实施的因素了解甚少。这可能导致有前景的管理活动几乎没有实际影响。通过本叙述性综述,我们旨在识别和总结同行评议文献中关于(1)初级保健中AMS干预措施的性质和影响,以及(2)影响其实施的个体和背景因素的报道。报告的活动包括不同背景层面(个体、集体和政策层面)的AMS。由于AMS活动常常相互结合,难以将其作为独立干预措施进行评估。虽然报告了一些重要的个体和背景因素(难以接触到医生导致干预措施的接受度低、医生工作流程紧张需要实施灵活且简短的干预措施,以及AMS是加强医患关系的独特机会),但本综述发现文献中关于支持或阻碍初级保健机构中AMS实施的因素的信息匮乏。总之,在实施初级保健AMS干预措施之前,识别AMS采用的多层次障碍和促进因素是必须探索的重要一步。