Yager J Y, Johnston B, Seshia S S
Section of Pediatric Neurosciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Canada.
Am J Dis Child. 1990 Oct;144(10):1088-91. doi: 10.1001/archpedi.1990.02150340032019.
Interobserver variability for six coma scales was assessed prospectively on a sample of 15 comatose children, by two physicians, in a double-blind fashion. The six scales were the Glasgow Coma Scale, the Simpson and Reilly Scale, the Children's Coma Score, the Children's Orthopedic Hospital and Medical Center Scale, the Jacobi Scale, and the 0 to IV Scale. Interobserver variability was measured by using disagreement rate and the kappa statistic. The results from both methods were generally concordant. The disagreement rate for the various items in the different scales ranged from a high of 0.20 to a low of 0.03. The disagreement rate was greater than 0.10 for verbal responses in the Children's Coma Score and Glasgow Coma Scale and for both items in the Children's Orthopedic Hospital and Medical Center Scale. The disagreement rate was 0.10 or less for the 0 to IV Scale and for all items in the Simpson and Reilly and Jacobi scales. The relatively high interobserver agreement for these scales makes them more suitable for the pediatric setting than the other three scales, since good agreement is essential for interpreting data reliably, both in clinical practice and for research.
两名医生以双盲方式对15名昏迷儿童样本前瞻性地评估了六种昏迷量表的观察者间变异性。这六种量表分别是格拉斯哥昏迷量表、辛普森和赖利量表、儿童昏迷评分、儿童骨科医院和医疗中心量表、雅可比量表以及0至IV级量表。通过使用分歧率和kappa统计量来测量观察者间变异性。两种方法的结果总体上是一致的。不同量表中各个项目的分歧率从高的0.20到低的0.03不等。儿童昏迷评分和格拉斯哥昏迷量表中言语反应的分歧率以及儿童骨科医院和医疗中心量表中两个项目的分歧率均大于0.10。0至IV级量表以及辛普森和赖利量表与雅可比量表中所有项目的分歧率为0.10或更低。这些量表相对较高的观察者间一致性使得它们比其他三种量表更适用于儿科环境,因为无论是在临床实践还是研究中,良好的一致性对于可靠地解释数据至关重要。