Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA.
Department of Neurology, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA.
Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2019 Jul;20(7):660-666. doi: 10.1097/PCC.0000000000001938.
Estimate the inter-rater reliability of critical care nurses performing a pediatric modification of the Glasgow Coma Scale in a contemporary PICU.
Prospective observation study.
Large academic PICU.
PATIENTS/SUBJECTS: All 274 nurses with permanent assignments in the PICU were eligible to participate. A subset of 18 nurses were selected as study registered nurses. All PICU patients were eligible to participate.
None.
PICU nurses were educated and demonstrated proficiency on a pediatric modification of the Glasgow Coma Scale we created to make it more applicable to a diverse PICU population that included patients who are sedated, mechanically ventilated, and/or have developmental disabilities. Each study registered nurse observed a sample of nurses perform the Glasgow Coma Scale, and they independently scored the Glasgow Coma Scale. Patients were categorized as having developmental disabilities if their preillness Pediatric Cerebral Performance Category score was greater than or equal to 3. Fleiss' Kappa (κ), intraclass correlation coefficient, and percent agreement assessed inter-rater reliability for each Glasgow Coma Scale component (eye, verbal, motor) and age-specific scale (≥ 2 and < 2-yr-old). The overall percent agreement between study registered nurses and nurses was 89% for the eye, 91% for the verbal, and 79% for the motor responses. Inter-rater reliability ranged from good (intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.75) to excellent (intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.96) for testable patients. Agreement on the motor response was significantly lower for children with developmental disabilities (< 2 yr: 59% vs 95%; p = 0.0012 and ≥ 2 yr: 55% vs 91%; p = 0.0012). Agreement was significantly worse for intermediate range Glasgow Coma Scale motor responses compared with responses at the extremes (e.g., motor responses 2, 3, 4 vs 1, 5, 6; p < 0.05).
A pediatric modification of the Glasgow Coma Scale performed by trained PICU nurses has excellent inter-rater reliability, although reliability was reduced in patients with developmental disabilities and for intermediate range Glasgow Coma Scale responses. Further research is needed to determine the effectiveness of this Glasgow Coma Scale modification to detect clinical deterioration.
评估在当代儿科重症监护病房(PICU)中进行小儿改良格拉斯哥昏迷量表(GCS)评估的重症监护护士的组内可靠性。
前瞻性观察研究。
大型学术性 PICU。
患者/受试者:所有具有 PICU 永久分配的 274 名护士均有资格参加。选择了 18 名护士作为研究注册护士。所有 PICU 患者均有资格参加。
无。
对我们创建的小儿改良 GCS 进行了教育和演示,使其更适用于包括镇静、机械通气和/或发育障碍的患者在内的多样化 PICU 人群,从而对 PICU 护士进行了教育。每位研究注册护士观察了一组护士进行 GCS 评估,他们独立对 GCS 进行了评分。如果患者发病前的小儿脑功能分类评分≥3,则将其归类为发育障碍。Fleiss' Kappa(κ)、组内相关系数和百分比一致率评估了每个 GCS 分量(眼、语言、运动)和年龄特异性量表(≥2 岁和<2 岁)的组内可靠性。研究注册护士和护士之间的总体眼、语言和运动反应百分比一致率分别为 89%、91%和 79%。对于可测试的患者,组内可靠性范围从良好(组内相关系数=0.75)到优秀(组内相关系数=0.96)。对于发育障碍的儿童,运动反应的一致性明显较低(<2 岁:59%与 95%;p=0.0012 和≥2 岁:55%与 91%;p=0.0012)。与极端反应(例如,运动反应 2、3、4 与 1、5、6)相比,中间范围 GCS 运动反应的一致性明显更差(p<0.05)。
经过培训的 PICU 护士进行的小儿改良 GCS 具有出色的组内可靠性,尽管在发育障碍患者和中间范围 GCS 反应中可靠性降低。需要进一步研究以确定这种 GCS 改良是否可用于检测临床恶化。