Musholt Kristina
Department of Philosophy, Logic and Scientific Method, London School of Economics and Political Science , London , UK.
Front Hum Neurosci. 2013 Sep 2;7:536. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2013.00536.
In recent years there has been increasing evidence that an area in the brain called the cortical midline structures (CMSs) is implicated in what has been termed self-related processing. This article will discuss recent evidence for the relation between CMS and self-consciousness in light of several important philosophical distinctions. First, we should distinguish between being a self (i.e., being a subject of conscious experience) and being aware of being a self (i.e., being able to think about oneself as such). While the former consists in having a first-person perspective on the world, the latter requires the ability to explicitly represent one's own perspective as such. Further, we should distinguish between being aware of oneself "as subject" and being aware of oneself "as object." The focus of existing studies investigating the relation between CMS and self has been predominantly on the ability to think about oneself (and in particular thinking of oneself "as object"), while the more basic aspects involved in being a self have been neglected. However, it is important to widen the scope of the cognitive neuroscience to include the latter, not least because this might have important implications for a better understanding of disorders of the self, such as those involved in schizophrenia. In order to do so, cognitive neuroscience should work together with philosophy, including phenomenology. Second, we need to distinguish between personal and subpersonal level explanations. It will be argued that although it is important to respect this distinction, in principle, some subpersonal facts can enter into constitutive conditions of personal-level phenomena. However, in order for this to be possible, one needs both careful conceptual analysis and knowledge about relevant cognitive mechanisms.
近年来,越来越多的证据表明,大脑中一个被称为皮质中线结构(CMSs)的区域与所谓的自我相关加工有关。本文将根据几个重要的哲学区分,讨论CMS与自我意识之间关系的最新证据。首先,我们应该区分作为一个自我(即作为有意识体验的主体)和意识到自己是一个自我(即能够将自己视为这样的个体进行思考)。前者在于对世界有第一人称视角,而后者需要能够明确地将自己的视角表征为这样。此外,我们应该区分“作为主体”意识到自己和“作为客体”意识到自己。现有研究调查CMS与自我之间关系的重点主要在于思考自己的能力(特别是将自己“视为客体”进行思考),而作为一个自我所涉及的更基本方面则被忽视了。然而,扩大认知神经科学的范围以包括后者很重要,尤其是因为这可能对更好地理解自我障碍(如精神分裂症所涉及的那些障碍)有重要意义。为了做到这一点,认知神经科学应该与哲学(包括现象学)合作。其次,我们需要区分个人层面和亚个人层面的解释。将论证,虽然尊重这种区分很重要,但原则上,一些亚个人事实可以进入个人层面现象的构成条件。然而,为了使其成为可能,需要仔细的概念分析和关于相关认知机制的知识。