• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

射频消融治疗老年肝细胞癌的疗效及长期预后。

Efficacy and long-term outcomes of radiofrequency ablation in the elderly with hepatocellular carcinoma.

机构信息

Center for Gastroenterology, Teine Keijinkai Hospital, Sapporo, Japan.

出版信息

Hepatol Res. 2014 Oct;44(11):1095-101. doi: 10.1111/hepr.12233. Epub 2013 Oct 25.

DOI:10.1111/hepr.12233
PMID:24033930
Abstract

AIM

The use of radiofrequency ablation (RFA) in elderly patients is increasing in those with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). This study compares the elderly (≥75 years old) to non-elderly patients (<75 years old) in the outcomes of the efficacy and safety of RFA.

METHODS

Three hundred and thirty-five patients, 103 elderly and 232 non-elderly, with naive HCC who were treated with RFA from 1999 to 2012 were enrolled. Patient characteristics, complications, length of hospital stay, overall survival (OS), median survival time (MST), recurrence-free survival (RFS) and factors related to OS were analyzed.

RESULTS

Median age was 79 years (range, 75-88) in the elderly group and 65 years (38-74) in the non-elderly group. The proportion of women (45.6% and 28.0%), hepatitis C virus infection (63.1% and 50.4%) and comorbidities (78.6% and 44.0%) in the elderly group compared to the non-elderly group, respectively, was significantly higher. No difference existed in the complications and length of hospital stay. The 5-year OS rates and MST were 67.3% and 90.5 months in the elderly group and 60.9% and 86.4 months in the non-elderly group, respectively (P = 0.486). The median RFS time was 20 months in the elderly group and 18.7 months in the non-elderly group (P = 0.429). In multivariate analysis, the Child-Pugh grade and tumor-node-metastasis stage were significantly associated with OS (P < 0.001, =0.003); age was not (P = 0.355).

CONCLUSION

RFA in elderly patients is as effective and safe as in non-elderly patients for the treatment of HCC.

摘要

目的

射频消融术(RFA)在老年肝细胞癌(HCC)患者中的应用正在增加。本研究比较了 RFA 疗效和安全性方面老年(≥75 岁)与非老年(<75 岁)患者的结果。

方法

纳入了 1999 年至 2012 年期间接受 RFA 治疗的 335 例初治 HCC 患者,其中 103 例为老年患者,232 例为非老年患者。分析了患者特征、并发症、住院时间、总生存期(OS)、中位生存期(MST)、无复发生存期(RFS)以及与 OS 相关的因素。

结果

老年组患者的中位年龄为 79 岁(范围为 75-88 岁),非老年组为 65 岁(38-74 岁)。与非老年组相比,老年组女性(45.6%比 28.0%)、丙型肝炎病毒感染(63.1%比 50.4%)和合并症(78.6%比 44.0%)的比例更高。两组间并发症和住院时间无差异。老年组 5 年 OS 率和 MST 分别为 67.3%和 90.5 个月,非老年组分别为 60.9%和 86.4 个月(P=0.486)。老年组的中位 RFS 时间为 20 个月,非老年组为 18.7 个月(P=0.429)。多因素分析显示,Child-Pugh 分级和肿瘤-淋巴结-转移分期与 OS 显著相关(P<0.001,P=0.003);年龄无相关性(P=0.355)。

结论

RFA 治疗 HCC 时,老年患者与非老年患者一样有效且安全。

相似文献

1
Efficacy and long-term outcomes of radiofrequency ablation in the elderly with hepatocellular carcinoma.射频消融治疗老年肝细胞癌的疗效及长期预后。
Hepatol Res. 2014 Oct;44(11):1095-101. doi: 10.1111/hepr.12233. Epub 2013 Oct 25.
2
Efficacy and safety of radiofrequency ablation for elderly hepatocellular carcinoma patients.射频消融治疗老年肝细胞癌患者的疗效和安全性。
Hepatol Res. 2010 Oct;40(10):997-1005. doi: 10.1111/j.1872-034X.2010.00713.x.
3
Combined radiofrequency ablation and ethanol injection versus repeat hepatectomy for elderly patients with recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma after initial hepatic surgery.射频消融联合乙醇注射与再次肝切除术治疗初次肝切除术后老年复发性肝细胞癌患者。
Int J Hyperthermia. 2018 Nov;34(7):1029-1037. doi: 10.1080/02656736.2017.1387941. Epub 2017 Nov 16.
4
Radiofrequency ablation therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma in elderly patients.射频消融治疗老年肝细胞癌。
J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2010 Feb;25(2):403-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1746.2009.06037.x. Epub 2009 Nov 19.
5
The effect of long-term supplementation with branched-chain amino acid granules in patients with hepatitis C virus-related hepatocellular carcinoma after radiofrequency thermal ablation.长期补充支链氨基酸颗粒对丙型肝炎病毒相关肝细胞癌患者射频热消融治疗后的影响。
J Clin Gastroenterol. 2013 Apr;47(4):359-66. doi: 10.1097/MCG.0b013e31826be9ad.
6
Albumin-bilirubin grade may determine the outcomes of patients with very early stage hepatocellular carcinoma after radiofrequency ablation therapy.白蛋白-胆红素分级可能决定射频消融治疗后极早期肝细胞癌患者的结局。
J Chin Med Assoc. 2019 Jan;82(1):2-10. doi: 10.1097/JCMA.0000000000000001.
7
Percutaneous radiofrequency ablation for hepatocellular carcinoma: clinical outcome and safety in elderly patients.经皮射频消融治疗肝细胞癌:老年患者的临床疗效和安全性。
J Gastrointestin Liver Dis. 2012 Dec;21(4):397-405.
8
Radiofrequency ablation versus surgical resection of hepatocellular carcinoma: contemporary treatment trends and outcomes from the United States National Cancer Database.射频消融与手术切除治疗肝细胞癌:来自美国国家癌症数据库的当代治疗趋势和结果。
Eur Radiol. 2019 May;29(5):2679-2689. doi: 10.1007/s00330-018-5902-4. Epub 2018 Dec 17.
9
The risk factors for long-term survival outcome in solitary hepatocellular carcinoma up to 2 cm: Propensity score matching analysis in a population cohort with a high rate of HBV infection.2cm 以内单发肝细胞癌长期生存预后的危险因素:高乙肝病毒感染率人群队列的倾向评分匹配分析。
Int J Surg. 2019 Dec;72:1-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2019.10.006. Epub 2019 Oct 11.
10
Proton Beam Therapy versus Radiofrequency Ablation for Patients with Treatment-Naïve Single Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Propensity Score Analysis.初治单发肝细胞癌患者的质子束治疗与射频消融:一项倾向评分分析
Liver Cancer. 2022 Dec 6;12(4):297-308. doi: 10.1159/000528537. eCollection 2023 Sep.

引用本文的文献

1
Radiofrequency ablation versus surgical resection for small unifocal hepatocellular carcinomas.小的单灶性肝细胞癌的射频消融与手术切除对比
Medicine (Baltimore). 2014 Dec;93(29):e271. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000000271.
2
A case of small hepatocellular carcinoma treated with laparoscopic multipolar radiofrequency ablation with a no-touch ablation procedure.1例采用腹腔镜多极射频消融非接触式消融术治疗的小肝细胞癌病例。
Clin J Gastroenterol. 2014 Dec;7(6):510-5. doi: 10.1007/s12328-014-0531-1. Epub 2014 Oct 9.