Suppr超能文献

伴有和不伴有内侧半月板撕裂的前交叉韧带撕裂患者的姿势稳定性。

Postural stability in patients with anterior cruciate ligament tears with and without medial meniscus tears.

作者信息

Park Jong-Hoon, Jeong Woong-Kyo, Lee Jin-Hyuck, Cho Jae-Jin, Lee Dae-Hee

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Korea University Anam Hospital, Korea University College of Medicine, Anam-dong 5-ga, Seongbuk-gu, Seoul, 136-705, Korea.

出版信息

Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2015 Jan;23(1):240-5. doi: 10.1007/s00167-013-2675-9. Epub 2013 Sep 14.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To compare postural stability in patients with isolated anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) tears and ACL tears with associated meniscal tears.

METHODS

Quadriceps and hamstring muscle strength and their ratio, as well as the relationships of these parameters with postural stability, were compared in 23 patients with isolated ACL tears and 27 with combined ACL and medial meniscus tears. Postural stability was determined from the anterior-posterior, medial-lateral, and overall stability indices using the Biodex Stability System.

RESULTS

On both the involved and uninvolved sides, there were no differences in mean stability indices, including anterior-posterior, medial-lateral, and overall stability indices, in patients with isolated and combined ACL tears. In patients with isolated ACL tears, both overall (2.3 ± 1.2 vs. 1.8 ± 1.4, p = 0.033) and medial-lateral (1.2 ± 0.6 vs. 1.0 ± 0.5, p = 0.031) stability indices were significantly higher on the involved compared to the uninvolved side. These differences, however, were not observed in the combined ACL tear group.

CONCLUSION

No significant differences in postural instability on the affected and unaffected sides were observed in patients with isolated ACL tears and those with combined ACL and medial meniscus tears. These findings indicate that there is no need to reduce the goal of restoring proprioception in patients with combined compared with isolated ACL tears.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

摘要

目的

比较单纯前交叉韧带(ACL)撕裂患者与合并半月板撕裂的ACL撕裂患者的姿势稳定性。

方法

比较23例单纯ACL撕裂患者和27例合并ACL和内侧半月板撕裂患者的股四头肌和腘绳肌力量及其比值,以及这些参数与姿势稳定性的关系。使用Biodex稳定性系统从前-后、内-外和整体稳定性指数来确定姿势稳定性。

结果

在单纯ACL撕裂和合并ACL撕裂的患者中,患侧和健侧的平均稳定性指数,包括前-后、内-外和整体稳定性指数,均无差异。在单纯ACL撕裂患者中,患侧的整体(2.3±1.2对1.8±1.4,p=0.033)和内-外(1.2±0.6对1.0±0.5,p=0.031)稳定性指数均显著高于健侧。然而,在合并ACL撕裂组中未观察到这些差异。

结论

单纯ACL撕裂患者和合并ACL和内侧半月板撕裂患者在患侧和未患侧的姿势不稳定方面无显著差异。这些发现表明,与单纯ACL撕裂患者相比,合并ACL撕裂的患者无需降低恢复本体感觉的目标。

证据水平

III级。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验