Ministry of Health, P.O. Box 7272, Kampala, Uganda.
Int Health. 2010 Sep;2(3):197-205. doi: 10.1016/j.inhe.2010.07.009.
Despite growing interest at national and international levels to use community-directed interventions (CDI) for delivery of health interventions in Africa, inadequate information on its acceptability and effectiveness remains. This study aimed to examine community perceptions on CDI strategy and its effectiveness for integrated delivery of health interventions with different degrees of complexity (insecticide treated nets, vitamin A supplements to children, home management of malaria and direct observation treatment of tuberculosis), using community-directed treatment with ivermectin (CDTI) as an entry point, compared to conventional delivery channels. The interventions were implemented in an incremental manner and both qualitative and quantitative methods were used at evaluation, three years after implementation. Coverage was significantly higher in CDI arm, compared to conventional delivery channels for all interventions (P < 0.05), except for direct observation treatment of tuberculosis (P > 0.05). Community members expressed interest in CDI because it responds to their perceived health problems, actively engages them and improves access to health care services. CDI seemed to be appropriate for interventions that are relatively simple, intervention materials are available, the disease is perceived as a health problem affecting all sections of the community and can be easily integrated into their daily lives, and community structures with full community participation.
尽管在国家和国际层面上越来越关注使用社区定向干预(CDI)来在非洲提供卫生干预措施,但关于其可接受性和有效性的信息仍然不足。本研究旨在探讨社区对 CDI 策略的看法及其在提供不同复杂程度的卫生干预措施方面的有效性(经杀虫剂处理的蚊帐、儿童维生素 A 补充剂、疟疾家庭管理和直接观察治疗结核病),以社区定向治疗伊维菌素(CDTI)为切入点,与传统的提供渠道进行比较。这些干预措施是逐步实施的,在实施三年后,采用定性和定量方法进行评估。与传统的提供渠道相比,CDI 组在所有干预措施方面的覆盖率都显著更高(P < 0.05),除了直接观察治疗结核病(P > 0.05)。社区成员对 CDI 感兴趣,因为它针对他们认为的健康问题,积极地让他们参与其中,并改善了获得医疗服务的机会。CDI 似乎适用于相对简单的干预措施,干预材料可用,社区各阶层都认为该疾病是一个影响健康的问题,可以很容易地融入他们的日常生活,以及具有充分社区参与的社区结构。