Faculty of Life Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom.
PLoS One. 2013 Sep 11;8(9):e73150. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0073150. eCollection 2013.
Insects preserved in copal, the sub-fossilized resin precursor of amber, have potential value in molecular ecological studies of recently-extinct species and of extant species that have never been collected as living specimens. The objective of the work reported in this paper was therefore to determine if ancient DNA is present in insects preserved in copal. We prepared DNA libraries from two stingless bees (Apidae: Meliponini: Trigonisca ameliae) preserved in 'Anthropocene' Colombian copal, dated to 'post-Bomb' and 10,612±62 cal yr BP, respectively, and obtained sequence reads using the GS Junior 454 System. Read numbers were low, but were significantly higher for DNA extracts prepared from crushed insects compared with extracts obtained by a non-destructive method. The younger specimen yielded sequence reads up to 535 nucleotides in length, but searches of these sequences against the nucleotide database revealed very few significant matches. None of these hits was to stingless bees though one read of 97 nucleotides aligned with two non-contiguous segments of the mitochondrial cytochrome oxidase subunit I gene of the East Asia bumblebee Bombus hypocrita. The most significant hit was for 452 nucleotides of a 470-nucleotide read that aligned with part of the genome of the root-nodulating bacterium Bradyrhizobium japonicum. The other significant hits were to proteobacteria and an actinomycete. Searches directed specifically at Apidae nucleotide sequences only gave short and insignificant alignments. All of the reads from the older specimen appeared to be artefacts. We were therefore unable to obtain any convincing evidence for the preservation of ancient DNA in either of the two copal inclusions that we studied, and conclude that DNA is not preserved in this type of material. Our results raise further doubts about claims of DNA extraction from fossil insects in amber, many millions of years older than copal.
保存在柯巴脂(琥珀的亚化石树脂前体)中的昆虫对于最近灭绝物种和从未作为活体标本采集过的现存物种的分子生态学研究具有潜在价值。因此,本报告工作的目的是确定保存在柯巴脂中的昆虫是否存在古 DNA。我们从两个保存在“全新世”哥伦比亚柯巴脂中的无刺蜂(Apidae: Meliponini: Trigonisca ameliae)中制备了 DNA 文库,这两个标本的年代分别为“爆炸后”和 10612±62 年 cal BP。我们使用 GS Junior 454 系统获得了序列读数。读数数量很低,但与非破坏性方法获得的提取物相比,从粉碎的昆虫中获得的 DNA 提取物的读数要高得多。较年轻的标本产生了长达 535 个核苷酸的序列读数,但对这些序列与核苷酸数据库的搜索显示,很少有显著匹配。虽然有一个 97 个核苷酸的读取与东亚大黄蜂 Bombus hypocrita 的线粒体细胞色素氧化酶亚基 I 基因的两个不连续片段对齐,但没有一个与无刺蜂对齐。最显著的匹配是 452 个核苷酸的读取,与根瘤菌 Bradyrhizobium japonicum 的基因组的一部分对齐。其他显著的匹配是变形菌和放线菌。专门针对 Apidae 核苷酸序列的搜索仅给出了短的和不显著的对齐。较老标本的所有读数似乎都是人为产物。因此,我们无法为我们研究的两个柯巴脂夹杂物中的任何一个提供古 DNA 保存的令人信服的证据,并得出结论,这种类型的物质中不存在 DNA 保存。我们的结果进一步质疑了从琥珀中提取化石昆虫 DNA 的说法,琥珀的年代比柯巴脂要早数百万年。