Department of Cognitive Neuroscience, Faculty of Psychology and Neuroscience, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands ; Maastricht Brain Imaging Center, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
PLoS One. 2013 Sep 5;8(9):e73813. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0073813. eCollection 2013.
Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) is widely used in experimental brain research to manipulate brain activity in humans. Next to the intended neural effects, every TMS pulse produces a distinct clicking sound and sensation on the head which can also influence task performance. This necessitates careful consideration of control conditions in order to ensure that behavioral effects of interest can be attributed to the neural consequences of TMS and not to non-neural effects of a TMS pulse. Surprisingly, even though these non-neural effects of TMS are largely unknown, they are often assumed to be unspecific, i.e. not dependent on TMS parameters. This assumption is inherent to many control strategies in TMS research but has recently been challenged on empirical grounds. Here, we further develop the empirical basis of control strategies in TMS research. We investigated the time-dependence and task-dependence of the non-neural effects of TMS and compared real and sham TMS over vertex. Critically, we show that non-neural TMS effects depend on a complex interplay of these factors. Although TMS had no direct neural effects, both pre- and post-stimulus TMS time windows modulated task performance on both a sensory detection task and a cognitive angle judgment task. For the most part, these effects were quantitatively similar across tasks but effect sizes were clearly different. Moreover, the effects of real and sham TMS were almost identical with interesting exceptions that shed light on the relative contribution of auditory and somato-sensory aspects of a TMS pulse. Knowledge of such effects is of critical importance for the interpretation of TMS experiments and helps deciding what constitutes an appropriate control condition. Our results broaden the empirical basis of control strategies in TMS research and point at potential pitfalls that should be avoided.
经颅磁刺激(TMS)在人类脑科学实验中被广泛应用于操纵脑活动。除了预期的神经效应外,每个 TMS 脉冲在头部都会产生独特的点击声和感觉,这也会影响任务表现。因此,需要仔细考虑对照条件,以确保感兴趣的行为效应可以归因于 TMS 的神经后果,而不是 TMS 脉冲的非神经效应。令人惊讶的是,尽管 TMS 的这些非神经效应在很大程度上是未知的,但它们通常被认为是不特异的,即不依赖于 TMS 参数。这种假设是 TMS 研究中许多对照策略的固有假设,但最近已被经验依据所挑战。在这里,我们进一步发展了 TMS 研究中对照策略的经验基础。我们研究了 TMS 非神经效应的时间依赖性和任务依赖性,并比较了顶点处的真实 TMS 和假 TMS。重要的是,我们表明非神经 TMS 效应取决于这些因素的复杂相互作用。尽管 TMS 没有直接的神经效应,但刺激前后的 TMS 时间窗口都会调节感觉检测任务和认知角度判断任务的任务表现。在大多数情况下,这些效应在两个任务中在数量上是相似的,但效应大小明显不同。此外,真实 TMS 和假 TMS 的效应几乎相同,但有一些有趣的例外,这些例外揭示了 TMS 脉冲的听觉和躯体感觉方面的相对贡献。了解这些效应对于 TMS 实验的解释至关重要,并有助于确定什么构成了适当的对照条件。我们的结果拓宽了 TMS 研究中对照策略的经验基础,并指出了应该避免的潜在陷阱。