Lojowska M, Gerbracht J M, Engelmann J B, Roelofs K, Mulckhuyse M
Social Psychology, Leiden University, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Cognitive Psychology, Leiden University, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2025 Jun;25(3):668-678. doi: 10.3758/s13415-025-01275-3. Epub 2025 Mar 26.
Reorientation of attention to threatening stimuli is a fundamental part of human cognition. Such interaction between cognitive and affective processes is often associated with faster response times. In the present study, the role of the right angular gyrus (AG) in reorienting to threat is examined. An exogenous spatial cueing paradigm was adopted with threatening and nonthreatening targets. Threat was induced by means of differential fear conditioning of the target. Single pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) was applied to the right AG at different stimulus onset asynchronies (SOA) after target onset (range 30-300 ms). Transcranial magnetic stimulation was predicted to interfere at an earlier SOA with reorienting (during invalidly cued trials) to threatening targets. Even though an overall decrement in performance to targets contralateral to TMS stimulation was found, TMS to right AG did not specifically affect reorienting, neither to safe nor to threatening targets. We suggest that detection of biologically significant stimuli outside the focus of attention may depend more on the ventral frontoparietal rather than dorsal frontoparietal network of attention.
将注意力重新定向到威胁性刺激上是人类认知的一个基本组成部分。认知与情感过程之间的这种相互作用通常与更快的反应时间相关。在本研究中,我们考察了右侧角回(AG)在重新定向到威胁方面的作用。采用了一种带有威胁性和非威胁性目标的外源性空间线索范式。通过对目标进行差异恐惧条件反射来诱发威胁。在目标出现后不同的刺激起始异步时间(SOA,范围为30 - 300毫秒),对右侧AG施加单脉冲经颅磁刺激(TMS)。经颅磁刺激预计会在较早的SOA干扰对威胁性目标的重新定向(在无效线索试验期间)。尽管发现对TMS刺激对侧目标的表现总体下降,但对右侧AG的TMS并没有特别影响重新定向,无论是对安全目标还是威胁性目标。我们认为,在注意力焦点之外检测具有生物学意义的刺激可能更多地依赖于腹侧额顶叶而不是背侧额顶叶注意力网络。