Suppr超能文献

听觉混淆可能会影响经颅超声刺激在人类身上的在线效应。

Auditory confounds can drive online effects of transcranial ultrasonic stimulation in humans.

机构信息

Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition, and Behaviour; Radboud University Nijmegen, Nijmegen, Netherlands.

Krembil Research Institute, University Health Network; University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.

出版信息

Elife. 2024 Aug 27;12:RP88762. doi: 10.7554/eLife.88762.

Abstract

Transcranial ultrasonic stimulation (TUS) is rapidly emerging as a promising non-invasive neuromodulation technique. TUS is already well-established in animal models, providing foundations to now optimize neuromodulatory efficacy for human applications. Across multiple studies, one promising protocol, pulsed at 1000 Hz, has consistently resulted in motor cortical inhibition in humans (Fomenko et al., 2020). At the same time, a parallel research line has highlighted the potentially confounding influence of peripheral auditory stimulation arising from TUS pulsing at audible frequencies. In this study, we disentangle direct neuromodulatory and indirect auditory contributions to motor inhibitory effects of TUS. To this end, we include tightly matched control conditions across four experiments, one preregistered, conducted independently at three institutions. We employed a combined transcranial ultrasonic and magnetic stimulation paradigm, where TMS-elicited motor-evoked potentials (MEPs) served as an index of corticospinal excitability. First, we replicated motor inhibitory effects of TUS but showed through both tight controls and manipulation of stimulation intensity, duration, and auditory masking conditions that this inhibition was driven by peripheral auditory stimulation, not direct neuromodulation. Furthermore, we consider neuromodulation beyond driving overall excitation/inhibition and show preliminary evidence of how TUS might interact with ongoing neural dynamics instead. Primarily, this study highlights the substantial shortcomings in accounting for the auditory confound in prior TUS-TMS work where only a flip-over sham and no active control was used. The field must critically reevaluate previous findings given the demonstrated impact of peripheral confounds. Furthermore, rigorous experimental design via (in)active control conditions is required to make substantiated claims in future TUS studies. Only when direct effects are disentangled from those driven by peripheral confounds can TUS fully realize its potential for research and clinical applications.

摘要

经颅超声刺激(TUS)作为一种有前途的非侵入性神经调节技术正在迅速兴起。TUS 在动物模型中已经得到了很好的建立,为现在优化人类应用的神经调节效果提供了基础。在多项研究中,一种有前途的方案,以 1000Hz 的频率进行脉冲刺激,在人类中始终导致运动皮层抑制(Fomenko 等人,2020)。与此同时,平行的研究路线强调了 TUS 以可听频率脉冲产生的外周听觉刺激的潜在混杂影响。在这项研究中,我们将直接神经调节和 TUS 脉冲产生的间接听觉对 TUS 运动抑制效应的贡献分开。为此,我们在四个实验中包括了紧密匹配的对照条件,其中一个是预先注册的,在三个机构独立进行。我们采用了联合经颅超声和磁刺激范式,其中 TMS 诱发的运动诱发电位(MEPs)作为皮质脊髓兴奋性的指标。首先,我们复制了 TUS 的运动抑制效应,但通过严格的对照和刺激强度、持续时间和听觉掩蔽条件的操作表明,这种抑制是由外周听觉刺激引起的,而不是直接的神经调节。此外,我们考虑了神经调节对整体兴奋/抑制的影响,并展示了初步证据表明 TUS 如何与正在进行的神经动力学相互作用。本研究主要强调了在先前的 TUS-TMS 工作中,仅使用翻转假刺激而没有主动对照时,考虑听觉混杂因素的重要性。鉴于外周混杂因素的影响已经得到证明,该领域必须批判性地重新评估先前的发现。此外,需要通过(不)主动对照条件进行严格的实验设计,以便在未来的 TUS 研究中提出有根据的结论。只有当直接效应与由外周混杂因素引起的效应分开时,TUS 才能充分发挥其在研究和临床应用中的潜力。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/16f0/11349300/d937fc3964ed/elife-88762-fig1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验