Palmer Center for Chiropractic Research, Palmer College of Chiropractic, Davenport, IA, USA.
BMC Complement Altern Med. 2013 Sep 16;13:225. doi: 10.1186/1472-6882-13-225.
While older adults may seek care for low back pain (LBP) from both medical doctors (MDs) and doctors of chiropractic (DCs), co-management between these providers is uncommon. The purposes of this study were to describe the preferences of older adults for LBP co-management by MDs and DCs and to identify their concerns for receiving care under such a treatment model.
We conducted 10 focus groups with 48 older adults who received LBP care in the past year. Interviews explored participants' care seeking experiences, co-management preferences, and perceived challenges to successful implementation of a MD-DC co-management model. We analyzed the qualitative data using thematic content analysis.
Older adults considered LBP co-management by MDs and DCs a positive approach as the professions have complementary strengths. Participants wanted providers who worked in a co-management model to talk openly and honestly about LBP, offer clear and consistent recommendations about treatment, and provide individualized care. Facilitators of MD-DC co-management included collegial relationships between providers, arrangements between doctors to support interdisciplinary referral, computer systems that allowed exchange of health information between clinics, and practice settings where providers worked in one location. Perceived barriers to the co-management of LBP included the financial costs associated with receiving care from multiple providers concurrently, duplication of tests or imaging, scheduling and transportation problems, and potential side effects of medication and chiropractic care. A few participants expressed concern that some providers would not support a patient-preferred co-managed care model.
Older adults are interested in receiving LBP treatment co-managed by MDs and DCs. Older adults considered patient-centered communication, collegial interdisciplinary interactions between these providers, and administrative supports such as scheduling systems and health record sharing as key components for successful LBP co-management.
老年人可能会同时向医生(MD)和脊椎按摩师(DC)寻求腰痛(LBP)的治疗,但这两种提供者之间的共同管理并不常见。本研究的目的是描述老年人对 MD 和 DC 共同管理 LBP 的偏好,并确定他们对接受这种治疗模式下的护理的担忧。
我们对过去一年接受过 LBP 治疗的 48 名老年人进行了 10 次焦点小组访谈。访谈探讨了参与者的护理寻求经验、共同管理偏好以及对成功实施 MD-DC 共同管理模式的潜在挑战。我们使用主题内容分析对定性数据进行了分析。
老年人认为 MD 和 DC 共同管理 LBP 是一种积极的方法,因为这两个专业有互补的优势。参与者希望共同管理模式下的提供者能够坦诚地讨论 LBP,提供明确一致的治疗建议,并提供个性化的护理。MD-DC 共同管理的促进因素包括提供者之间的良好关系、医生之间为支持跨学科转诊所做的安排、允许诊所之间交换健康信息的计算机系统以及提供者在一个地点工作的实践环境。LBP 共同管理的感知障碍包括同时从多个提供者处接受护理的相关费用、测试或影像学的重复、预约和交通问题,以及药物和脊椎按摩治疗的潜在副作用。一些参与者表示担心一些提供者不会支持患者首选的共同管理护理模式。
老年人对接受 MD 和 DC 共同管理的 LBP 治疗感兴趣。老年人认为以患者为中心的沟通、这些提供者之间的协作性跨学科互动以及预约系统和健康记录共享等行政支持是成功管理 LBP 的关键组成部分。