Médecins Sans Frontières (MSF), Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Confl Health. 2013 Sep 16;7(1):19. doi: 10.1186/1752-1505-7-19.
Médecins Sans Frontières (MSF) provides individual counselling interventions in medical humanitarian programmes in contexts affected by conflict and violence. Although mental health and psychosocial interventions are a common part of the humanitarian response, little is known about how the profile and outcomes for individuals seeking care differs across contexts. We did a retrospective analysis of routine programme data to determine who accessed MSF counselling services and why, and the individual and programmatic risk factors for poor outcomes.
We analysed data from 18 mental health projects run by MSF in 2009 in eight countries. Outcome measures were client-rating scores (1-10 scale; 1 worst) for complaint severity and functioning and counsellor assessment. The effect of client and programme factors on outcomes was assessed by multiple regression analysis. Logistic regression was used to assess binary outcome variables.
48704 counselling sessions were held with 14963 individuals. Excluding women-focused projects, 66.8% of patients were women. Mean (SD) age was 33.3 (14.1) years. Anxiety-related complaints were the most common (35.0%), followed by family-related problems (15.7%), mood-related problems (14.1%) and physical complaints (13.7%). Only 2.0% presented with a serious mental health condition. 27.2% did not identify a traumatic precipitating event. 24.6% identified domestic discord or violence and 17.5% psychological violence as the precipitating event. 6244 (43.9%) had only one session. For 91% of 7837 who returned, the counsellor reported the problem had decreased or resolved. The mean (SD) complaint rating improved by 4.7 (2.4) points (p < 0.001) and by 4.2 (2.3, p < 0.001) for functional rating. Risk factors for poorer outcomes were few sessions, non-conflict setting (stable or societal violence settings), serious mental health condition, or attending a large, recently opened project.
The majority of clients accessing counselling services present with anxiety related complaints. Attrition rates were high. Good outcomes were recorded among those who attended for more than one visit. Lessons learned included the importance of adaptation of approach in non-conflict contexts such as societal violence or post-conflict contexts. There is a need for further research to evaluate the intervention against a control group.
无国界医生组织(MSF)在受冲突和暴力影响的医疗人道主义项目中提供个人咨询干预措施。尽管心理健康和心理社会干预措施是人道主义应对措施的常见组成部分,但对于寻求护理的个人在不同背景下的特征和结果知之甚少。我们对常规项目数据进行了回顾性分析,以确定谁接受了无国界医生组织的咨询服务以及原因,以及个人和项目不良结果的风险因素。
我们分析了无国界医生组织在 2009 年在八个国家的 18 个心理健康项目中的数据。结果测量是客户评分(1-10 分制;1 分为最差),用于评估投诉严重程度和功能以及顾问评估。通过多元回归分析评估客户和项目因素对结果的影响。使用逻辑回归评估二项结果变量。
共进行了 48704 次咨询,共接待了 14963 人。不包括以女性为重点的项目,66.8%的患者为女性。平均(SD)年龄为 33.3(14.1)岁。焦虑相关投诉最为常见(35.0%),其次是家庭相关问题(15.7%)、情绪相关问题(14.1%)和身体投诉(13.7%)。只有 2.0%的人出现严重的心理健康问题。27.2%的人没有确定创伤性诱发事件。24.6%确定家庭不和或暴力以及 17.5%的心理暴力为诱发事件。6244 人(43.9%)仅进行了一次咨询。对于 7837 名返回的人中的 91%,顾问报告问题已经减轻或解决。投诉评分平均(SD)提高了 4.7(2.4)分(p<0.001),功能评分提高了 4.2(2.3,p<0.001)。预后较差的风险因素包括就诊次数少、非冲突环境(稳定或社会暴力环境)、严重的心理健康状况或在大型、新开设的项目就诊。
大多数寻求咨询服务的客户都有焦虑相关的投诉。流失率很高。那些就诊超过一次的人记录了良好的结果。吸取的教训包括在非冲突环境(如社会暴力或冲突后环境)中调整方法的重要性。需要进一步研究来评估该干预措施与对照组的比较。