Global Health Initiative, MacMillan Center, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06520-8206, USA.
Lancet. 2011 Oct 29;378(9802):1581-91. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(11)61094-5. Epub 2011 Oct 16.
This review links practice, funding, and evidence for interventions for mental health and psychosocial wellbeing in humanitarian settings. We studied practice by reviewing reports of mental health and psychosocial support activities (2007-10); funding by analysis of the financial tracking service and the creditor reporting system (2007-09); and interventions by systematic review and meta-analysis. In 160 reports, the five most commonly reported activities were basic counselling for individuals (39%); facilitation of community support of vulnerable individuals (23%); provision of child-friendly spaces (21%); support of community-initiated social support (21%); and basic counselling for groups and families (20%). Most interventions took place and were funded outside national mental health and protection systems. 32 controlled studies of interventions were identified, 13 of which were randomised controlled trials (RCTs) that met the criteria for meta-analysis. Two studies showed promising effects for strengthening community and family supports. Psychosocial wellbeing was not included as an outcome in the meta-analysis, because its definition varied across studies. In adults with symptoms of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), meta-analysis of seven RCTs showed beneficial effects for several interventions (psychotherapy and psychosocial supports) compared with usual care or waiting list (standardised mean difference [SMD] -0·38, 95% CI -0·55 to -0·20). In children, meta-analysis of four RCTs failed to show an effect for symptoms of PTSD (-0·36, -0·83 to 0·10), but showed a beneficial effect of interventions (group psychotherapy, school-based support, and other psychosocial support) for internalising symptoms (six RCTs; SMD -0·24, -0·40 to -0·09). Overall, research and evidence focuses on interventions that are infrequently implemented, whereas the most commonly used interventions have had little rigorous scrutiny.
本综述将实践、资金和干预措施的证据联系起来,以促进人道主义环境中的心理健康和心理社会福利。我们通过审查心理健康和心理社会支持活动报告(2007-10 年)来研究实践情况;通过对财务跟踪服务和债权人报告系统的分析来研究资金情况(2007-09 年);并通过系统综述和荟萃分析来研究干预措施。在 160 份报告中,报告最多的五项活动是为个人提供基本咨询(39%);促进弱势群体的社区支持(23%);提供儿童友好空间(21%);支持社区发起的社会支持(21%);以及为群体和家庭提供基本咨询(20%)。大多数干预措施都在国家心理健康和保护系统之外进行,并获得了资金。确定了 32 项对照干预研究,其中 13 项是符合荟萃分析标准的随机对照试验(RCT)。两项研究显示,加强社区和家庭支持具有良好效果。心理社会福利没有被纳入荟萃分析的结果,因为它在研究中定义不同。在有创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)症状的成年人中,对七项 RCT 的荟萃分析显示,几种干预措施(心理治疗和心理社会支持)与常规护理或等待名单相比具有有益效果(标准化均数差[SMD]-0.38,95%CI-0.55 至-0.20)。在儿童中,四项 RCT 的荟萃分析未能显示 PTSD 症状的效果(-0.36,-0.83 至 0.10),但显示干预措施(团体心理治疗、基于学校的支持和其他心理社会支持)对内化症状有有益效果(六项 RCT;SMD-0.24,-0.40 至-0.09)。总体而言,研究和证据主要集中在干预措施上,这些干预措施很少实施,而最常用的干预措施几乎没有经过严格审查。