Suppr超能文献

机器人与腹腔镜肝切除术的比较:一项匹配对照研究。

Robotic versus laparoscopic hepatectomy: a matched comparison.

机构信息

*Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery and †Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh ‡Division of General and Oncologic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Maryland Medical Center, Baltimore, MD.

出版信息

Ann Surg. 2014 Mar;259(3):549-55. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000000250.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To perform a matched comparison of surgical and postsurgical outcomes between our robotic and laparoscopic hepatic resection experience.

BACKGROUND

The application of robotic technology and technique to liver surgery has grown. Robotic methods may have the potential to overcome certain laparoscopic disadvantages, but few studies have drawn a matched comparison of outcomes between robotic and laparoscopic liver resections.

METHODS

Demographics, intraoperative variables, and postoperative outcomes among patients undergoing robotic (n = 57) and laparoscopic (n = 114) hepatic resections between November 2007 and December 2011 were reviewed. A 1:2 matched analysis was performed by individually matching patients in the robotic cohort to patients in the laparoscopic cohort based on demographics, comorbidities, performance status, and extent of liver resection.

RESULTS

Matched patients undergoing robotic and laparoscopic liver resections displayed no significant differences in operative and postoperative outcomes as measured by blood loss, transfusion rate, R0 negative margin rate, postoperative peak bilirubin, postoperative intensive care unit admission rate, length of stay, and 90-day mortality. Patients undergoing robotic liver surgery had significantly longer operative times (median: 253 vs 199 minutes) and overall room times (median: 342 vs 262 minutes) compared with their laparoscopic counterparts. However, the robotic approach allowed for an increased percentage of major hepatectomies to be performed in a purely minimally invasive fashion (81% vs 7.1%, P < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

This is the largest series comparing robotic to laparoscopic liver resections. Robotic and laparoscopic liver resection display similar safety and feasibility for hepatectomies. Although a greater proportion of robotic cases were completed in a totally minimally invasive manner, there were no significant benefits over laparoscopic techniques in operative outcomes.

摘要

目的

对我们的机器人辅助与腹腔镜肝切除术的手术和术后结果进行配对比较。

背景

机器人技术和技术在肝外科中的应用不断增加。机器人方法可能有潜力克服某些腹腔镜的缺点,但很少有研究对机器人与腹腔镜肝切除术的结果进行配对比较。

方法

回顾了 2007 年 11 月至 2011 年 12 月期间接受机器人(n = 57)和腹腔镜(n = 114)肝切除术的患者的人口统计学、术中变量和术后结果。通过在机器人队列中对患者进行单独匹配,根据人口统计学、合并症、表现状态和肝切除范围,与腹腔镜队列中的患者进行 1:2 匹配分析。

结果

在衡量手术和术后结果的各个方面,如出血量、输血率、R0 阴性切缘率、术后胆红素峰值、术后重症监护病房入住率、住院时间和 90 天死亡率等,接受机器人和腹腔镜肝切除术的匹配患者之间没有显著差异。与腹腔镜手术相比,接受机器人肝手术的患者手术时间(中位数:253 分钟比 199 分钟)和总手术时间(中位数:342 分钟比 262 分钟)显著延长。然而,机器人方法使更多的主要肝切除术可以以纯微创的方式进行(81%比 7.1%,P < 0.05)。

结论

这是比较机器人与腹腔镜肝切除术的最大系列研究。机器人和腹腔镜肝切除术在肝切除方面具有相似的安全性和可行性。虽然机器人手术的比例更高,但在手术结果方面,与腹腔镜技术相比,并没有显著优势。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验