Suppr超能文献

基于隐马尔可夫模型和支持向量机的脑电手指运动解码。

Hidden Markov model and support vector machine based decoding of finger movements using electrocorticography.

机构信息

Chair for Healthcare Telematics and Medical Engineering, Otto-von-Guericke-University Magdeburg, Postfach 4120, D-39016 Magdeburg, Germany.

出版信息

J Neural Eng. 2013 Oct;10(5):056020. doi: 10.1088/1741-2560/10/5/056020. Epub 2013 Sep 18.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Support vector machines (SVM) have developed into a gold standard for accurate classification in brain-computer interfaces (BCI). The choice of the most appropriate classifier for a particular application depends on several characteristics in addition to decoding accuracy. Here we investigate the implementation of hidden Markov models (HMM) for online BCIs and discuss strategies to improve their performance.

APPROACH

We compare the SVM, serving as a reference, and HMMs for classifying discrete finger movements obtained from electrocorticograms of four subjects performing a finger tapping experiment. The classifier decisions are based on a subset of low-frequency time domain and high gamma oscillation features.

MAIN RESULTS

We show that decoding optimization between the two approaches is due to the way features are extracted and selected and less dependent on the classifier. An additional gain in HMM performance of up to 6% was obtained by introducing model constraints. Comparable accuracies of up to 90% were achieved with both SVM and HMM with the high gamma cortical response providing the most important decoding information for both techniques.

SIGNIFICANCE

We discuss technical HMM characteristics and adaptations in the context of the presented data as well as for general BCI applications. Our findings suggest that HMMs and their characteristics are promising for efficient online BCIs.

摘要

目的

支持向量机(SVM)已成为脑机接口(BCI)中准确分类的黄金标准。除了解码准确性之外,选择最适合特定应用的分类器还取决于几个特性。在这里,我们研究了隐马尔可夫模型(HMM)在在线 BCI 中的实现,并讨论了提高其性能的策略。

方法

我们将 SVM 作为参考,比较了其与 HMM 对四个进行手指敲击实验的受试者的脑电记录中的离散手指运动的分类。分类器决策基于低频时域和高伽马振荡特征的子集。

主要结果

我们表明,两种方法之间的解码优化是由于特征的提取和选择方式,而不是分类器的依赖性。通过引入模型约束,可以使 HMM 的性能提高多达 6%。使用 SVM 和 HMM 都可以达到高达 90%的准确率,高伽马皮质反应为两种技术提供了最重要的解码信息。

意义

我们根据所提供的数据以及一般 BCI 应用讨论了 HMM 的技术特征和适应性。我们的发现表明,HMM 及其特征对于高效的在线 BCI 具有很大的应用前景。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cda0/3901317/cc029020ad0c/nihms528912f1.jpg

相似文献

引用本文的文献

5
Electroencephalogram Access for Emotion Recognition Based on a Deep Hybrid Network.基于深度混合网络的脑电图情感识别方法
Front Hum Neurosci. 2020 Dec 16;14:589001. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2020.589001. eCollection 2020.
6
Progress in Neuroengineering for brain repair: New challenges and open issues.用于脑修复的神经工程学进展:新挑战与未决问题
Brain Neurosci Adv. 2018 May 21;2:2398212818776475. doi: 10.1177/2398212818776475. eCollection 2018 Jan-Dec.

本文引用的文献

4
A cluster separation measure.一种聚类分离度量。
IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell. 1979 Feb;1(2):224-7.
6
Introduction to machine learning for brain imaging.脑影像机器学习导论。
Neuroimage. 2011 May 15;56(2):387-99. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.11.004. Epub 2010 Dec 21.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验