Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Shaare Zedek Medical Center, the Hebrew University, Jerusalem 91031, Israel.
Hum Reprod. 2013 Nov;28(11):3007-11. doi: 10.1093/humrep/det354. Epub 2013 Sep 17.
Do clinicians manage pregnancies conceived by assisted reproductive technologies (ART) differently from spontaneous pregnancies?
Clinicians' decisions about prenatal testing during pregnancy depend, at least partially, on the method of conception.
Research thus far has shown that patients' decisions regarding prenatal screening are different in ART pregnancies compared with spontaneous ones, such that ART pregnancies may be considered more valuable or 'precious' than pregnancies conceived without treatment.
STUDY DESIGN, SIZE AND DURATION: In this cross-sectional study, preformed during the year 2011, 163 obstetricians and gynecologists in Israel completed an anonymous online questionnaire.
PARTICIPANTS, SETTING, METHODS: Clinicians were randomly assigned to read one of two versions of a vignette describing the case of a pregnant woman. The two versions differed only with regard to the method of conception (ART; n = 78 versus spontaneous; n = 85). Clinicians were asked to provide their recommendations regarding amniocentesis.
The response rate among all clinicians invited to complete the questionnaire was 16.7%. Of the 85 clinicians presented with the spontaneous pregnancy scenario, 37 (43.5%) recommended amniocentesis. In contrast, of the 78 clinicians presented with the ART pregnancy scenario, only 15 (19.2%) recommended the test. Clinicians were 3.2 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.6-6.6) times more likely to recommend amniocentesis for a spontaneous pregnancy than for an ART pregnancy.
The study is limited by a low response rate, the relatively small sample and the hypothetical nature of the decision, as clinician recommendations may have differed in an actual clinical setting.
Our findings show that fertility history and use of ART may affect clinicians' recommendations regarding amniocentesis following receipt of screening test results. This raises the question of how subjective factors influence clinicians' decisions regarding other aspects of pregnancy management.
There was no funding source to this study. The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
临床医生在管理辅助生殖技术(ART)受孕的妊娠和自然受孕的妊娠方面是否有所不同?
临床医生在妊娠期间进行产前检查的决定至少部分取决于受孕方式。
迄今为止的研究表明,与自然受孕的妊娠相比,ART 妊娠中患者对产前筛查的决策有所不同,以至于 ART 妊娠可能被认为比未经治疗的妊娠更有价值或“珍贵”。
研究设计、大小和持续时间:在这项 2011 年进行的横断面研究中,以色列的 163 名妇产科医生完成了一份匿名在线问卷。
参与者、设置和方法:临床医生被随机分配阅读描述一名孕妇病例的两个版本的案例。这两个版本仅在受孕方式(ART;n=78 与自然受孕;n=85)上有所不同。临床医生被要求提供羊膜穿刺术的建议。
所有受邀完成问卷的临床医生的回复率为 16.7%。在接受自然受孕情景的 85 名临床医生中,有 37 名(43.5%)建议进行羊膜穿刺术。相比之下,在接受 ART 妊娠情景的 78 名临床医生中,只有 15 名(19.2%)建议进行该测试。与 ART 妊娠相比,临床医生更有可能推荐对自然受孕的妊娠进行羊膜穿刺术,可能性是 3.2 倍(95%置信区间[CI]:1.6-6.6)。
该研究受到低回复率、样本相对较小以及决策假设性质的限制,因为在实际临床环境中,临床医生的建议可能会有所不同。
我们的研究结果表明,生育史和使用 ART 可能会影响临床医生在收到筛查测试结果后对羊膜穿刺术的建议。这提出了一个问题,即主观因素如何影响临床医生对妊娠管理其他方面的决策。
本研究没有资金来源。作者声明没有利益冲突。