• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

前交叉韧带增强与非增强一期修复的生物力学评估:一项体内动物研究。

Biomechanical evaluation of augmented and nonaugmented primary repair of the anterior cruciate ligament: an in vivo animal study.

作者信息

Seitz Helmut, Pichl Wofgang, Matzi Veronika, Nau Thomas

机构信息

Department of Trauma Surgery, Medical University of Graz, Auenbruggerplatz, Graz, Austria.

出版信息

Int Orthop. 2013 Nov;37(11):2305-11. doi: 10.1007/s00264-013-2098-8. Epub 2013 Sep 18.

DOI:10.1007/s00264-013-2098-8
PMID:24045909
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3824911/
Abstract

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to evaluate in a sheep model the biomechanical performance of augmented and nonaugmented primary repair of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) following transection at the femoral end during a 12-month postoperative observation.

METHODS

Forty sheep were randomly assigned to nonaugmented or augmented primary ACL repair using a polyethylene terephthalate (PET) band. At two, six, 16, 26 and 52 weeks postoperatively four sheep in each group were sacrificed and biomechanical testing performed.

RESULTS

Compared with nonaugmented primary ACL repair, the PET-augmented repair demonstrated superior biomechanical results from 16 weeks postoperatively onwards in terms of anterioposterior (AP) laxity, tensile strength and ligament stiffness. The augmentation device works as a stress shield during the ligament healing process. The nonaugmented ACL repair also resulted in ligament healing, but the biomechanical properties were at a significantly lower level.

CONCLUSION

These results support the previously reported histological findings following augmented primary ACL repair. This animal study on the healing capacity of the ACL may provide some important contributions to how primary healing in certain types of ruptures can be achieved.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

I.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在通过绵羊模型,评估在术后12个月的观察期内,股骨端横断后前交叉韧带(ACL)增强修复与非增强一期修复的生物力学性能。

方法

40只绵羊被随机分为两组,分别接受使用聚对苯二甲酸乙二酯(PET)带进行的非增强或增强一期ACL修复。术后2周、6周、16周、26周和52周时,每组处死4只绵羊并进行生物力学测试。

结果

与非增强一期ACL修复相比,PET增强修复从术后16周起在前后(AP)松弛度、拉伸强度和韧带刚度方面显示出更好的生物力学结果。增强装置在韧带愈合过程中起到应力屏蔽的作用。非增强ACL修复也实现了韧带愈合,但其生物力学性能显著较低。

结论

这些结果支持了先前报道的ACL增强一期修复后的组织学研究结果。这项关于ACL愈合能力的动物研究可能为如何实现某些类型断裂的一期愈合提供一些重要参考。

临床意义

I.

相似文献

1
Biomechanical evaluation of augmented and nonaugmented primary repair of the anterior cruciate ligament: an in vivo animal study.前交叉韧带增强与非增强一期修复的生物力学评估:一项体内动物研究。
Int Orthop. 2013 Nov;37(11):2305-11. doi: 10.1007/s00264-013-2098-8. Epub 2013 Sep 18.
2
Histological evaluation of the healing potential of the anterior cruciate ligament by means of augmented and non-augmented repair: an in vivo animal study.通过增强修复和非增强修复手段对前交叉韧带愈合潜力的组织学评估:一项体内动物研究。
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2008 Dec;16(12):1087-93. doi: 10.1007/s00167-008-0599-6. Epub 2008 Aug 19.
3
Acute anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with an augmented remnant repair: a comparative macroscopic and biomechanical study in an animal model.急性前交叉韧带重建结合增强残端修复:动物模型的对比宏观和生物力学研究。
Arthroscopy. 2014 Mar;30(3):344-51. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2013.11.030.
4
Biomechanical Outcomes of Bridge-enhanced Anterior Cruciate Ligament Repair Are Influenced by Sex in a Preclinical Model.在临床前模型中,桥接增强前交叉韧带修复的生物力学结果受性别影响。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2015 Aug;473(8):2599-608. doi: 10.1007/s11999-015-4226-9.
5
Use of a bioactive scaffold to stimulate anterior cruciate ligament healing also minimizes posttraumatic osteoarthritis after surgery.使用生物活性支架刺激前交叉韧带愈合,也可以最大限度地减少手术后的创伤性骨关节炎。
Am J Sports Med. 2013 Aug;41(8):1762-70. doi: 10.1177/0363546513483446. Epub 2013 Jul 15.
6
Biomechanical outcomes after bioenhanced anterior cruciate ligament repair and anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction are equal in a porcine model.生物增强型前交叉韧带修复和前交叉韧带重建后的生物力学结果在猪模型中是相等的。
Arthroscopy. 2012 May;28(5):672-80. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2011.10.008. Epub 2012 Jan 20.
7
Efficacy of Nonaugmented, Static Augmented, and Dynamic Augmented Suture Repair of the Ruptured Anterior Cruciate Ligament: A Systematic Review of the Literature.非增强、静态增强和动态增强缝合修复前交叉韧带断裂的疗效:文献系统评价。
Am J Sports Med. 2020 Dec;48(14):3626-3637. doi: 10.1177/0363546520904690. Epub 2020 Feb 26.
8
Biomechanical and Biological Findings Between Acute Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction With and Without an Augmented Remnant Repair: A Comparative in Vivo Animal Study.急性前交叉韧带重建中有无增强残端修复的生物力学和生物学研究结果:一项体内动物对比研究
Arthroscopy. 2016 Feb;32(2):307-19. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2015.08.011. Epub 2015 Oct 23.
9
Therapeutic advantage in selective ligament augmentation for partial tears of the anterior cruciate ligament: results in an animal model.选择性韧带增强治疗前交叉韧带部分撕裂的治疗优势:动物模型的结果。
Am J Sports Med. 2013 Feb;41(2):365-73. doi: 10.1177/0363546512471614. Epub 2013 Jan 8.
10
Comparison of graft healing in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with and without a preserved remnant in rabbits.兔前交叉韧带重建中保留与不保留残端时移植物愈合情况的比较。
Knee. 2013 Dec;20(6):537-44. doi: 10.1016/j.knee.2013.09.004. Epub 2013 Sep 19.

引用本文的文献

1
The Anatomic Biologic Anterior Cruciate Ligament Primary Repair Technique.解剖生物学前交叉韧带一期修复技术
Arthrosc Tech. 2025 May 29;14(8):103660. doi: 10.1016/j.eats.2025.103660. eCollection 2025 Aug.
2
Landing Biomechanics in Patients 2 Years After Augmented ACL Repair and 2 Years After Hamstring Autograft ACL Reconstruction Compared With Controls.与对照组相比,前交叉韧带(ACL)增强修复术后2年及自体腘绳肌腱ACL重建术后2年患者的着陆生物力学
Orthop J Sports Med. 2025 Jul 25;13(7):23259671251358386. doi: 10.1177/23259671251358386. eCollection 2025 Jul.
3
Anterior Cruciate Ligament Repair With Suture Tape Augmentation Using Self-Tapping Knotless Anchors.使用自攻无结锚钉进行缝线带增强的前交叉韧带修复术。
Arthrosc Tech. 2025 Apr 2;14(6):103532. doi: 10.1016/j.eats.2025.103532. eCollection 2025 Jun.
4
Primary Suture Tape Repair and Dynamic Internal Brace Augmentation for the Partial Anterior Cruciate Ligament Tears.原发性缝线带修复和动态内支撑增强术治疗部分前交叉韧带撕裂
Arthrosc Tech. 2024 Dec 26;14(5):103368. doi: 10.1016/j.eats.2024.103368. eCollection 2025 May.
5
Stabilization and Gap Formation of Adjustable Versus Fixed Primary ACL Repair With Internal Brace: An in Vitro Full-Construct Biomechanical Cadaveric Study.使用内置支撑装置的可调式与固定式原发性前交叉韧带修复的稳定性及间隙形成:一项体外全结构生物力学尸体研究。
Orthop J Sports Med. 2023 Sep 29;11(9):23259671231201462. doi: 10.1177/23259671231201462. eCollection 2023 Sep.
6
Material Properties of Suture Augmentation of Knee Medial Collateral Ligament Repair Did Not Influence Length Changes or Failure Loads in a Caged Porcine Model.在笼养猪模型中,膝关节内侧副韧带修复缝线增强术的材料特性不影响长度变化或失效载荷。
Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil. 2023 Apr 8;5(3):e629-e635. doi: 10.1016/j.asmr.2023.03.002. eCollection 2023 Jun.
7
A regeneration process-matching scaffold with appropriate dynamic mechanical properties and spatial adaptability for ligament reconstruction.一种具有合适动态力学性能和空间适应性的用于韧带重建的再生过程匹配支架。
Bioact Mater. 2021 Nov 12;13:82-95. doi: 10.1016/j.bioactmat.2021.11.001. eCollection 2022 Jul.
8
The Comparison of Clinical Result between Primary Repair of the Anterior Cruciate Ligament with Additional Internal Bracing and Anatomic Single Bundle Reconstruction-A Retrospective Study.前交叉韧带初次修复联合额外内支撑与解剖单束重建临床结果的比较——一项回顾性研究
J Clin Med. 2021 Aug 31;10(17):3948. doi: 10.3390/jcm10173948.
9
Percutaneous Anterior Cruciate Ligament Repair With Needle Arthroscopy and Biological Augmentation.经皮前交叉韧带修复术:针式关节镜检查与生物增强技术
Arthrosc Tech. 2021 Jan 16;10(2):e289-e295. doi: 10.1016/j.eats.2020.10.006. eCollection 2021 Feb.
10
Suture Tape Augmentation Has No Effect on Anterior Tibial Translation, Gap Formation, or Load to Failure of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Repair: A Biomechanical Pilot Study.缝线带增强术对前交叉韧带修复的胫骨前移、间隙形成或失效载荷无影响:一项生物力学初步研究。
Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil. 2021 Jan 11;3(1):e233-e239. doi: 10.1016/j.asmr.2020.09.016. eCollection 2021 Feb.

本文引用的文献

1
The evolution of ACL reconstruction over the last fifty years.ACL 重建术的五十年演变历程。
Int Orthop. 2013 Feb;37(2):181-6. doi: 10.1007/s00264-012-1759-3. Epub 2013 Jan 16.
2
Comparative study between mono-bundle bone-patellar tendon-bone, double-bundle hamstring and mono-bundle bone-patellar tendon-bone combined with a modified Lemaire extra-articular procedure in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.前交叉韧带重建中单束骨-髌腱-骨、双束腘绳肌腱和单束骨-髌腱-骨联合改良 Lemaire 关节外技术的对比研究。
Int Orthop. 2013 Feb;37(2):193-9. doi: 10.1007/s00264-012-1718-z. Epub 2012 Nov 25.
3
Clinical outcome and prevalence of osteoarthritis after isolated anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using hamstring graft: follow-up after two and ten years.单纯前交叉韧带重建术后使用腘绳肌腱移植物的临床结果和骨关节炎的发生率:2 年和 10 年随访。
Int Orthop. 2013 Feb;37(2):271-7. doi: 10.1007/s00264-012-1653-z. Epub 2012 Sep 2.
4
Biomechanical outcomes after bioenhanced anterior cruciate ligament repair and anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction are equal in a porcine model.生物增强型前交叉韧带修复和前交叉韧带重建后的生物力学结果在猪模型中是相等的。
Arthroscopy. 2012 May;28(5):672-80. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2011.10.008. Epub 2012 Jan 20.
5
The potential for primary repair of the ACL.前交叉韧带一期修复的可能性。
Sports Med Arthrosc Rev. 2011 Mar;19(1):44-9. doi: 10.1097/JSA.0b013e3182095e5d.
6
The effect of skeletal maturity on functional healing of the anterior cruciate ligament.骨骼成熟度对前交叉韧带功能愈合的影响。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2010 Sep 1;92(11):2039-49. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.I.01368.
7
Age dependence of expression of growth factor receptors in porcine ACL fibroblasts.猪前交叉韧带成纤维细胞生长因子受体表达的年龄依赖性。
J Orthop Res. 2010 Aug;28(8):1107-12. doi: 10.1002/jor.21111.
8
Immature animals have higher cellular density in the healing anterior cruciate ligament than adolescent or adult animals.在愈合的前交叉韧带中,幼小动物的细胞密度高于青少年或成年动物。
J Orthop Res. 2010 Aug;28(8):1100-6. doi: 10.1002/jor.21070.
9
The effect of skeletal maturity on the regenerative function of intrinsic ACL cells.骨骼成熟度对 ACL 细胞内在再生功能的影响。
J Orthop Res. 2010 May;28(5):644-51. doi: 10.1002/jor.21018.
10
Current status and potential of primary ACL repair.前交叉韧带一期修复的现状与潜力
Clin Sports Med. 2009 Jan;28(1):51-61. doi: 10.1016/j.csm.2008.08.005.