Reilingh M L, Kerkhoffs G M M J, Telkamp C J A, Struijs P A A, van Dijk C N
Orthopaedic Research Center Amsterdam, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, PO Box 22660, 1100 DD, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2014 Sep;22(9):2243-9. doi: 10.1007/s00167-013-2685-7. Epub 2013 Sep 18.
Osteochondral talar defects are infrequent in children, and little is known about the treatment and clinical outcome of these defects. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical and radiographic outcomes of conservative and primary surgically treated osteochondral talar defects in skeletally immature children.
Thirty-six (97%) of 37 eligible patients with a symptomatic primary osteochondral talar defect were evaluated after a median follow-up of 4 years (range 1-12 years). Clinical assessment included the Berndt and Harty outcome question, Ogilvie-Harris score, Visual Analog Scale pain score (at rest, during walking and during running), the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) score, and the SF-36. Weight-bearing radiographs were compared with preoperative radiographs with the use of an ankle osteoarthritis classification system.
Ninety-two per cent of the initially conservatively treated children [mean age 13 years (SD 2)] were eventually scheduled to undergo surgery. After fixation of the fragment, seven cases (78%) reported a good Berndt and Harty outcome, and two cases (22%) a fair outcome; the median AOFAS score was 95.0 (range 77-100). After debridement and bone marrow stimulation, 13 cases (62%) reported a good Berndt and Harty outcome, three cases (14%) a fair outcome, and five cases (24%) a poor outcome; the median AOFAS score was 95.0 (range 45-100). No signs of degenerative changes were seen in both groups at follow-up.
Fixation and debridement and bone marrow stimulation of an osteochondral talar defect are both good surgical options after failed conservative treatment.
Retrospective case series, Therapeutic, Level IV.
儿童距骨骨软骨损伤并不常见,对于这些损伤的治疗及临床结果了解甚少。本研究旨在评估骨骼未成熟儿童中,保守治疗和初次手术治疗距骨骨软骨损伤的临床及影像学结果。
37例符合条件的有症状原发性距骨骨软骨损伤患者中的36例(97%)在中位随访4年(范围1 - 12年)后接受评估。临床评估包括伯恩特和哈蒂结果问题、奥吉尔维 - 哈里斯评分、视觉模拟量表疼痛评分(静息时、行走时和跑步时)、美国矫形足踝协会(AOFAS)评分以及SF - 36。使用踝关节骨关节炎分类系统将负重位X线片与术前X线片进行比较。
最初接受保守治疗的儿童[平均年龄13岁(标准差2)]中,92%最终计划接受手术。碎片固定后,7例(78%)报告伯恩特和哈蒂结果良好,2例(22%)结果尚可;AOFAS评分中位数为95.0(范围77 - 100)。清创和骨髓刺激后,13例(62%)报告伯恩特和哈蒂结果良好,3例(14%)结果尚可,5例(24%)结果较差;AOFAS评分中位数为95.0(范围45 - 100)。随访时两组均未发现退变改变迹象。
距骨骨软骨损伤保守治疗失败后,固定以及清创和骨髓刺激都是不错的手术选择。
回顾性病例系列,治疗性,IV级。