Suppr超能文献

SRS 后颅内放射性坏死的诊断和治疗实践模式问卷调查结果。

Results of a questionnaire regarding practice patterns for the diagnosis and treatment of intracranial radiation necrosis after SRS.

机构信息

Radiation Oncology Department, Taussig Cancer Center, Cleveland Clinic, 9500 Euclid Avenue, Mailstop T-28, Cleveland, OH, 44195, USA.

出版信息

J Neurooncol. 2013 Dec;115(3):469-75. doi: 10.1007/s11060-013-1248-6. Epub 2013 Sep 18.

Abstract

Although stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) is an effective treatment option for patients with brain tumors, its increased use has raised concern for increased incidence of radiation necrosis (RN). No established standard or guidelines exists regarding non-invasive techniques to diagnose or treat RN. This study was conducted to assess current patterns of evaluation and treatment of RN among physicians who treat intracranial malignancies. A questionnaire consisting of 20 questions was sent to 3,041 members of the American Society for Radiation Oncology (ASTRO) and the Society for Neurologic Oncology (SNO). Questions addressed demographics, utilization of SRS, perceptions regarding RN diagnosis treatment, approach to steroid-refractory RN, and management of two clinical scenarios using Kwiksurvey© software. The survey response rate was 8.74 % (266/3,041). Most respondents practice in an academic and/or university setting (62 %) at a facility that performs SRS (94 %) with a variety of systems. The number of annual cases performed at the participant's institution varied from <50 to >400, with a wide degree of variability. Most respondents practice at an institution that performs 50-100 cases/year (28 %). The most common range of symptomatic RN seen in clinical practice was 1-5 % (61 %). Most respondents reported that asymptomatic RN occurs in 6-10 % (33 %). Favored non-invasive diagnostic mechanisms were clinical evaluation (37 %) and MRI (19 %). In response to a clinical scenario depicting an asymptomatic patient post-SRS for brain metastasis with an enlarging lesion and edema at the treatment site, most respondents felt the image represented RN or a combination of RN and tumor progression. Most (58 %) favored short-term follow-up with repeat MRI. Ninety-three percent of the respondents initiated steroids as a first-line approach if patient was to develop symptoms. Steroids were the preferred first therapy in symptomatic patients on initial follow-up (81 %). In steroid-refractory patients, most recommend surgical intervention (63 %). Most physicians who responded to this questionnaire believe that post-SRS RN is uncommon (≤10 % of cases). The approach to establish the diagnosis of RN is variable. Steroids are the most commonly utilized first-line treatment for suspected RN. Considerable variation exists in the management of steroid-refractory RN. Additional studies are required to establish guidelines for evaluation and treatment of RN.

摘要

虽然立体定向放射外科(SRS)是治疗脑肿瘤患者的有效治疗选择,但随着其使用的增加,人们对放射性坏死(RN)发生率增加的担忧也在增加。目前还没有关于诊断和治疗 RN 的非侵入性技术的既定标准或指南。这项研究旨在评估治疗颅内恶性肿瘤的医生对 RN 的评估和治疗现状。我们向美国放射肿瘤学会(ASTRO)和神经肿瘤学会(SNO)的 3041 名成员发送了一份包含 20 个问题的调查问卷。这些问题涉及人口统计学、SRS 的使用、对 RN 诊断和治疗的看法、类固醇难治性 RN 的处理方法,以及使用 Kwiksurvey©软件对两种临床情况的管理。调查的回复率为 8.74%(266/3041)。大多数受访者在学术和/或大学环境中工作(62%),在进行 SRS 的机构工作(94%),使用各种系统。参与者所在机构每年进行的病例数从<50 例到>400 例不等,差异很大。大多数受访者在每年进行 50-100 例/年(28%)的机构工作。在临床实践中最常见的症状性 RN 范围是 1-5%(61%)。大多数受访者报告说无症状性 RN 发生在 6-10%(33%)。最受欢迎的非侵入性诊断机制是临床评估(37%)和 MRI(19%)。在对一个临床场景进行描述时,一名接受 SRS 治疗脑转移瘤的无症状患者,在治疗部位出现了病变增大和水肿,大多数受访者认为图像代表 RN 或 RN 与肿瘤进展的组合。大多数人(58%)倾向于短期随访,重复 MRI。如果患者出现症状,93%的受访者将首先使用类固醇作为一线治疗。在初始随访中出现症状的患者中,类固醇是首选的一线治疗药物(81%)。对于类固醇难治性患者,大多数人建议手术干预(63%)。对这个调查问卷做出回应的大多数医生认为,SRS 后 RN 并不常见(<10%的病例)。诊断 RN 的方法是多样的。类固醇是治疗疑似 RN 的最常用的一线治疗药物。对于类固醇难治性 RN 的管理存在很大差异。需要进一步的研究来制定评估和治疗 RN 的指南。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验