Scientific Institute for Quality of Healthcare, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
Scand J Prim Health Care. 2013 Jun;31(2):119-27. doi: 10.3109/02813432.2013.797178.
To study the effectiveness of a comprehensive diabetes programme in general practice that integrates patient-centred lifestyle counselling into structured diabetes care. Design and setting. Cluster randomised trial in general practices.
Nurse-led structured diabetes care with a protocol, record keeping, reminders, and feedback, plus training in motivational interviewing and agenda setting.
Primary care nurses in 58 general practices and their 940 type 2 diabetes patients with an HbA1c concentration above 7%, and a body mass index (BMI) above 25 kg/m². Main outcome measures. HbA1c, diet, and physical activity (medical records and patient questionnaires).
Multilevel linear and logistic regression analyses adjusted for baseline outcomes showed that despite active nurse participation in the intervention, the comprehensive programme was no more effective than usual care after 14 months, as shown by HbA1c levels (difference between groups = 0.13; CI 20.8-0.35) and diet (fat (difference between groups = 0.19; CI 20.82-1.21); vegetables (difference between groups = 0.10; CI-0.21-0.41); fruit (difference between groups = 20.02; CI 20.26-0.22)), and physical activity (difference between groups = 21.15; CI 212.26-9.97), or any of the other measures of clinical parameters, patient's readiness to change, or quality of life.
A comprehensive programme that integrated lifestyle counselling based on motivational interviewing principles integrated into structured diabetes care did not alter HbA1c or the lifestyle related to diet and physical activity. We thus question the impact of motivational interviewing in terms of its ability to improve routine diabetes care in general practice.
研究将以患者为中心的生活方式咨询融入结构化糖尿病管理中的综合糖尿病计划在全科医学中的有效性。
在全科诊所进行的集群随机试验。
护士主导的结构化糖尿病护理,包括方案、病历记录、提醒和反馈,以及动机访谈和议程设置培训。
58 家全科诊所的初级保健护士及其 940 名 2 型糖尿病患者,HbA1c 浓度高于 7%,且 BMI 高于 25 kg/m²。
HbA1c、饮食和身体活动(病历和患者问卷)。
多水平线性和逻辑回归分析调整了基线结果,结果表明,尽管护士积极参与了干预措施,但在 14 个月后,综合计划并不比常规护理更有效,这表现在 HbA1c 水平(组间差异=0.13;CI 20.8-0.35)和饮食(脂肪(组间差异=0.19;CI 20.82-1.21);蔬菜(组间差异=0.10;CI-0.21-0.41);水果(组间差异=20.02;CI 20.26-0.22))以及体力活动(组间差异=21.15;CI 212.26-9.97),或任何其他临床参数、患者改变准备情况或生活质量的测量指标。
将基于动机访谈原则的生活方式咨询整合到结构化糖尿病管理中的综合计划并未改变 HbA1c 或与饮食和体力活动相关的生活方式。因此,我们对动机访谈在改善一般实践中常规糖尿病护理方面的能力产生了质疑。