Loyola University of Chicago, 3016 Heritage Oak Lane, Oakbrook, IL, 60523, USA,
Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep. 2013 Nov;13(11):395. doi: 10.1007/s11910-013-0395-7.
Do vegetative state (VS) and minimally conscious state (MCS) patients experience emotions and have conscious awareness of themselves and their surroundings? Can neuroimaging clarify these questions? Neuroimaging responses to stimuli are classified into four levels: level 0 indicates no response; level 1 indicates responses limited to the primary sensory cortices; level 2 indicates activation of primary sensory cortices and higher-order associative areas; level 3 indicates activation of cortical regions to either mental imagery tasks or high-level language stimuli requiring distinction of ambiguous from unambiguous words. Level 0 or level 1 was noted in 125 of 193 VS patients (65 %) and 46 of 121 MCS patients (38 %), suggesting no evidence of conscious awareness. Level 2 or level 3 was observed in 68 of 193 VS patients (35 %) and 75 of 121 MCS patients (62 %), indicating some cognitive processing. These data may denote the presence of conscious awareness or may simply identify neuronal processing without phenomenological awareness. The pro and cons of these conflicting interpretations are discussed.
植物状态(VS)和最小意识状态(MCS)患者是否能体验情感,是否能意识到自己和周围环境?神经影像学能否阐明这些问题?对刺激的神经影像学反应分为四级:0 级表示无反应;1 级表示反应仅限于初级感觉皮层;2 级表示初级感觉皮层和高级联合区的激活;3 级表示大脑区域对心理意象任务或需要区分歧义词和非歧义词的高级语言刺激的激活。193 名 VS 患者中有 125 名(65%)和 121 名 MCS 患者中有 46 名(38%)表现为 0 级或 1 级,这表明没有意识的迹象。193 名 VS 患者中有 68 名(35%)和 121 名 MCS 患者中有 75 名(62%)表现为 2 级或 3 级,这表明存在一些认知处理。这些数据可能表示有意识的存在,也可能只是识别出没有现象意识的神经元处理。本文讨论了这些相互矛盾的解释的利弊。