Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Jewish General Hospital, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Victorian Order of Nurses of Canada, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2014 Jan;210(1):44.e1-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2013.09.021. Epub 2013 Sep 18.
Considerable time and resources are allocated to carry out qualitative research. The purpose of our study was to evaluate the availability of qualitative research on women's health screening and assess its influence on screening practice guidelines in the United States, Canada, and the United Kingdom.
Medline, CINHAL, and WEB of Science databases were used to identify the availability of qualitative research conducted in the past 15 years on 3 different women's health screening topics: cervical cancer screening, breast cancer screening, and prenatal first-trimester screening. Key national practice guidelines on women's health screening were selected using the National Guideline Clearinghouse web site. Bibliometric analysis was used to determine the frequency of qualitative references cited in the guidelines.
A total of 272 qualitative research papers on women's health screening was identified: 109 on cervical cancer screening, 104 on breast cancer screening, and 59 on prenatal first-trimester screening. The qualitative studies focused on health care provider perspectives as well as ethical, ethnographic, psychological, and social issues surrounding screening. Fifteen national clinical practice guidelines on women's health screening were identified. A total of 943 references was cited, only 2 of which comprised of qualitative research cited by only 1 clinical practice guideline.
Although there is considerable qualitative research that has been carried out on women's health screening, its incorporation into clinical practice guidelines is minimal. Further exploration of the disconnect between the two is important for enhancing knowledge translation of qualitative research within clinical practice.
开展定性研究需要投入相当多的时间和资源。我们的研究目的是评估女性健康筛查的定性研究的可用性,并评估其对美国、加拿大和英国的筛查实践指南的影响。
使用 Medline、CINHAL 和 WEB of Science 数据库,确定过去 15 年中在 3 个不同的女性健康筛查主题(宫颈癌筛查、乳腺癌筛查和产前早孕期筛查)方面进行的定性研究的可用性。使用国家指南清理中心网站选择关于女性健康筛查的主要国家实践指南。使用文献计量分析确定指南中引用定性参考文献的频率。
共确定了 272 篇关于女性健康筛查的定性研究论文:宫颈癌筛查 109 篇,乳腺癌筛查 104 篇,产前早孕期筛查 59 篇。这些定性研究侧重于医疗保健提供者的观点以及围绕筛查的伦理、民族志、心理和社会问题。确定了 15 项关于女性健康筛查的国家临床实践指南。共引用了 943 个参考文献,其中只有 2 个是定性研究,仅被 1 个临床实践指南引用。
尽管已经对女性健康筛查进行了大量的定性研究,但将其纳入临床实践指南的情况却很少。进一步探讨两者之间的脱节对于提高定性研究在临床实践中的知识转化非常重要。