Department of Research, UNC Health Sciences at MAHEC; Family Medicine and Medical Anthropology, Boston University School of Medicine, 121 Hendersonville Rd., Asheville, NC, 28803, USA.
BMC Womens Health. 2021 Feb 18;21(1):73. doi: 10.1186/s12905-021-01220-9.
Providers face increasing demands to screen for various health issues. Family medicine, primary care, and obstetric providers are encouraged to screen women universally for intimate partner violence, which could be challenging without comprehensive screening tools. The screening expectations and demands motivated providers and staff in south-central Appalachia (U.S.) to engage community members in streamlining women's health screening tools, and integrating intimate partner violence screening questions, through a Human-Centered Design (HCD) process. The objective of this article is to present participants' experiences with and perceptions of the HCD process for developing screening tools for women's health.
This was a qualitative, phenomenological study conducted with community members (n = 4) and providers and staff (n = 7) who participated in the HCD process. Sampling was purposive and opportunistic. An experienced qualitative researcher conducted open-ended, semi-structured interviews with participants. Interviews were transcribed and coded for thematic analysis.
Community members reported that in the HCD sessions they wanted clinicians to understand the importance of timing and trust in health screening. They focused on the importance of taking time to build trust before asking about intimate partner violence; not over-focusing on body weight as this can preclude trust and disclosure of other issues; and understanding the role of historical oppression and racial discrimination in contributing to healthcare mistrust. Providers and staff reported that they recognized the importance of these concerns during the HCD process.
Community members provided critical feedback for designing appropriate tools for screening for women's health. The findings suggest that co-designing screening tools for use in clinical settings can facilitate communication of core values. How, when, and how often screening questions are asked are as important as what is asked-especially as related to intimate partner violence and weight.
提供者面临着越来越多的要求,需要对各种健康问题进行筛查。家庭医学、初级保健和产科提供者被鼓励普遍筛查女性是否存在亲密伴侣暴力问题,如果没有全面的筛查工具,这可能具有挑战性。筛查的期望和要求促使美国中南部阿巴拉契亚地区(美国)的提供者和工作人员通过以人为中心的设计(HCD)流程,让社区成员参与简化女性健康筛查工具,并整合亲密伴侣暴力筛查问题。本文的目的是介绍参与者在使用 HCD 流程开发女性健康筛查工具方面的经验和看法。
这是一项定性、现象学研究,参与者包括(n=4)社区成员和(n=7)参与 HCD 流程的提供者和工作人员。抽样是有目的和机会主义的。一名经验丰富的定性研究人员对参与者进行了开放式、半结构化访谈。访谈内容被转录并进行主题分析。
社区成员报告说,在 HCD 会议上,他们希望临床医生了解健康筛查中时机和信任的重要性。他们专注于在询问亲密伴侣暴力问题之前,需要花时间建立信任;不要过分关注体重,因为这可能会妨碍信任和其他问题的披露;并理解历史上的压迫和种族歧视在导致医疗保健不信任方面的作用。提供者和工作人员报告说,他们在 HCD 过程中认识到这些问题的重要性。
社区成员为设计适合女性健康筛查的工具提供了重要反馈。研究结果表明,共同设计用于临床环境的筛查工具可以促进核心价值观的沟通。如何、何时以及询问多少次筛查问题与询问内容一样重要,特别是与亲密伴侣暴力和体重有关的问题。