Sabornie E J, Marshall K J, Ellis E S
Department of Curriculum and Instruction, North Carolina State University, Raleigh.
Except Child. 1990 Jan;56(4):314-23. doi: 10.1177/001440299005600404.
Sociometric ratings assigned by and to 50 elementary school students with learning disabilities and 50 nonhandicapped elementary school students (in matched pairs) were compared in this study. In addition, traditional sociometric status applied to social impact and social preference was also examined. Results showed that the matched pairs did not differ significantly in assigned status to their peers, but differed significantly in acceptance and rejection received from their shared classmates. Students with learning disabilities and nonhandicapped students differed significantly in social preference, but not in social impact.
本研究比较了50名有学习障碍的小学生和50名无残疾的小学生(配对)相互之间给出的社会测量等级。此外,还考察了适用于社会影响和社会偏好的传统社会测量地位。结果显示,配对学生在给同伴的地位评定上没有显著差异,但在从共同同学那里得到的接纳和拒绝方面有显著差异。有学习障碍的学生和无残疾的学生在社会偏好上有显著差异,但在社会影响上没有差异。