Department of Surgery, New York University Medical Center, 530 First Ave., Suite 10S, New York, NY, 10016, USA,
Surg Endosc. 2014 Jan;28(1):58-64. doi: 10.1007/s00464-013-3161-7. Epub 2013 Sep 6.
It has been demonstrated that hiatal hernia repair (HHR) during laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding (LAGB) decreases the rate of reoperation. However, the technical aspects (location and number of sutures) are not standardized. It is unknown whether such technical details are associated with differing rates of reoperation for band-related problems.
A retrospective analysis was performed from a single institution, including 2,301 patients undergoing LAGB with HHR from July 1, 2007 to December 31, 2011. Independent variables were number and location of sutures. Data collected included demographics, operating room (OR) time, length of stay (LOS), follow-up time, postoperative BMI/%EWL, and rates of readmission/reoperation. Statistical analyses included ANOVA and Chi squared tests. Kaplan-Meier, log-rank, and Cox regression tests were used for follow-up data and reoperation rates, in order to account for differential length of follow-up and confounding variables.
There was no difference in length of follow-up among all groups. The majority of patients had one suture (range 1-6; 55 %). Patients with fewer sutures had shorter OR time (1 suture 45 min vs. 4+ sutures 56 min, p < 0.0001). LOS, 30-day readmission, band-related reoperation, and postop BMI/%EWL were not statistically significant. Anterior suture placement (vs. posterior vs. both) was most common (61 %). OR time was shorter in those with anterior suture (41 min vs. posterior 56 min vs. both 59 min, p < 0.0001). Patients with posterior suture had a longer LOS (84 % 1 day vs. anterior 74 % 1 day vs. both 74 % 1 day, p < 0.0001). There was no difference in 30-day readmission, band-related reoperation, and postoperative BMI/%EWL.
Patients with fewer or anterior sutures have shorter OR times. However, 30-day readmission, band-related reoperation, and postoperative weight loss were unaffected by number or location of suture. The technical aspects of HHR did not appear to be associated with readmission or reoperation, and therefore a standardized approach may not be necessary.
腹腔镜可调胃束带术(LAGB)中修复食管裂孔疝(HHR)可降低再次手术的发生率。然而,技术方面(缝合的位置和数量)尚未标准化。目前尚不清楚这些技术细节是否与与带相关的问题的不同再手术率相关。
对 2007 年 7 月 1 日至 2011 年 12 月 31 日在一家机构接受 LAGB 合并 HHR 的 2301 例患者进行了回顾性分析。自变量为缝合的数量和位置。收集的数据包括人口统计学,手术室(OR)时间,住院时间(LOS),随访时间,术后 BMI/%EWL 和再入院/再手术率。统计分析包括 ANOVA 和卡方检验。Kaplan-Meier,对数秩和 Cox 回归检验用于随访数据和再手术率,以考虑到不同的随访时间和混杂变量。
所有组之间的随访时间均无差异。大多数患者有一条缝线(范围为 1-6;55%)。缝线较少的患者 OR 时间更短(1 缝线 45 分钟 vs. 4+缝线 56 分钟,p <0.0001)。 LOS,30 天再入院,带相关的再手术以及术后 BMI/%EWL 无统计学意义。前缝线放置(与后缝线相比,与两者相比)最为常见(61%)。前缝线的 OR 时间更短(41 分钟 vs. 后缝线 56 分钟 vs. 两者均为 59 分钟,p <0.0001)。后缝线患者的 LOS 较长(84%,1 天 vs. 前缝线 74%,1 天 vs. 两者均为 74%,1 天,p <0.0001)。 30 天再入院,带相关的再手术和术后 BMI/%EWL 无差异。
缝线数量较少或位置靠前的患者的 OR 时间较短。然而,30 天再入院,带相关的再手术和术后体重减轻不受缝线数量或位置的影响。 HHR 的技术方面似乎与再入院或再手术无关,因此不一定需要标准化方法。