Department of Surgery, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE 68198, USA.
Obes Surg. 2012 Oct;22(10):1607-10. doi: 10.1007/s11695-012-0714-0.
The role of laparoscopic hiatal hernia repair (LHHR) at the time of laparoscopic Roux-en-y gastric bypass (LRYGB) is still debatable. This study aims to assess the safety of concomitant LHHR with LRYGB.
This study is a multi-center, retrospective analysis of a large administrative database. The University Health System Consortium (UHC) is a group of 112 academic medical centers and 256 of their affiliated hospitals. The UHC database was queried using International Classification of Diseases-9 codes and main outcome measures were analyzed.
From October 2006 to January 2010, we found 33,717 patients who underwent LRYGB and did not have a hiatal hernia. In this same time period, 644 patients underwent concomitant LRYGB and LHHR, while 1,589 patients underwent LRYGB without repair of their hiatal hernias. On comparison of patients undergoing LRYGB with simultaneous LHHR with those who underwent LRYGB without a diagnosis of HH, there was no significant difference in mortality, morbidity, length of stay (LOS), 30-day readmission, or cost shown. On comparison of patients with HH who underwent LRYGB and simultaneous LHHR with those who had LRYGB without LHHR, no significant difference with regards to all the outcome measures was also shown.
In conclusion, concomitant hiatal hernia repair with LRYGB appears to be safe and feasible. These patients did not have any significant differences in morbidity, mortality, LOS, readmission rate, or cost. Randomized controlled studies should further look into the benefit of hiatal hernia repair in regards to reflux symptoms and weight loss for LRYGB patients.
腹腔镜食管裂孔疝修补术(LHHR)在腹腔镜Roux-en-y 胃旁路术(LRYGB)中的作用仍存在争议。本研究旨在评估腹腔镜 RYGB 时同时进行 LHHR 的安全性。
本研究是一项多中心、回顾性分析大型行政数据库。UHC 是由 112 家学术医疗中心和 256 家附属医院组成的团体。使用国际疾病分类第 9 版(ICD-9)代码对 UHC 数据库进行查询,并分析主要结果指标。
2006 年 10 月至 2010 年 1 月,我们发现 33717 例接受 LRYGB 且无食管裂孔疝的患者。在同一时期,有 644 例患者同时接受 LRYGB 和 LHHR,而 1589 例患者接受 LRYGB 但未修复食管裂孔疝。比较同时接受 LRYGB 和 LHHR 的患者与未诊断为 HH 的患者,在死亡率、发病率、住院时间(LOS)、30 天再入院率或成本方面无显著差异。比较同时接受 LRYGB 和 LHHR 的 HH 患者与未接受 LHHR 的 LRYGB 患者,在所有结果指标方面也没有显著差异。
总之,与 LRYGB 同时进行食管裂孔疝修补术似乎是安全可行的。这些患者在发病率、死亡率、LOS、再入院率或成本方面没有任何显著差异。随机对照研究应进一步探讨食管裂孔疝修复对 LRYGB 患者反流症状和减重的益处。