Suppr超能文献

在接受适应性伺服通气治疗的伴有陈-施呼吸的心力衰竭患者中,使用脉搏传输时间进行血压监测的验证。

Validation of blood pressure monitoring using pulse transit time in heart failure patients with Cheyne-Stokes respiration undergoing adaptive servoventilation therapy.

作者信息

Spießhöfer Jens, Heinrich Jessica, Bitter Thomas, Efken Christina, Lehmann Roman, Eckert Siegfried, Horstkotte Dieter, Oldenburg Olaf

机构信息

Department of Cardiology, Heart and Diabetes Centre North Rhine - Westphalia, University Hospital, Ruhr University Bochum, Georgstrasse 11, 32545, Bad Oeynhausen, Germany.

出版信息

Sleep Breath. 2014 May;18(2):411-21. doi: 10.1007/s11325-013-0895-3. Epub 2013 Sep 24.

Abstract

PURPOSE

Using pulse transit time (PTT) and an ECG appears to be a promising alternative for invasive or noninvasive monitoring of blood pressure (BP). This study assessed the validity of PTT for BP monitoring in clinical practice.

METHODS

Twenty-nine patients with chronic heart failure (HF; 27 male, 70.5 ± 9.9 years) and nocturnal Cheyne-Stokes respiration were noninvasively ventilated for one hour using adaptive servoventilation (ASV) therapy (PaceWave, ResMed). BP was measured using two devices (oscillometrically via Task Force Monitor, CNSystems and PTT via SOMNOscreen, Somnomedics) at least every 7 min for 30 min before, during, and after ASV.

RESULTS

Mean systolic BP was 118.1 ± 14.4 mmHg vs. 115.9 ± 14.1 mmHg for oscillometric method vs PTT, respectively. Corresponding values for diastolic BP were 72.3 ± 10.3 mmHg and 69.4 ± 11.1 mmHg. While clinically comparable, differences between the two methods were statistically significant (p < 0.05). The difference between the two methods showed an increasing trend over time. A total of 18.5 % of PTT-based measurements could not be analyzed. The direction of a change in BP was opposite for PTT vs oscillometry for 17.0 % and 32.8 % of systolic and diastolic BP measurements, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

When monitoring BP in HF patients, overall BP monitoring using PTT is comparable to oscillometry for a period of 2 h (including a 1-h ASV phase). However, PTT shows a tendency to underestimate BP over time and during ASV.

摘要

目的

利用脉搏传输时间(PTT)和心电图似乎是有创或无创血压(BP)监测的一种有前景的替代方法。本研究评估了PTT在临床实践中用于血压监测的有效性。

方法

29例慢性心力衰竭(HF;27例男性,年龄70.5±9.9岁)且有夜间潮式呼吸的患者使用适应性伺服通气(ASV)疗法(PaceWave,瑞思迈公司)进行了1小时的无创通气。在ASV治疗前、治疗期间和治疗后至少每7分钟使用两种设备测量血压(通过Task Force Monitor采用示波法测量,CNSystems公司;通过SOMNOscreen采用PTT测量,Somnomedics公司),共测量30分钟。

结果

示波法测量的平均收缩压为118.1±14.4 mmHg,而PTT测量的为115.9±14.1 mmHg。舒张压的相应值分别为72.3±10.3 mmHg和69.4±11.1 mmHg。虽然在临床上具有可比性,但两种方法之间的差异具有统计学意义(p<0.05)。两种方法之间的差异随时间呈上升趋势。基于PTT的测量中有18.5%无法进行分析。在收缩压和舒张压测量中,分别有17.0%和32.8%的PTT测量与示波法测量的血压变化方向相反。

结论

在监测HF患者的血压时,使用PTT进行的总体血压监测在2小时(包括1小时的ASV阶段)内与示波法相当。然而,PTT显示出随着时间推移和在ASV期间有低估血压的趋势。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验