• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

意大利心脏重症监护病房中急性心肌梗死的管理:用于绩效测量和质量改进的“BLITZ 4 质量”运动。

The management of acute myocardial infarction in the cardiological intensive care units in Italy: the 'BLITZ 4 Qualità' campaign for performance measurement and quality improvement.

机构信息

Ospedale Cà Foncello, Treviso, Italy.

出版信息

Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care. 2012 Jun;1(2):143-52. doi: 10.1177/2048872612450520.

DOI:10.1177/2048872612450520
PMID:24062902
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3760526/
Abstract

AIM

To assess and promote compliance of Italian cardiological intensive care units (CCUs) with evidence-based guidelines for the management of acute myocardial infarction (MI).

METHODS AND RESULTS

The process of diagnosis and treatment of MI was prospectively evaluated in 163 CCUs by use of 30 indicators during two enrolment phases, each followed by a feedback of both local and general performance. Overall, 5854 patients with ST-segment elevation MI (STEMI) and 5852 with non-ST-segment elevation MI (NSTEMI) were consecutively enrolled. The target for each indicator was defined as compliance with the relevant recommendations in ≥90% of suitable patients and it was met for nine (30%) and 10 (33.3%) indicators in the first and second phases, respectively. Regardless of target, a significant improvement in compliance was observed in the second phase in 10 out of 30 indicators (33.3%). Use of pre-hospital ECG, expedite delivery of reperfusion therapy, dosage of antithrombotic drugs, and non-pharmacological implementation of secondary prevention were often off target. Similar in-hospital mortality was observed in phases I and II, both in patients with STEMI (4.0 vs. 4.2%, p=0.79) and NSTEMI (1.8 vs. 2.4%, p=0.11). Overall, 30-day mortality were 5.7% for patients with STEMI and 3.4% with NSTEMI.

CONCLUSIONS

Performance indicators can accurately weigh the whole process of diagnosis and treatment of patients with MI and monitor the improvements in the quality of care. In our large population of consecutive patients, satisfactory 30-day outcomes were observed despite suboptimal adherence to guidelines for some indicators of recognised prognostic relevance.

摘要

目的

评估和促进意大利心脏重症监护病房(CCU)对急性心肌梗死(MI)管理循证指南的遵循情况。

方法和结果

通过使用 30 项指标,在两个入组阶段前瞻性评估 163 个 CCU 中 MI 的诊断和治疗过程,每个阶段之后都会反馈当地和总体表现。共连续入组 5854 例 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死(STEMI)和 5852 例非 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死(NSTEMI)患者。每个指标的目标设定为在≥90%合适患者中符合相关建议,第一和第二阶段分别有 9(30%)和 10(33.3%)个指标达到目标。无论目标如何,在第二阶段,30 个指标中有 10 个(33.3%)的依从性显著提高。院前心电图的使用、尽快实施再灌注治疗、抗血栓药物剂量以及二级预防的非药物实施通常不符合目标。在 STEMI(4.0%比 4.2%,p=0.79)和 NSTEMI(1.8%比 2.4%,p=0.11)患者中,第一和第二阶段的院内死亡率相似。STEMI 患者的总体 30 天死亡率为 5.7%,NSTEMI 患者为 3.4%。

结论

绩效指标可以准确衡量 MI 患者诊断和治疗的整个过程,并监测护理质量的改进。在我们连续入组的大量患者中,尽管某些具有公认预后相关性的指标的指南依从性不理想,但观察到令人满意的 30 天结局。

相似文献

1
The management of acute myocardial infarction in the cardiological intensive care units in Italy: the 'BLITZ 4 Qualità' campaign for performance measurement and quality improvement.意大利心脏重症监护病房中急性心肌梗死的管理:用于绩效测量和质量改进的“BLITZ 4 质量”运动。
Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care. 2012 Jun;1(2):143-52. doi: 10.1177/2048872612450520.
2
Epidemiology of acute myocardial infarction in the Italian CCU network: the BLITZ study.意大利冠心病监护病房网络中急性心肌梗死的流行病学:闪电研究
Eur Heart J. 2003 Sep;24(18):1616-29. doi: 10.1016/s0195-668x(03)00278-1.
3
Long-term prognosis of first myocardial infarction according to the electrocardiographic pattern (ST elevation myocardial infarction, non-ST elevation myocardial infarction and non-classified myocardial infarction) and revascularization procedures.根据心电图模式(ST 段抬高型心肌梗死、非 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死和未分类型心肌梗死)和血运重建术对首次心肌梗死的长期预后进行评估。
Am J Cardiol. 2011 Oct 15;108(8):1061-7. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2011.06.003. Epub 2011 Jul 24.
4
Quality of care by classification of myocardial infarction: treatment patterns for ST-segment elevation vs non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction.按心肌梗死分类的医疗质量:ST 段抬高型与非 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死的治疗模式
Arch Intern Med. 2005 Jul 25;165(14):1630-6. doi: 10.1001/archinte.165.14.1630.
5
Acute Myocardial Infarction: Changes in Patient Characteristics, Management, and 6-Month Outcomes Over a Period of 20 Years in the FAST-MI Program (French Registry of Acute ST-Elevation or Non-ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction) 1995 to 2015.急性心肌梗死:FAST-MI 项目(1995 年至 2015 年法国急性 ST 段抬高或非 ST 段抬高心肌梗死注册研究)20 年来患者特征、治疗方法的变化和 6 个月预后
Circulation. 2017 Nov 14;136(20):1908-1919. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.117.030798. Epub 2017 Aug 27.
6
Management and mortality in patients with non-ST-segment elevation vs. ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. Data from the Malopolska Registry of Acute Coronary Syndromes.非ST段抬高型与ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者的管理与死亡率。来自小波兰急性冠脉综合征登记处的数据。
Kardiol Pol. 2009 Feb;67(2):115-20; discussion 121-2.
7
Contemporary NSTEMI management: the role of the hospitalist.当代非ST段抬高型心肌梗死的管理:住院医师的作用。
Hosp Pract (1995). 2020 Feb;48(1):1-11. doi: 10.1080/21548331.2020.1701329. Epub 2020 Feb 20.
8
Implications of prior myocardial infarction for patients presenting with an acute myocardial infarction.对于急性心肌梗死患者,既往心肌梗死的影响。
Am Heart J. 2014 Jun;167(6):840-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2014.03.009. Epub 2014 Apr 3.
9
Comparison of the ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction (STEMI) vs. NSTEMI and Occlusion MI (OMI) vs. NOMI Paradigms of Acute MI.急性心肌梗死(AMI)中 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死(STEMI)与非 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死(NSTEMI)以及闭塞性心肌梗死(OMI)与非闭塞性心肌梗死(NOMI)的比较。
J Emerg Med. 2021 Mar;60(3):273-284. doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2020.10.026. Epub 2020 Dec 9.
10
Does heart rate variability correlate with long-term prognosis in myocardial infarction patients treated by early revascularization?早期血运重建治疗的心肌梗死患者的心率变异性与长期预后相关吗?
World J Cardiol. 2017 Jan 26;9(1):27-38. doi: 10.4330/wjc.v9.i1.27.

引用本文的文献

1
Hyperuricemia in Cardiac Rehabilitation Patients: Prevalence and Association with Functional Improvement and Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction.心脏康复患者的高尿酸血症:患病率及与功能改善和左心室射血分数的关系。
High Blood Press Cardiovasc Prev. 2024 Sep;31(5):461-471. doi: 10.1007/s40292-024-00665-x. Epub 2024 Aug 7.
2
BLITZ-HF: a nationwide initiative to evaluate and improve adherence to acute and chronic heart failure guidelines.BLITZ-HF:一项全国性的倡议,旨在评估和改善急性和慢性心力衰竭指南的依从性。
Eur J Heart Fail. 2022 Nov;24(11):2078-2089. doi: 10.1002/ejhf.2605. Epub 2022 Jul 21.
3
Alexithymia is a determinant of early death in the long-term course of post-myocardial infarction.述情障碍是心肌梗死后长期病程中早期死亡的一个决定因素。
J Public Health Res. 2022 Mar 16;11(2):2803. doi: 10.4081/jphr.2022.2803.
4
Clinical governance programme in patients with acute coronary syndrome: design and methodology of a quality improvement initiative.急性冠状动脉综合征患者的临床治理计划:一项质量改进计划的设计与方法。
Open Heart. 2020 Dec;7(2). doi: 10.1136/openhrt-2020-001415.
5
Complications during hospitalization and at 30 days in the intensive cardiac care unit for patients with ST-elevation versus non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome: A protocol for systematic review and meta analysis.ST段抬高型与非ST段抬高型急性冠状动脉综合征患者在住院期间及重症心脏监护病房30天内的并发症:一项系统评价和荟萃分析方案
Medicine (Baltimore). 2020 Jun 12;99(24):e20655. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000020655.
6
Consensus Document ANMCO/ANCE/ARCA/GICR-IACPR/GISE/SICOA: Long-term Antiplatelet Therapy in Patients with Coronary Artery Disease.ANMCO/ANCE/ARCA/GICR - IACPR/GISE/SICOA共识文件:冠状动脉疾病患者的长期抗血小板治疗
Eur Heart J Suppl. 2018 May;20(Suppl F):F1-F74. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/suy019. Epub 2018 May 31.
7
Contemporary Trends and Age-Specific Sex Differences in Management and Outcome for Patients With ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction.ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者管理及预后的当代趋势与特定年龄的性别差异
J Am Heart Assoc. 2016 Nov 23;5(12):e004202. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.116.004202.
8
Knowledge translation lessons from an audit of Aboriginal Australians with acute coronary syndrome presenting to a regional hospital.对一家地区医院收治的患有急性冠状动脉综合征的澳大利亚原住民进行审计所获得的知识转化经验教训。
SAGE Open Med. 2016 Jul 28;4:2050312116661114. doi: 10.1177/2050312116661114. eCollection 2016.
9
Adherence to Cardiac Practice Guidelines in the Management of Non-ST-Elevation Acute Coronary Syndromes: A Systematic Literature Review.非ST段抬高型急性冠状动脉综合征管理中对心脏实践指南的遵循:一项系统文献综述
Curr Cardiol Rev. 2017;13(1):3-27. doi: 10.2174/1573403x12666160504100025.
10
A decade of changes in clinical characteristics and management of elderly patients with non-ST elevation myocardial infarction admitted in Italian cardiac care units.意大利心脏监护病房收治的老年非ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者临床特征及治疗的十年变化
Open Heart. 2014 Dec 13;1(1):e000148. doi: 10.1136/openhrt-2014-000148. eCollection 2014.

本文引用的文献

1
2011 ACCF/AHA focused update incorporated into the ACC/AHA 2007 Guidelines for the Management of Patients with Unstable Angina/Non-ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines developed in collaboration with the American Academy of Family Physicians, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, and the Society of Thoracic Surgeons.2011年美国心脏病学会基金会/美国心脏协会重点更新内容纳入《美国心脏病学会/美国心脏协会2007年不稳定型心绞痛/非ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者管理指南》:美国心脏病学会基金会/美国心脏协会实践指南工作组与美国家庭医师学会、心血管造影和介入学会以及胸外科医师学会合作制定的报告。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011 May 10;57(19):e215-367. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2011.02.011.
2
ACCF/AHA new insights into the methodology of performance measurement: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on performance measures.美国心脏病学会基金会/美国心脏协会绩效评估方法新见解:美国心脏病学会基金会/美国心脏协会绩效评估特别工作组报告
Circulation. 2010 Nov 16;122(20):2091-106. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0b013e3181f7d78c. Epub 2010 Nov 8.
3
Reperfusion strategy in Europe: temporal trends in performance measures for reperfusion therapy in ST-elevation myocardial infarction.欧洲再灌注策略:ST 段抬高型心肌梗死再灌注治疗的绩效指标的时间趋势。
Eur Heart J. 2010 Nov;31(21):2614-24. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehq305. Epub 2010 Aug 30.
4
Epidemiology and patterns of care of patients admitted to Italian Intensive Cardiac Care units: the BLITZ-3 registry.意大利重症心脏监护病房患者入院的流行病学和治疗模式:BLITZ-3 注册研究。
J Cardiovasc Med (Hagerstown). 2010 Jun;11(6):450-61. doi: 10.2459/JCM.0b013e328335233e.
5
2009 Focused Updates: ACC/AHA Guidelines for the Management of Patients With ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction (updating the 2004 Guideline and 2007 Focused Update) and ACC/AHA/SCAI Guidelines on Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (updating the 2005 Guideline and 2007 Focused Update): a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines.2009聚焦更新:美国心脏病学会/美国心脏协会ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者管理指南(更新2004年指南和2007年聚焦更新)以及美国心脏病学会/美国心脏协会/心血管造影和介入学会经皮冠状动脉介入治疗指南(更新2005年指南和2007年聚焦更新):美国心脏病学基金会/美国心脏协会实践指南工作组报告
Circulation. 2009 Dec 1;120(22):2271-306. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.109.192663. Epub 2009 Nov 18.
6
Temporal trends in the use of invasive cardiac procedures for non-ST segment elevation acute coronary syndromes according to initial risk stratification.根据初始风险分层,非ST段抬高型急性冠状动脉综合征患者侵入性心脏手术使用情况的时间趋势。
Can J Cardiol. 2009 Nov;25(11):e370-6. doi: 10.1016/s0828-282x(09)70163-1.
7
The dissociation between door-to-balloon time improvement and improvements in other acute myocardial infarction care processes and patient outcomes.门球时间改善与其他急性心肌梗死护理流程及患者预后改善之间的脱节。
Arch Intern Med. 2009 Aug 10;169(15):1411-9. doi: 10.1001/archinternmed.2009.223.
8
Reassessment of clinical practice guidelines: go gently into that good night.临床实践指南的重新评估:缓缓步入那良夜。
JAMA. 2009 Feb 25;301(8):868-9. doi: 10.1001/jama.2009.225.
9
ACC/AHA classification of care metrics: performance measures and quality metrics: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Performance Measures.美国心脏病学会/美国心脏协会护理指标分类:绩效指标与质量指标:美国心脏病学会/美国心脏协会绩效指标特别工作组报告
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2008 Dec 9;52(24):2113-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2008.10.014.
10
ACC/AHA 2008 performance measures for adults with ST-elevation and non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Performance Measures (Writing Committee to Develop Performance Measures for ST-Elevation and Non-ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction) Developed in Collaboration With the American Academy of Family Physicians and American College of Emergency Physicians Endorsed by the American Association of Cardiovascular and Pulmonary Rehabilitation, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, and Society of Hospital Medicine.美国心脏病学会/美国心脏协会2008年ST段抬高型和非ST段抬高型心肌梗死成人患者性能指标:美国心脏病学会/美国心脏协会性能指标特别工作组(制定ST段抬高型和非ST段抬高型心肌梗死性能指标写作委员会)报告,与美国家庭医师学会和美国急诊医师学会合作制定,得到美国心血管和肺康复协会、心血管造影和介入学会以及医院医学学会认可。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2008 Dec 9;52(24):2046-99. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2008.10.012.