• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

急性冠状动脉综合征患者的临床治理计划:一项质量改进计划的设计与方法。

Clinical governance programme in patients with acute coronary syndrome: design and methodology of a quality improvement initiative.

机构信息

Cardiology, University of Pavia, Pavia, Lombardia, Italy

Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, Pavia, Lombardia, Italy.

出版信息

Open Heart. 2020 Dec;7(2). doi: 10.1136/openhrt-2020-001415.

DOI:10.1136/openhrt-2020-001415
PMID:33372102
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7768950/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Despite the availability of diverse evidence-based diagnostic and treatment options, many patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) still fail to receive effective, safe and timely diagnoses and therapies. The Association of Acute CardioVascular Care of the European Society of Cardiology has proposed and retrospectively validated a set of ACS-specific quality indicators. Combining these indicators with the principles of clinical governance-a holistic, patient-centred approach intended to promote continuous quality improvement-we designed the clinical governance programme in patients with ACS.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

This is a multicentre quality improvement initiative exploring multiple dimensions of care, including diagnosis, therapy, patient satisfaction, centre organisation and efficiency in all comers patients with ACS.The study will enrol ≈ 5000 patients prospectively (ie, at the time of the first objective qualifying ACS criterion) with a 1-year follow-up. Consecutive inclusion will be promoted by a simplified informed consent process and quantified by the concordance with corresponding hospital administrative records using diagnosis-related group codes of ACS.Coprimary outcome measures are (1) timely reperfusion in patients with ST-elevation ACS and (2) optimal medical therapy at discharge in patients with confirmed acute myocardial infarction. Secondary outcomes broadly include multiple indicators of the process of care. Clinical endpoints (ie, death, myocardial infarction, stroke and bleeding) will be adjudicated by a clinical event committee according to predefined criteria.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

The study has been approved by local ethics committee of all study sites. As a quality improvement initiative and to promote consecutive inclusion of the population of interest, a written informed consent will be requested only to patients who are discharged alive. Dissemination will be actively promoted by (1) the registration site (ClinicalTrials.Gov ID NCT04255537), (2) collaborations with investigators through open data access and sharing.

摘要

简介

尽管有多种基于证据的诊断和治疗选择,但许多急性冠状动脉综合征(ACS)患者仍然无法获得有效、安全和及时的诊断和治疗。欧洲心脏病学会急性心血管护理协会提出并回顾性验证了一组特定于 ACS 的质量指标。我们将这些指标与临床治理原则相结合——一种旨在促进持续质量改进的整体、以患者为中心的方法——为 ACS 患者设计了临床治理计划。

方法和分析

这是一项多中心质量改进计划,探索了包括诊断、治疗、患者满意度、中心组织和效率在内的多个护理维度,适用于所有 ACS 患者。该研究将前瞻性纳入约 5000 名患者(即在首次符合 ACS 标准的客观标准时),并进行为期 1 年的随访。通过简化的知情同意程序促进连续纳入,并使用 ACS 的诊断相关组代码对相应的医院行政记录进行量化。主要结局指标是(1)ST 段抬高型 ACS 患者的及时再灌注和(2)确诊急性心肌梗死患者的出院时最佳药物治疗。次要结局广泛包括护理过程的多个指标。临床终点(即死亡、心肌梗死、卒中和出血)将根据预设标准由临床事件委员会进行裁决。

伦理和传播

该研究已获得所有研究地点的当地伦理委员会的批准。作为一项质量改进计划,并为了促进有兴趣的人群的连续纳入,仅要求存活出院的患者提供书面知情同意。将通过以下方式积极传播:(1)注册网站(ClinicalTrials.Gov ID NCT04255537);(2)通过开放数据访问和共享与研究人员合作。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3eed/7768950/27740e556a8d/openhrt-2020-001415f02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3eed/7768950/ed45ea989e6d/openhrt-2020-001415f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3eed/7768950/27740e556a8d/openhrt-2020-001415f02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3eed/7768950/ed45ea989e6d/openhrt-2020-001415f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3eed/7768950/27740e556a8d/openhrt-2020-001415f02.jpg

相似文献

1
Clinical governance programme in patients with acute coronary syndrome: design and methodology of a quality improvement initiative.急性冠状动脉综合征患者的临床治理计划:一项质量改进计划的设计与方法。
Open Heart. 2020 Dec;7(2). doi: 10.1136/openhrt-2020-001415.
2
Clinical governance of patients with acute coronary syndromes.急性冠状动脉综合征患者的临床治理。
Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care. 2022 Nov 30;11(11):797-805. doi: 10.1093/ehjacc/zuac106.
3
Individual quality improvement in acute coronary syndromes: a performance improvement initiative.急性冠状动脉综合征的个体质量改进:一项绩效改进举措。
Crit Pathw Cardiol. 2009 Mar;8(1):43-8. doi: 10.1097/HPC.0b013e3181980f75.
4
Approach to non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome in the emergency department: risk stratification and treatment strategies.急诊科非ST段抬高型急性冠状动脉综合征的处理:风险分层与治疗策略
Hosp Pract (1995). 2010 Apr;38(2):40-9.
5
Sex Differences in In-Hospital Management and Outcomes of Patients With Acute Coronary Syndrome.急性冠状动脉综合征患者住院期间管理和结局的性别差异。
Circulation. 2019 Apr 9;139(15):1776-1785. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.118.037655.
6
Smoking and Provision of Smoking Cessation Interventions among Inpatients with Acute Coronary Syndrome in China: Findings from the Improving Care for Cardiovascular Disease in China-Acute Coronary Syndrome Project.中国急性冠状动脉综合征住院患者中的吸烟状况和戒烟干预措施:来自改善中国心血管疾病管理-急性冠状动脉综合征项目的研究结果。
Glob Heart. 2020 Oct 23;15(1):72. doi: 10.5334/gh.784.
7
Improving the care of patients with non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes in the emergency department: the CRUSADE initiative.改善急诊科非ST段抬高型急性冠脉综合征患者的护理:CRUSADE倡议
Acad Emerg Med. 2002 Nov;9(11):1146-55. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2002.tb01569.x.
8
Rationale and design of the Improving Care for Cardiovascular Disease in China (CCC) project: A national effort to prompt quality enhancement for acute coronary syndrome.中国改善心血管疾病护理(CCC)项目的基本原理与设计:一项旨在促进急性冠状动脉综合征质量提升的全国性行动。
Am Heart J. 2016 Sep;179:107-15. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2016.06.005. Epub 2016 Jun 18.
9
National Heart Foundation of Australia and Cardiac Society of Australia and New Zealand: Australian clinical guidelines for the management of acute coronary syndromes 2016.澳大利亚国家心脏基金会和澳大利亚及新西兰心脏学会:2016 年澳大利亚急性冠状动脉综合征管理临床指南。
Med J Aust. 2016 Aug 1;205(3):128-33. doi: 10.5694/mja16.00368.
10
Optimal medical therapy at discharge in patients with acute coronary syndromes: temporal changes, characteristics, and 1-year outcome.急性冠状动脉综合征患者出院时的最佳药物治疗:时间变化、特征及1年结局
Am Heart J. 2007 Dec;154(6):1108-15. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2007.07.040. Epub 2007 Sep 14.

引用本文的文献

1
Clinical governance of patients with acute coronary syndromes.急性冠状动脉综合征患者的临床治理。
Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care. 2022 Nov 30;11(11):797-805. doi: 10.1093/ehjacc/zuac106.
2
Barriers associated with emergency medical service activation in patients with ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes.ST 段抬高型急性冠状动脉综合征患者启动急救医疗服务的障碍。
Intern Emerg Med. 2022 Jun;17(4):1165-1174. doi: 10.1007/s11739-021-02894-7. Epub 2021 Nov 26.

本文引用的文献

1
Assessment of quality indicators for acute myocardial infarction management in 28 countries and use of composite quality indicators for benchmarking.评估 28 个国家急性心肌梗死管理的质量指标,并使用综合质量指标进行基准比较。
Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care. 2020 Dec;9(8):911-922. doi: 10.1177/2048872620911853. Epub 2020 Mar 11.
2
EuroHeart: European Unified Registries On Heart Care Evaluation and Randomized Trials.欧洲心脏计划:欧洲心脏护理评估与随机试验统一注册库。
Eur Heart J. 2019 Sep 1;40(33):2745-2749. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehz599.
3
Radial versus femoral access and bivalirudin versus unfractionated heparin in invasively managed patients with acute coronary syndrome (MATRIX): final 1-year results of a multicentre, randomised controlled trial.
经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的急性冠状动脉综合征患者中桡动脉入路与股动脉入路和比伐卢定与普通肝素的比较(MATRIX):一项多中心、随机对照试验的最终 1 年结果。
Lancet. 2018 Sep 8;392(10150):835-848. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)31714-8. Epub 2018 Aug 25.
4
2017 Cardiovascular and Stroke Endpoint Definitions for Clinical Trials.2017 年临床试验心血管和卒中终点定义。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018 Mar 6;71(9):1021-1034. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2017.12.048.
5
Performance of hospitals according to the ESC ACCA quality indicators and 30-day mortality for acute myocardial infarction: national cohort study using the United Kingdom Myocardial Ischaemia National Audit Project (MINAP) register.根据欧洲心脏病学会急性冠状动脉综合征质量指标评估医院表现及急性心肌梗死的30天死亡率:使用英国心肌缺血国家审计项目(MINAP)登记册的全国队列研究
Eur Heart J. 2017 Apr 1;38(13):974-982. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehx008.
6
Rethinking clinical governance: healthcare professionals' views: a Delphi study.重新思考临床治理:医疗保健专业人员的观点:一项德尔菲研究。
BMJ Open. 2017 Jan 12;7(1):e012591. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-012591.
7
Quality indicators for acute myocardial infarction: A position paper of the Acute Cardiovascular Care Association.急性心肌梗死的质量指标:急性心血管护理协会立场文件
Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care. 2017 Feb;6(1):34-59. doi: 10.1177/2048872616643053. Epub 2016 Sep 20.
8
Predicting In-Hospital Mortality in Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction.预测急性心肌梗死患者的住院死亡率。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2016 Aug 9;68(6):626-635. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2016.05.049.
9
Data Sharing.数据共享。
N Engl J Med. 2016 Jan 21;374(3):276-7. doi: 10.1056/NEJMe1516564.
10
Novel Trial Designs: Lessons Learned from Thrombus Aspiration During ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction in Scandinavia (TASTE) Trial.新型试验设计:从斯堪的纳维亚ST段抬高型心肌梗死血栓抽吸试验(TASTE试验)中吸取的经验教训
Curr Cardiol Rep. 2016 Jan;18(1):11. doi: 10.1007/s11886-015-0677-6.