Suppr超能文献

水杨酸贴剂与“常规”手术刀削除鸡眼的疗效比较:一项随机对照试验。

The effectiveness of salicylic acid plasters compared with 'usual' scalpel debridement of corns: a randomised controlled trial.

机构信息

Podiatry Services, Jordanthorpe Health Centre, 1 Dyche Close, Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Sheffield S8 8DJ, England.

出版信息

J Foot Ankle Res. 2013 Sep 24;6(1):40. doi: 10.1186/1757-1146-6-40.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Corns are a common foot problem and surveys have indicated that between 14-48% of people suffer from them. Many of these will seek podiatry treatment, however there is little evidence to indicate which current treatments provide long term resolution. This study compared 'usual' treatment (enucleation with a scalpel) with the application of 40% salicylic acid plasters to corns to investigate which is the most effective in terms of clinical, economic and patient-centred outcomes.

METHODS

A parallel-group randomised controlled trial was carried out in two centres where adults who presented with one or more corns and who met the inclusion criteria were allocated to either 'usual' scalpel debridement or corn plaster treatment. All participants had measurements of corn size, pain using a 100 mm visual analogue scale (VAS) and health-related quality of life (EQ-5D) measures by an independent podiatrist, blind to treatment allocation at baseline, 3, 6, 9 and 12 months.

RESULTS

202 participants were randomised to receive scalpel debridement or corn plaster treatment (101 in each group). At 3 months 34% (32/95) of corns had completely resolved in the corn plaster group compared with 21% (20/94) in the scalpel group (p = 0.044), and 83% (79/95) had reduced in size in the corn plaster group compared with 56% (53/94) in the scalpel group (p < 0.001). At 12 months, time to corn recurrence was longer in the corn plaster group (p < 0.001). Pain from the corns was significantly lower in the corn plaster group at 3 months (p < 0.001) and EQ-5D scores changed (improved), from baseline, by 0.09 (SD ±0.31) and 0.01 (SD ±0.25) points in the corn plaster and scalpel groups respectively (p = 0.056). By month 12, EQ-5D scores had changed by 0.12 and -0.05 in the corn plaster and scalpel groups respectively (p = 0.005). The EQ-5D, VAS scores and the four domains of the Foot Disability Scale were similar in both groups at 3 and 12 months. The economic analysis indicated that corn plasters were a cost effective intervention.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of corn plasters was associated with a higher proportion of resolved corns, a prolonged time to corn recurrence, less pain and reduced corn size over the first 6 months in comparison with 'usual' scalpel treatment and this intervention was cost effective. Used under supervision of a podiatrist on appropriate patients, corn plasters offer an effective alternative to scalpel debridement.

摘要

背景

鸡眼是一种常见的足部问题,调查显示,14%-48%的人患有鸡眼。许多人会寻求足病治疗,但目前的治疗方法中,哪种方法能长期解决问题,证据有限。本研究比较了“常规”治疗(手术刀切除)与应用 40%水杨酸贴膏治疗鸡眼,以调查哪种方法在临床、经济和以患者为中心的结局方面最有效。

方法

在两个中心进行了一项平行组随机对照试验,纳入符合纳入标准的患有一个或多个鸡眼并就诊的成年人,将其随机分配至“常规”手术刀削除或鸡眼贴膏治疗。所有参与者均由独立的足病医生在基线、3、6、9 和 12 个月时进行鸡眼大小、疼痛(使用 100mm 视觉模拟量表[VAS])和健康相关生活质量(EQ-5D)的测量,测量时足病医生对治疗分配情况不知情。

结果

202 名参与者被随机分配至接受手术刀削除或鸡眼贴膏治疗(每组 101 人)。3 个月时,鸡眼贴膏组中 34%(32/95)的鸡眼完全消退,而手术刀组中为 21%(20/94)(p=0.044);鸡眼贴膏组中 83%(79/95)的鸡眼尺寸缩小,而手术刀组中为 56%(53/94)(p<0.001)。12 个月时,鸡眼贴膏组的鸡眼复发时间更长(p<0.001)。3 个月时,鸡眼贴膏组的鸡眼疼痛明显低于手术刀组(p<0.001),且 EQ-5D 评分从基线开始分别改善了 0.09(标准差±0.31)和 0.01(标准差±0.25)分(p=0.056)。12 个月时,鸡眼贴膏组和手术刀组的 EQ-5D 评分分别改善了 0.12 和-0.05(p=0.005)。在 3 和 12 个月时,两组的 EQ-5D、VAS 评分和足部残疾量表的四个维度均相似。经济分析表明,与“常规”手术刀削除相比,鸡眼贴膏的干预是具有成本效益的。

结论

与“常规”手术刀削除相比,在最初 6 个月内,鸡眼贴膏的鸡眼完全消退比例更高、鸡眼复发时间更长、疼痛减轻、鸡眼尺寸更小,并且具有成本效益。在足病医生的监督下,在合适的患者中使用鸡眼贴膏,为手术刀削除提供了一种有效的替代方法。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/793a/3856524/dec3700d0372/1757-1146-6-40-1.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验