• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

绝大多数患者更喜欢住院留观而非急诊科留观。

Patients overwhelmingly prefer inpatient boarding to emergency department boarding.

作者信息

Viccellio Peter, Zito Joseph A, Sayage Valerie, Chohan Jasmine, Garra Gregory, Santora Carolyn, Singer Adam J

机构信息

Department of Emergency Medicine, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, New York.

出版信息

J Emerg Med. 2013 Dec;45(6):942-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2013.07.018. Epub 2013 Sep 21.

DOI:10.1016/j.jemermed.2013.07.018
PMID:24063879
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Boarding of admitted patients in the emergency department (ED) is a major cause of crowding. One alternative to boarding in the ED, a full-capacity protocol where boarded patients are redeployed to inpatient units, can reduce crowding and improve overall flow.

OBJECTIVE

Our aim was to compare patient satisfaction with boarding in the ED vs. inpatient hallways.

METHODS

We performed a structured telephone survey regarding patient experiences and preferences for boarding among admitted ED patients who experienced boarding in the ED hallway and then were subsequently transferred to inpatient hallways. Demographic and clinical characteristics, as well as patient preferences, including items related to patient comfort and safety using a 5-point scale, were recorded and descriptive statistics were used to summarize the data.

RESULTS

Of 110 patients contacted, 105 consented to participate. Mean age was 57 ± 16 years and 52% were female. All patients were initially boarded in the ED in a hallway before their transfer to an inpatient hallway bed. The overall preferred location after admission was the inpatient hallway in 85% (95% confidence interval 75-90) of respondents. In comparing ED vs. inpatient hallway boarding, the following percentages of respondents preferred inpatient boarding with regard to the following 8 items: rest, 85%; safety, 83%; confidentiality, 82%; treatment, 78%; comfort, 79%; quiet, 84%; staff availability, 84%; and privacy, 84%. For no item was there a preference for boarding in the ED.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients overwhelmingly preferred the inpatient hallway rather than the ED hallway when admitted to the hospital.

摘要

背景

急诊科收治患者滞留是导致拥挤的主要原因。急诊科滞留的一种替代方案是满负荷运转协议,即将滞留患者重新安置到住院病房,这可以减少拥挤并改善整体流程。

目的

我们的目的是比较患者对急诊科滞留与住院病房走廊滞留的满意度。

方法

我们对在急诊科走廊滞留并随后被转移到住院病房走廊的已收治急诊科患者进行了一项关于患者经历和滞留偏好的结构化电话调查。记录了人口统计学和临床特征以及患者偏好,包括使用5分制与患者舒适度和安全性相关的项目,并使用描述性统计来汇总数据。

结果

在联系的110名患者中,105名同意参与。平均年龄为57±16岁,52%为女性。所有患者在转移到住院病房走廊床位之前最初都在急诊科走廊滞留。85%(95%置信区间75-90)的受访者表示入院后总体更喜欢的地点是住院病房走廊。在比较急诊科与住院病房走廊滞留时,以下百分比的受访者在以下8个项目上更喜欢住院病房滞留:休息,85%;安全,83%;隐私,82%;治疗,78%;舒适度,79%;安静,84%;工作人员可及性,84%;隐私,84%。没有一个项目显示患者更喜欢在急诊科滞留。

结论

患者入院时绝大多数更喜欢住院病房走廊而非急诊科走廊。

相似文献

1
Patients overwhelmingly prefer inpatient boarding to emergency department boarding.绝大多数患者更喜欢住院留观而非急诊科留观。
J Emerg Med. 2013 Dec;45(6):942-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2013.07.018. Epub 2013 Sep 21.
2
Emergency department patient preferences for boarding locations when hospitals are at full capacity.医院满负荷运转时急诊科患者对候诊地点的偏好。
Ann Emerg Med. 2008 Jan;51(1):9-12, 12.e1-3. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2007.03.016. Epub 2007 May 9.
3
The association between transfer of emergency department boarders to inpatient hallways and mortality: a 4-year experience.急诊科留观患者转至住院病房走廊与死亡率之间的关联:一项为期4年的经验研究。
Ann Emerg Med. 2009 Oct;54(4):487-91. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2009.03.005. Epub 2009 Apr 3.
4
Parental preferences for boarding locations when a children's hospital exceeds capacity.当儿童医院超出容量时,家长对住院地点的偏好。
Ann Emerg Med. 2009 Jun;53(6):762-6. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2008.12.003. Epub 2009 Feb 1.
5
Patients prefer boarding in inpatient hallways: correlation with the national emergency department overcrowding score.患者更喜欢在住院部走廊候诊:与国家急诊科拥挤度评分的相关性
Emerg Med Int. 2011;2011:840459. doi: 10.1155/2011/840459. Epub 2011 Dec 26.
6
Emergency department overcrowding and inpatient boarding: a statewide glimpse in time.急诊部门拥挤和住院病人候床:全州范围内的及时一瞥。
Acad Emerg Med. 2011 Dec;18(12):1386-91. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2011.01209.x.
7
The relationship between inpatient discharge timing and emergency department boarding.住院患者出院时间与急诊科滞留之间的关系。
J Emerg Med. 2012 Feb;42(2):186-96. doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2010.06.028. Epub 2010 Oct 2.
8
The opportunity loss of boarding admitted patients in the emergency department.急诊科收治住院患者的机会损失。
Acad Emerg Med. 2007 Apr;14(4):332-7. doi: 10.1197/j.aem.2006.11.011. Epub 2007 Mar 1.
9
The effect of emergency department crowding on patient satisfaction for admitted patients.急诊科拥挤对住院患者满意度的影响。
Acad Emerg Med. 2008 Sep;15(9):825-31. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2008.00200.x.
10
Comparison between emergency department and inpatient nurses' perceptions of boarding of admitted patients.急诊部与住院部护士对收治入院患者候床感知的比较。
West J Emerg Med. 2013 Mar;14(2):90-5. doi: 10.5811/westjem.2012.12.12830.

引用本文的文献

1
The potential for patient-reported data and narratives to improve quality during emergency department boarding.患者报告的数据和叙述在急诊科滞留期间改善医疗质量的潜力。
Health Aff Sch. 2025 Jul 7;3(7):qxaf138. doi: 10.1093/haschl/qxaf138. eCollection 2025 Jul.
2
Building a public-private partnership to confront the emergency department boarding crisis.建立公私合作伙伴关系以应对急诊科滞留危机。
Health Aff Sch. 2025 Apr 2;3(4):qxaf014. doi: 10.1093/haschl/qxaf014. eCollection 2025 Apr.
3
Modulating patient output: rethinking the role of EM in the healthcare system.
调节患者产出:重新思考急诊医学在医疗体系中的作用
Intern Emerg Med. 2025 Jan;20(1):215-220. doi: 10.1007/s11739-024-03774-6. Epub 2024 Sep 23.
4
Emergency department crowding: An examination of older adults and vulnerability.急诊科拥挤:对老年人及脆弱性的研究。
Nurs Ethics. 2025 Feb;32(1):99-110. doi: 10.1177/09697330241238333. Epub 2024 Mar 13.
5
An initiative to reduce psychiatric boarding in a Cape Town emergency department.开普敦一家急诊科减少精神科住院治疗的一项举措。
S Afr J Psychiatr. 2023 Nov 14;29:2075. doi: 10.4102/sajpsychiatry.v29i0.2075. eCollection 2023.
6
[Not Available].[无可用内容]。
CMAJ. 2023 Oct 3;195(38):E1331-E1332. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.231156-f.
7
Without more acute care beds, hospitals are on their own to grapple with emergency department crises.由于缺乏更多的急症护理床位,医院只能自行应对急诊科危机。
CMAJ. 2023 Sep 5;195(34):E1157-E1158. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.231156.
8
Frequency and Trends of Pre-Pandemic Surge Periods in U.S. Emergency Departments, 2006-2019.2006 - 2019年美国急诊科疫情前激增期的频率与趋势
Crit Care Explor. 2023 Aug 21;5(8):e0954. doi: 10.1097/CCE.0000000000000954. eCollection 2023 Aug.
9
Operations Factors Associated with Emergency Department Length of Stay: Analysis of a National Operations Database.与急诊科住院时间相关的操作因素:国家操作数据库分析。
West J Emerg Med. 2023 Jan 31;24(2):178-184. doi: 10.5811/westjem.2022.10.56609.
10
Association of ICU Admission and Outcomes in Sepsis and Acute Respiratory Failure.脓毒症和急性呼吸衰竭患者 ICU 入住与结局的相关性。
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2022 Mar 1;205(5):520-528. doi: 10.1164/rccm.202106-1350OC.