• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

双猪尾支架在体外冲击波碎石术中的应用。

Use of double-pigtail stents in extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy.

作者信息

Pryor J L, Jenkins A D

机构信息

Department of Urology, University of Virginia School of Medicine, Charlottesville.

出版信息

J Urol. 1990 Mar;143(3):475-8. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5347(17)39993-7.

DOI:10.1016/s0022-5347(17)39993-7
PMID:2406462
Abstract

Double-pigtail stents are placed commonly in patients before extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy to prevent ureteral obstruction from steinstrasse. The use of double-pigtail stents in lithotripsy patients with a moderate stone burden was studied in a prospective randomized trial. Patients with unilateral renal stone(s) with at least 1 diameter between 7 and 25 mm. were eligible for the study. Fifty patients were randomized to a control or stented group. Double-pigtail stents with an attached suture were placed immediately before extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy in the stented group. Stents were removed by the patients 1 week after lithotripsy. A survey on pain and associated symptoms was completed by patients at 1 and 14 days after treatment. There was no statistical difference in flank or abdominal pain, nausea, vomiting, temperature or use of analgesics at 1 and 14 days after extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy in the control and stented groups. All patients in the stented groups complained of side effects attributable to the stent including urinary frequency and urgency, bladder pain, hematuria and flank pain with urination. Of 25 patients with stents 7 (27%) had early removal because of severe irritation, early migration or accidental removal. Among the patients with follow-up x-rays 1 month after treatment 17 of 21 (81%) in the control group and 12 of 19 (63%) in the stented group showed no evidence of remaining stones. The use of double-pigtail stents is not beneficial in patients with a moderate stone burden. Double-pigtail stents are associated with considerable patient discomfort but no decrease in symptomatic ureteral obstruction or final stone eradication rate.

摘要

在进行体外冲击波碎石术之前,通常会为患者放置双猪尾支架,以防止铸型结石导致输尿管梗阻。在一项前瞻性随机试验中,对结石负荷中等的碎石术患者使用双猪尾支架的情况进行了研究。入选标准为患有单侧肾结石、至少有1个直径在7至25毫米之间的患者。50名患者被随机分为对照组或支架置入组。在支架置入组中,在体外冲击波碎石术前立即放置带有缝线的双猪尾支架。碎石术后1周,患者自行取出支架。治疗后1天和14天,患者完成了关于疼痛及相关症状的调查。对照组和支架置入组在体外冲击波碎石术后1天和14天,在胁腹或腹痛、恶心、呕吐、体温或使用镇痛药方面无统计学差异。支架置入组的所有患者均抱怨有与支架相关的副作用,包括尿频、尿急、膀胱疼痛、血尿和排尿时胁腹疼痛。在25名置入支架的患者中,有7名(27%)因严重刺激、早期移位或意外取出而提前取出支架。在治疗后1个月进行随访X光检查的患者中,对照组21名患者中有17名(81%),支架置入组19名患者中有12名(63%)未显示有残留结石的迹象。对于结石负荷中等的患者,使用双猪尾支架并无益处。双猪尾支架会给患者带来相当大的不适,但在有症状的输尿管梗阻或最终结石清除率方面并无降低。

相似文献

1
Use of double-pigtail stents in extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy.双猪尾支架在体外冲击波碎石术中的应用。
J Urol. 1990 Mar;143(3):475-8. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5347(17)39993-7.
2
Use of ureteral stent in extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for upper urinary calculi: a systematic review and meta-analysis.体外冲击波碎石术治疗上尿路结石中输尿管支架的应用:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Urol. 2011 Oct;186(4):1328-35. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2011.05.073.
3
Use of double-J stents prior to extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy is not beneficial: results of a prospective randomized study.体外冲击波碎石术前使用双J支架并无益处:一项前瞻性随机研究的结果
Int Urol Nephrol. 2008;40(1):19-22. doi: 10.1007/s11255-006-9030-8. Epub 2007 Mar 30.
4
Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for large renal calculi: the role of ureteral stents. A randomized trial.体外冲击波碎石术治疗大型肾结石:输尿管支架的作用。一项随机试验。
J Urol. 1991 Apr;145(4):699-702. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5347(17)38428-8.
5
[Pigtail suture stent: decisive progress towards double-pigtail stent tolerance and unexpected properties of the suture in the ureter].猪尾缝线支架:在双猪尾支架耐受性方面取得的决定性进展以及缝线在输尿管中的意外特性
Prog Urol. 2014 Jun;24(7):441-50. doi: 10.1016/j.purol.2013.12.007. Epub 2014 Feb 10.
6
The role of silicone ureteral stents in extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy of large renal calculi.
J Urol. 1988 Jan;139(1):15-7. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5347(17)42274-9.
7
Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy in impacted upper ureteral stones: a prospective randomized comparison between stented and non-stented techniques.体外冲击波碎石术治疗嵌顿性上段输尿管结石:支架与非支架技术的前瞻性随机比较。
Urology. 2010 Jan;75(1):45-50. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2009.06.071. Epub 2009 Oct 7.
8
Clinical Effectiveness of Single Pigtail Suture Stent on Patient Comfort: A Double-Blind Prospective Randomized Trial.单猪尾缝线支架对患者舒适度的临床效果:一项双盲前瞻性随机试验。
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2020 Nov;30(11):1183-1188. doi: 10.1089/lap.2020.0127. Epub 2020 Apr 15.
9
Place of double-J stents in extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy.双J管在体外冲击波碎石术中的应用
Eur Urol. 1993;23(4):460-2. doi: 10.1159/000474653.
10
A randomized outcomes trial of ureteral stents for extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy of solitary kidney or proximal ureteral stones.输尿管支架用于孤立肾或近端输尿管结石体外冲击波碎石术的随机结果试验。
J Urol. 2002 May;167(5):1981-3.

引用本文的文献

1
Effects of Continuous Catheterization on Reducing Postoperative Urinary Tract Infection in Cervical Cancer Patients with Double J Stent Placement.双 J 管置入术对宫颈癌术后患者留置导尿减少尿路感染的效果观察
J Healthc Eng. 2021 Nov 9;2021:9299001. doi: 10.1155/2021/9299001. eCollection 2021.
2
Indications and contraindications for shock wave lithotripsy and how to improve outcomes.冲击波碎石术的适应症、禁忌症及如何改善治疗效果。
Asian J Urol. 2018 Oct;5(4):256-263. doi: 10.1016/j.ajur.2018.08.006. Epub 2018 Sep 4.
3
Efficacy of commercialised extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy service: a review of 589 renal stones.
商业化体外冲击波碎石术服务的疗效:对589例肾结石的回顾
BMC Urol. 2017 Jul 27;17(1):59. doi: 10.1186/s12894-017-0249-8.
4
Can a brief period of double J stenting improve the outcome of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for renal calculi sized 1 to 2 cm?双 J 管置管短时间留置能否改善 1 至 2cm 肾结石体外冲击波碎石术的治疗效果?
Investig Clin Urol. 2017 Mar;58(2):103-108. doi: 10.4111/icu.2017.58.2.103. Epub 2017 Feb 15.
5
Comparative Study between Standard and Totally Tubeless Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy.标准经皮肾镜取石术与完全无管化经皮肾镜取石术的对比研究
Korean J Urol. 2012 Nov;53(11):785-9. doi: 10.4111/kju.2012.53.11.785. Epub 2012 Nov 14.
6
Use of double-J stents prior to extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy is not beneficial: results of a prospective randomized study.体外冲击波碎石术前使用双J支架并无益处:一项前瞻性随机研究的结果
Int Urol Nephrol. 2008;40(1):19-22. doi: 10.1007/s11255-006-9030-8. Epub 2007 Mar 30.
7
Direct ureteric length measurement from intravenous pyelography: does height represent ureteric length?
Urol Res. 2005 Jun;33(3):199-202. doi: 10.1007/s00240-004-0461-3. Epub 2005 Feb 25.
8
Spontaneous fracture of indwelling ureteral stents in patients treated with extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy: two case reports.体外冲击波碎石术治疗患者中留置输尿管支架的自发性断裂:两例报告
Int Urol Nephrol. 1996;28(1):15-9. doi: 10.1007/BF02550132.
9
Prevention of renal scarring from pyelonephritis in nonhuman primates by vaccination with a synthetic Escherichia coli serotype O8 oligosaccharide-protein conjugate.通过接种合成的大肠杆菌O8血清型寡糖-蛋白质偶联物预防非人灵长类动物肾盂肾炎所致肾瘢痕形成。
Infect Immun. 1993 Dec;61(12):5214-8. doi: 10.1128/iai.61.12.5214-5218.1993.